Xiangyang Ju

Dr. Xiangyang Ju

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 April 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAnas Almukhtar
Anas Almukhtar
Xiangyang JuXiangyang Ju
Xiangyang Ju
BKBalvinder Khambay
Balvinder Khambay
JMJames McDonald
James McDonald
Ashraf AyoubAshraf Ayoub
Ashraf Ayoub
Superimposition of two dimensional preoperative and postoperative facial images, including radiographs and photographs, are used to evaluate the surgical changes after orthognathic surgery. Recently, three dimensional (3D) imaging has been introduced allowing more accurate analysis of surgical changes. Surface based registration and voxel based registration are commonly used methods for 3D superimposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of the two methods. Pre-operative and 6 months post-operative cone beam CT scan (CBCT) images of 31 patients were randomly selected from the orthognathic patient database at the Dental Hospital and School, University of Glasgow, UK. Voxel based registration was performed on the DICOM images (Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine) using Maxilim software (Medicim-Medical Image Computing, Belgium). Surface based registration was performed on the soft and hard tissue 3D models using VRMesh (VirtualGrid, Bellevue City, WA). The accuracy of the superimposition was evaluated by measuring the mean value of the absolute distance between the two 3D image surfaces. The results were statistically analysed using a paired Student t-test, ANOVA with post-hoc Duncan test, a one sample t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient test. The results showed no significant statistical difference between the two superimposition methods (p<0.05). However surface based registration showed a high variability in the mean distances between the corresponding surfaces compared to voxel based registration, especially for soft tissue. Within each method there was a significant difference between superimposition of the soft and hard tissue models. There were no significant statistical differences between the two registration methods and it was unlikely to have any clinical significance. Voxel based registration was associated with less variability. Registering on the soft tissue in isolation from the hard tissue may not be a true reflection of the surgical change.

1 January 2017 in Optics and Lasers in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YXYuan Xue
Yuan Xue
TCTeng Cheng
Teng Cheng
XXXiaohai Xu
Xiaohai Xu
ZGZeren Gao
Zeren Gao
QLQianqian Li
Qianqian Li
QZQingchuan Zhang
Qingchuan Zhang

1 July 2013 in International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSM.I. Shafi
M.I. Shafi
Ashraf AyoubAshraf Ayoub
Ashraf Ayoub
Xiangyang JuXiangyang Ju
Xiangyang Ju
BKB. Khambay
B. Khambay

1 March 2013 in International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KNK.B. Naudi
K.B. Naudi
RBR. Benramadan
R. Benramadan
LBL. Brocklebank
L. Brocklebank
Xiangyang JuXiangyang Ju
Xiangyang Ju
BKB. Khambay
B. Khambay
Ashraf AyoubAshraf Ayoub
Ashraf Ayoub

1 January 2013 in International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TAT. Al-Anezi
T. Al-Anezi
BKB. Khambay
B. Khambay
MPMatthew PENG
Matthew PENG
EOE. O’leary
E. O’leary
Xiangyang JuXiangyang Ju
Xiangyang Ju
Ashraf AyoubAshraf Ayoub
Ashraf Ayoub

1 December 2015 in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAli Al-Hiyali
Ali Al-Hiyali
Ashraf AyoubAshraf Ayoub
Ashraf Ayoub
Xiangyang JuXiangyang Ju
Xiangyang Ju
MAMohammad Almuzian
Mohammad Almuzian
TAThamer Al-Anezi
Thamer Al-Anezi