Mark Mifsud

Dr. Mark Mifsud

University of Malta, Imsida, Malta
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2019 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Walter Leal FilhoWalter Leal Filho
Walter Leal Filho
CSChris Shiel
Chris Shiel
Arminda  PaçoArminda Paço
Arminda Paço
Mark MifsudMark Mifsud
Mark Mifsud
LÁLucas Veiga Ávila
Lucas Veiga Ávila
SCSandra Caeiro
Sandra Caeiro

28 June 2017 in International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Walter Leal FilhoWalter Leal Filho
Walter Leal Filho
Ulisses AzeiteiroUlisses Azeiteiro
Ulisses Azeiteiro
Fátima de Fátima Pereira AlvesFátima de Fátima Pereira Alves
Fátima de Fátima Pereira Alves
PPPaul Pace
Paul Pace
Mark MifsudMark Mifsud
Mark Mifsud
Antje DisterheftAntje Disterheft
Antje Disterheft

1 May 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Walter Leal FilhoWalter Leal Filho
Walter Leal Filho
FSFernanda Frankenberger Silva
Fernanda Frankenberger Silva
Amanda Lange SalviaAmanda Lange Salvia
Amanda Lange Salvia
Ulisses AzeiteiroUlisses Azeiteiro
Ulisses Azeiteiro
FAFatima Alves
Fatima Alves
LÁLucas Veiga Ávila
Lucas Veiga Ávila

24 June 2021 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Walter Leal FilhoWalter Leal Filho
Walter Leal Filho
TWTony Wall
Tony Wall
LRLez Rayman-Bacchus
Lez Rayman-Bacchus
Mark MifsudMark Mifsud
Mark Mifsud
DPDiana J. Pritchard
Diana J. Pritchard
ABAbdul-Lateef Balogun
Abdul-Lateef Balogun
Background: “The impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shutdown it triggered at universities across the world, led to a great degree of social isolation among university staff and students. The aim of this study was to identify the perceived consequences of this on staff and their work and on students and their studies at universities.Method: The study used a variety of methods, which involved an on-line survey on the influences of social isolation using a non-probability sampling. More specifically, two techniques were used, namely a convenience sampling (i.e. involving members of the academic community, which are easy to reach by the study team), supported by a snow ball sampling (recruiting respondents among acquaintances of the participants). A total of 711 questionnaires from 41 countries were received. Descriptive statistics were deployed to analyse trends and to identify socio-demographic differences. Inferential statistics were used to assess significant differences among the geographical regions, work areas and other socio-demographic factors related to impacts of social isolation of university staff and students.Results: The study reveals that 90% of the respondents have been affected by the shutdown and unable to perform normal work or studies at their institution for between 1 week to 2 months. While 70% of the respondents perceive negative impacts of COVID 19 on their work or studies, more than 60% of them value the additional time that they have had indoors with families and others. .Conclusions: While the majority of the respondents agree that they suffered from the lack of social interaction and communication during the social distancing/isolation, there were significant differences in the reactions to the lockdowns between academic staff and students. There are also differences in the degree of influence of some of the problems, when compared across geographical regions. In addition to policy actions that may be deployed, further research on innovative methods of teaching and communication with students is needed in order to allow staff and students to better cope with social isolation in cases of new or recurring pandemics.

1 July 2019 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPetra Molthan-Hill
Petra Molthan-Hill
NWNicholas Worsfold
Nicholas Worsfold
GNGustavo J. Nagy
Gustavo J. Nagy
Walter Leal FilhoWalter Leal Filho
Walter Leal Filho
Mark MifsudMark Mifsud
Mark Mifsud

25 September 2021 in Environmental Sciences Europe
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Walter Leal FilhoWalter Leal Filho
Walter Leal Filho
Mihaela SimaMihaela Sima
Mihaela Sima
Ayyoob SharifiAyyoob Sharifi
Ayyoob Sharifi
Johannes M. LuetzJohannes M. Luetz
Johannes M. Luetz
Amanda Lange SalviaAmanda Lange Salvia
Amanda Lange Salvia
ELErandathie Lokupitiya
Erandathie Lokupitiya
Background: Climate change is a problem which is global in nature, and whose effects go across a wide range of disciplines. It is therefore important that this theme is taken into account as part of universities´ teaching and research programs. Methods: A three-tiered approach was used, consisting of a bibliometric analysis, an online survey and a set of case studies, which allow a profile to be built, as to how a sample of universities from 45 countries handle climate change as part of their teaching programs. Results: This paper reports on a study which aimed at identifying the extent to which matters related to climate change are addressed within the teaching and research practices at universities, with a focus on the training needs of teaching staff. It consists of a bibliometric analysis, combined with an online worldwide survey aimed at ascertaining the degree of involvement from universities in reducing their own carbon footprint, and the ways they offer training provisions on the topic. This is complemented by a set of 12 case studies from universities round the world, illustrating current trends on how universities handle climate change. Apart from reporting on the outcomes of the study, the paper highlights what some universities are doing to handle climate issues, and discusses the implications of the research. Conclusions: The paper lists some items via which universities may better educate and train their students on how to handle the many challenges posed by climate change.