The COVID-19 disease led to an unprecedented health emergency, still ongoing worldwide. Given the lack of a vaccine or a clear therapeutic strategy to counteract the infection as well as its secondary effects, there is currently a pressing need to generate new insights into the SARS-CoV-2 induced host response. Biomedical data can help to investigate new aspects of the COVID-19 pathogenesis, but source heterogeneity represents a major drawback and limitation. In this work, we applied data integration methods to develop a Unified Knowledge Space (UKS) and used it to identify a new set of genes associated with SARS-CoV-2 host response, both in vitro and in vivo. Functional analysis of these genes reveals possible long-term systemic effects of the infection, such as vascular remodelling and fibrosis. Finally, we identified a set of potentially relevant drugs targeting proteins involved in multiple steps of the host response to the virus.

Despite remarkable efforts of computational and predictive pharmacology to improve therapeutic strategies for complex diseases, only in a few cases have the predictions been eventually employed in the clinics. One of the reasons behind this drawback is that current predictive approaches are based only on the integration of molecular perturbation of a certain disease with drug sensitivity signatures, neglecting intrinsic properties of the drugs. Here we integrate mechanistic and chemocentric approaches to drug repositioning by developing an innovative network pharmacology strategy. We developed a multilayer network-based computational framework integrating perturbational signatures of the disease as well as intrinsic characteristics of the drugs, such as their mechanism of action and chemical structure. We present five case studies carried out on public data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, including invasive breast cancer, colon adenocarcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma. Our results highlight paclitaxel as a suitable drug for combination therapy for many of the considered cancer types. In addition, several non-cancer-related genes representing unusual drug targets were identified as potential candidates for pharmacological treatment of cancer.

The pharmacological arsenal against the COVID-19 pandemic is largely based on generic anti-inflammatory strategies or poorly scalable solutions. Moreover, as the ongoing vaccination campaign is rolling slower than wished, affordable and effective therapeutics are needed. To this end, there is increasing attention toward computational methods for drug repositioning and de novo drug design. Here, multiple data-driven computational approaches are systematically integrated to perform a virtual screening and prioritize candidate drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. From the list of prioritized drugs, a subset of representative candidates to test in human cells is selected. Two compounds, 7-hydroxystaurosporine and bafetinib, show synergistic antiviral effects in vitro and strongly inhibit viral-induced syncytia formation. Moreover, since existing drug repositioning methods provide limited usable information for de novo drug design, the relevant chemical substructures of the identified drugs are extracted to provide a chemical vocabulary that may help to design new effective drugs.

Despite the advent of mechanistic toxicology using omics data to link molecular perturbations with systemic outcomes, regulatory toxicology still lacks the application of mechanism‐anchored metrics from such data. This is partially because traditional gene‐centric analysis often falls short of linking molecular changes to adverse outcomes. To address this gap, BMDx2, an open‐source tool that transforms multi‐dose toxicogenomics datasets into quantitative, mechanistic evidence for human chemical safety assessment is developed. BMDx2 couples benchmark‐dose modeling with Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) enrichment to derive transcriptomic‐based points of departure, enabling potency ranking, chemical prioritization, and mechanistically anchored explanations of the effect of chemical exposures. BMDx2 can process a broad range of data, including DNA microarray and RNA sequencing studies. Here, case studies are used to illustrate the versatility of BMDx2 in characterizing the mechanism of action of chemicals. An initial case study on carbon nanotubes exposure applies integrative analysis of transcriptomics and genome‐wide DNA methylation data, uncovering cellular reprogramming processes underlying fibrosis. A second case study on bleomycin exposure demonstrate how transcriptomic data alone can be mapped to fibrosis‐related AOPs in a standardized, regulatory appropriate manner. Together, these examples show how BMDx2 supports the regulatory application of toxicogenomics and accelerates mechanism‐based chemical safety evaluation.

Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) provides the possibility to investigate transcriptomic profiles on a single cell level. However, the data show unique challenges in comparison to bulk transcriptomic data, one being high dropout rates, which yields high sparsity data. Many classical analysis and preprocessing pipelines are based on the assumption that poor data can be counteracted by quantity and that similar cells (samples) are close to each other in space. Clustering is commonly used to detect clusters (dense local cell neighborhoods) under the assumption that similar cells are close to each other in space (where close is dependent on the (distance) metric used). The most commonly used clustering methodologies to detect dense local neighborhoods are based on graph clustering on a nearest neighbor graph. However, high dropout rates may break this assumption and make it difficult to reliably detect such dense local neighborhoods.

The categorization of human diseases is mainly based on the affected organ system and phenotypic characteristics. This is limiting the view to the pathological manifestations, while it neglects mechanistic relationships that are crucial to develop therapeutic strategies. This work aims to advance the understanding of diseases and their relatedness beyond traditional phenotypic views. Hence, the similarity among 502 diseases is mapped using six different data dimensions encompassing molecular, clinical, and pharmacological information retrieved from public sources. Multiple distance measures and multi‐view clustering are used to assess the patterns of disease relatedness. The integration of all six dimensions into a consensus map of disease relationships reveals a divergent disease view from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), emphasizing novel insights offered by a multi‐view disease map. Disease features such as genes, pathways, and chemicals that are enriched in distinct disease groups are identified. Finally, an evaluation of the top similar diseases of three candidate diseases common in the Western population shows concordance with known epidemiological associations and reveals rare features shared between Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and Alzheimer's disease. A revision of disease relationships holds promise for facilitating the reconstruction of comorbidity patterns, repurposing drugs, and advancing drug discovery in the future.