Luciano Strafella

Dr. Luciano Strafella

University of Salento
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACA.P. Carlucci
A.P. Carlucci
AFA. Ficarella
A. Ficarella
DLD. Laforgia
D. Laforgia
LSLuciano Strafella
Luciano Strafella

10 March 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Teresa CastiglioneTeresa Castiglione
Teresa Castiglione
Diego PerroneDiego Perrone
Diego Perrone
LSLuciano Strafella
Luciano Strafella
Antonio FicarellaAntonio Ficarella
Antonio Ficarella
SBSergio Bova
Sergio Bova
The engine fuel control system plays a crucial role in engine performance and fuel economy. Fuel control, in traditional engine control systems, is carried out by means of sensor-based control methods, which correct the fuel flow rate through correlations or scheduled parameters in order to reduce the error between a measured parameter and its desired value. In the presence of component degradation, however, the relationship between the engine measurable parameters and performance may lead to an increase in the control error. In this research, linear models for advanced control systems and for direct fuel control in the presence of components degradation are proposed, with the main objective being to directly predict and correct fuel consumption in the presence of degradation instead of adopting measurable parameters. Two techniques were adopted for model linearization: Small Perturbation and System Identification. Results showed that both models are characterized by high accuracy in predicting the output engine variables, with the mean errors between model prediction and data below 1%. The maximum errors, recorded for shaft power, were about 6% for Small Perturbation and lower than 3% for System Identification. A simple correlation between engine performance and components degradation was also demonstrated; in particular, the achieved results allow one to conclude that the Small Perturbation approach is the best candidate for controller development when a prediction of components degradation is included.

1 June 2018 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FJFarzad Jaliliantabar
Farzad Jaliliantabar
BGBarat Ghobadian
Barat Ghobadian
ACAntonio Paolo Carlucci
Antonio Paolo Carlucci
GNGholamhassan Najafi
Gholamhassan Najafi
Antonio FicarellaAntonio Ficarella
Antonio Ficarella
SDStefania De Domenico
Stefania De Domenico

29 July 2021 in Aerospace
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria Grazia De GiorgiMaria Grazia De Giorgi
Maria Grazia De Giorgi
LSLuciano Strafella
Luciano Strafella
Antonio FicarellaAntonio Ficarella
Antonio Ficarella
One of the most important parts of a turboshaft engine, which has a direct impact on the performance of the engine and, as a result, on the performance of the propulsion system, is the engine fuel control system. The traditional engine control system is a sensor-based control method, which uses measurable parameters to control engine performance. In this context, engine component degradation leads to a change in the relationship between the measurable parameters and the engine performance parameters, and thus an increase of control errors. In this work, a nonlinear model predictive control method for turboshaft direct fuel control is implemented to improve engine response ability also in presence of degraded conditions. The control objective of the proposed model is the prediction of the specific fuel consumption directly instead of the measurable parameters. In this way is possible decentralize controller functions and realize an intelligent engine with the development of a distributed control system. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are widely used as data-driven models for modelling of complex systems such as aeroengine performance. In this paper, two Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Networks have been trained to predict the specific fuel consumption for several transient flight maneuvers. The data used for the ANN predictions have been estimated through the Gas Turbine Simulation Program. In particular the first ANN predicts the state variables based on flight conditions and the second one predicts the performance parameter based on the previous predicted variables. The results show a good approximation of the studied variables also in degraded conditions.

24 February 2022 in Aerospace
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria Grazia De GiorgiMaria Grazia De Giorgi
Maria Grazia De Giorgi
LSLuciano Strafella
Luciano Strafella
Nicola MengaNicola Menga
Nicola Menga
Antonio FicarellaAntonio Ficarella
Antonio Ficarella
An efficient maintenance plan is an important aspect for aeronautical companies to increase flight safety and decrease costs. Modern technologies are widely used in the Engine Health Monitoring (EHM) discipline to develop intelligent tools capable of monitoring the health status of engines. In this work, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and in-detail Feed-Forward Neural Networks (FFNNs) were exploited in addition to a Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) to design an intelligent diagnostic tool capable of predicting the Performance Parameters (PPs) of the main components used as their health index. For this purpose, appropriate datasets containing information about degraded engines were generated using the Gas Turbine Simulation Program (GSP). Finally, the original datasets and the reduced datasets obtained after the application of KPCA to the original datasets were both used in the training and testing process of neural networks, and results were compared. The goal was to obtain a reliable intelligent tool useful for diagnostic purposes. The study showed that the degraded component detection and estimation of its performance achieved by using the hybrid KPCA–FFNNs were predicted with accurate and reliable performance, as demonstrated through detailed quantitative confusion matrix analysis.

1 June 2015 in Journal of Energy Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAntonio Paolo Carlucci
Antonio Paolo Carlucci
Gianpiero ColangeloGianpiero Colangelo
Gianpiero Colangelo
Antonio FicarellaAntonio Ficarella
Antonio Ficarella
Domenico LaforgiaDomenico Laforgia
Domenico Laforgia
LSLuciano Strafella
Luciano Strafella