Dimitrios Zografakis

Dimitrios Zografakis

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Dimitrios Zografakis

Informatics Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Economics & Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 April 2022 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDimitrios Sykas
Dimitrios Sykas
MSMaria Sdraka
Maria Sdraka
DZDimitrios Zografakis
Dimitrios Zografakis
Ioannis PapoutsisIoannis Papoutsis
Ioannis Papoutsis
In this work, we introduce Sen4AgriNet, a Sentinel-2-based time series multicountry benchmark dataset, tailored for agricultural monitoring applications with machine and deep learning. Sen4AgriNet dataset is annotated from farmer declarations collected via the land parcel identification system (LPIS) for harmonizing country-wide labels. These declarations have only recently been made available as open data, allowing for the first time the labeling of satellite imagery from ground truth data. We proceed to propose and standardize a new crop type taxonomy across Europe that addresses common agriculture policy (CAP) needs, based on the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) indicative crop classification scheme. Sen4AgriNet is the only multicountry, multiyear dataset that includes all spectral information. It is constructed to cover the period 2016–2020 for Catalonia and France, while it can be extended to include additional countries. Currently, it contains 42.5 million parcels, which makes it significantly larger than other available archives. We extract two subdatasets to highlight its value for diverse deep learning applications—the object aggregated dataset (OAD) and the patches assembled dataset (PAD). OAD capitalizes zonal statistics of each parcel, thus creating a powerful label-to-features instance for classification algorithms. On the other hand, PAD structure generalizes the classification problem to parcel extraction and semantic segmentation and labeling. The PAD and OAD are examined under three different scenarios to showcase and model the effects of spatial and temporal variability across different years and different countries. 1

23 October 2024 in Fire
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDimitris Sykas
Dimitris Sykas
DZDimitrios Zografakis
Dimitrios Zografakis
Konstantinos DemestichasKonstantinos Demestichas
Konstantinos Demestichas
This paper investigates the applicability of deep learning models for predicting the severity of forest wildfires, utilizing an innovative benchmark dataset called EO4WildFires. EO4WildFires integrates multispectral imagery from Sentinel-2, SAR data from Sentinel-1, and meteorological data from NASA Power annotated with EFFIS data for forest fire detection and size estimation. These data cover 45 countries with a total of 31,730 wildfire events from 2018 to 2022. All of these various sources of data are archived into data cubes, with the intention of assessing wildfire severity by considering both current and historical forest conditions, utilizing a broad range of data including temperature, precipitation, and soil moisture. The experimental setup has been arranged to test the effectiveness of different deep learning architectures in predicting the size and shape of wildfire-burned areas. This study incorporates both image segmentation networks and visual transformers, employing a consistent experimental design across various models to ensure the comparability of the results. Adjustments were made to the training data, such as the exclusion of empty labels and very small events, to refine the focus on more significant wildfire events and potentially improve prediction accuracy. The models’ performance was evaluated using metrics like F1 score, IoU score, and Average Percentage Difference (aPD). These metrics offer a multi-faceted view of model performance, assessing aspects such as precision, sensitivity, and the accuracy of the burned area estimation. Through extensive testing the final model utilizing LinkNet and ResNet-34 as backbones, we obtained the following metric results on the test set: 0.86 F1 score, 0.75 IoU, and 70% aPD. These results were obtained when all of the available samples were used. When the empty labels were absent during the training and testing, the model increased its performance significantly: 0.87 F1 score, 0.77 IoU, and 44.8% aPD. This indicates that the number of samples, as well as their respectively size (area), tend to have an impact on the model’s robustness. This restriction is well known in the remote sensing domain, as accessible, accurately labeled data may be limited. Visual transformers like TeleViT showed potential but underperformed compared to segmentation networks in terms of F1 and IoU scores.

21 November 2025 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSpyridon Kaloudis
Spyridon Kaloudis
DRDimitrios Raptis
Dimitrios Raptis
SGStavroula Galanopoulou
Stavroula Galanopoulou
Konstantinos DemestichasKonstantinos Demestichas
Konstantinos Demestichas
ELEvdoxia Lykoudi
Evdoxia Lykoudi
Constantina CostopoulouConstantina Costopoulou
Constantina Costopoulou