We report the performance of a field-scale permeable reactive barrier (PRB) for the biological treatment of nitrate-contaminated groundwater. The reactive material of the PRB consisted of a mixture of gravel and mulch as a carbon source for denitrifying bacteria. The PRB was equipped with a delivery system that allowed injecting NO3- at controlled rates from the surface directly into the up-gradient layer of the PRB. This way, NO3- concentration entering the PRB was varied (from 1 to 530 mg/L) with the purpose of evaluating the ultimate efficiency of the PRB under different NO3- loadings. The PRB was successful at removing NO3- from groundwater at inlet concentrations up to 280 mg/L (with NO3- removal percentages ≥97%). Monitoring of groundwater at different depths within the PRB provided evidence that NO3- underwent denitrification preferably at the deepest part of the PRB, where more favourable reducing conditions were achieved. Among the shortcomings of the PRB were the fluctuations of groundwater fluxes caused by intense rainfalls during the study period, although they generally did not pose concern for the denitrification capacity of the PRB. Emission fluxes of gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) from the PRB to the atmosphere were also measured. The results are finally compared with the few others reported existing PRBs for nitrate-contaminated groundwater worldwide.
This paper summarizes international state-of-the-art applications and opportunities for employing and deploying hydrological, geochemical, and isotopic tools in an integrated manner for investigations of mining operations. It is intended to aid formulation of more integrated approaches for evaluating the overall sustainability of mining projects. The focus is particularly on mine waters, including: environmental water sources, mine water dynamics, and as a source and vector for pollution in the wider environment. The guidance is generic to mining projects and not just reflective of a particular extraction (e.g. coal, metalliferous, uranium) industry. A mine life cycle perspective has been adopted to highlight the potential for more integrated investigations at each stage of a mining operation. Three types of mines have been considered: new (i.e. those in the planning stage), active (i.e. working mines), and historical mines (i.e. inactive and abandoned mines). The practical usage of geochemical analyses and isotopic studies described here emphasise characterisation, dynamics, and process understanding for water quality considerations in tandem with water resource and environmental impact implications. Both environmental (i.e. ambient) and applied (i.e. injected) tracers are considered. This guide is written for scientists (including isotope specialists) who have limited or no mine water experience, environmental managers, planners, consultants, and regulators with key interests in planned, active, and legacy mining projects.
12 January 2005 in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry