The Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) has enormous industrial applicability. This problem refers to a set of jobs that should be processed in a specific order using a set of machines. For the single-objective optimization JSSP problem, Simulated Annealing is among the best algorithms. However, in Multi-Objective JSSP (MOJSSP), these algorithms have barely been analyzed, and the Threshold Accepting Algorithm has not been published for this problem. It is worth mentioning that the researchers in this area have not reported studies with more than three objectives, and the number of metrics they used to measure their performance is less than two or three. In this paper, we present two MOJSSP metaheuristics based on Simulated Annealing: Chaotic Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing (CMOSA) and Chaotic Multi-Objective Threshold Accepting (CMOTA). We developed these algorithms to minimize three objective functions and compared them using the HV metric with the recently published algorithms, MOMARLA, MOPSO, CMOEA, and SPEA. The best algorithm is CMOSA (HV of 0.76), followed by MOMARLA and CMOTA (with HV of 0.68), and MOPSO (with HV of 0.54). In addition, we show a complexity comparison of these algorithms, showing that CMOSA, CMOTA, and MOMARLA have a similar complexity class, followed by MOPSO.

The Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) consists of finding the best scheduling for a set of jobs that should be processed in a specific order using a set of machines. This problem belongs to the NP-hard class problems and has enormous industrial applicability. In the manufacturing area, decision-makers consider several criteria to elaborate their production schedules. These cases are studied in multi-objective optimization. However, few works are addressed from this multi-objective perspective. The literature shows that multi-objective evolutionary algorithms can solve these problems efficiently; nevertheless, multi-objective algorithms have slow convergence to the Pareto optimal front. This paper proposes three multi-objective Scatter Search hybrid algorithms that improve the convergence speed evolving on a reduced set of solutions. These algorithms are: Scatter Search/Local Search (SS/LS), Scatter Search/Chaotic Multi-Objective Threshold Accepting (SS/CMOTA), and Scatter Search/Chaotic Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing (SS/CMOSA). The proposed algorithms are compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms IMOEA/D, CMOSA, and CMOTA, using the MID, Spacing, HV, Spread, and IGD metrics; according to the experimental results, the proposed algorithms achieved the best performance. Notably, they obtained a 47% reduction in the convergence time to reach the optimal Pareto front.

The classic model of Markowitz for designing investment portfolios is an optimization problem with two objectives: maximize returns and minimize risk. Various alternatives and improvements have been proposed by different authors, who have contributed to the theory of portfolio selection. One of the most important contributions is the Sharpe Ratio, which allows comparison of the expected return of portfolios. Another important concept for investors is diversification, measured through the average correlation. In this measure, a high correlation indicates a low level of diversification, while a low correlation represents a high degree of diversification. In this work, three algorithms developed to solve the portfolio problem are presented. These algorithms used the Sharpe Ratio as the main metric to solve the problem of the aforementioned two objectives into only one objective: maximization of the Sharpe Ratio. The first, GENPO, used a Genetic Algorithm (GA). In contrast, the second and third algorithms, SAIPO and TAIPO used Simulated Annealing and Threshold Accepting algorithms, respectively. We tested these algorithms using datasets taken from the Mexican Stock Exchange. The findings were compared with other mathematical models of related works, and obtained the best results with the proposed algorithms.

The Protein Folding Problem (PFP) is a big challenge that has remained unsolved for more than fifty years. This problem consists of obtaining the tertiary structure or Native Structure (NS) of a protein knowing its amino acid sequence. The computational methodologies applied to this problem are classified into two groups, known as Template-Based Modeling (TBM) and ab initio models. In the latter methodology, only information from the primary structure of the target protein is used. In the literature, Hybrid Simulated Annealing (HSA) algorithms are among the best ab initio algorithms for PFP; Golden Ratio Simulated Annealing (GRSA) is a PFP family of these algorithms designed for peptides. Moreover, for the algorithms designed with TBM, they use information from a target protein’s primary structure and information from similar or analog proteins. This paper presents GRSA-SSP methodology that implements a secondary structure prediction to build an initial model and refine it with HSA algorithms. Additionally, we compare the performance of the GRSAX-SSP algorithms versus its corresponding GRSAX. Finally, our best algorithm GRSAX-SSP is compared with PEP-FOLD3, I-TASSER, QUARK, and Rosetta, showing that it competes in small peptides except when predicting the largest peptides.