The linear economy model in the sugar agroindustry has generated multiple impacts due to the underutilization of by-products and reliance on fossil fuels. Through predictive modeling and anaerobic digestion, the circular bioeconomy of sugarcane biomass enables the generation of biogas and electricity in an environmentally sustainable manner. This theoretical-applied research proposes a predictive model to estimate the energy potential of by-products such as bagasse, vinasse, molasses, and filter cake, based on historical production data and validated technical coefficients. The model uses milled sugarcane as a baseline and projects its energy conversion under three scenarios through 2030. In its most favorable configuration, the model estimates energy production of up to 15.5 billion Nm³ of biogas in Cuba and 9.9 billion in Peru. The model’s architecture includes four residual biomass flows and bioenergy conversion factors applicable to electricity generation. It is validated using national statistical series from 2000 to 2018 and presents relative errors below 5%. Cuba, with a peak of over 13,000 GWh of electricity from bagasse, and Peru, with a stable output between 6500 and 7500 GWh, reflect the highest and lowest projected energy utilization, respectively. Bagasse accounts for over 60% of the total estimated energy contribution. This modeling tool is fundamental for advancing a transition toward a circular economy, as it helps mitigate environmental impacts, improve agroindustrial waste management, and guide sustainable policies in sugarcane-based contexts.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to examine how shared perceptions of collective behaviors, such as transformational leadership climate (TLC), collective trust and collective engagement, affect unit performance.Design/methodology/approach: The sample consisted of 450 employees in 74 agencies of a financial organization, using measurements at the collective team level. Multiple structural equation modeling analyses were used to test the hypotheses.Findings: The relationship between TLC and unit performance was sequentially mediated by collective trust and collective engagement.Originality/value: This study highlights how employees' shared perceptions of different team characteristics can affect the overall functioning and performance of an organization.

The feed industry is characterized by high energy consumption during the grinding stage, where hammer mills can account for up to 50% of total electricity usage; furthermore, efficiency analyses are based only on the classical equations reported in the literature. In this context, the present theoretical-applied research aimed to improve the efficiency of a plant operating below its nominal capacity. To achieve this, a comprehensive mathematical model was developed, integrating power and grain disintegration equations while overcoming the limitations of classical comminution theories. The model incorporates key factors such as feed rate, moisture content, absorbed power and hammer wear. Additionally, specific correction factors for temperature ($K_t$) and mechanical degradation ($K_d$) were introduced to accurately represent real operating conditions. The study was based on extensive measurements of electrical current, power factor, energy consumption, particle size distribution and thermal variations under different load conditions. The statistical analysis, which included ANOVA, ANCOVA and multiple regressions, demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 98% (R²) and a pseudo-R² of 89%. This high correlation allowed for an 18% reduction in energy consumption equivalent to 4 kWh/t and up to a 30% improvement in particle size uniformity, surpassing typical factory performance. The findings highlight that integrating operational, thermodynamic and wear-related factors enhances the robustness of the model, promoting more reliable energy-management practices in hammer mills. Consequently, the results confirm that the developed model serves as a scientifically robust, efficient and applicable tool for improving energy efficiency and reducing environmental impacts in the agri-food industry.

The high dependence on fossil fuels for energy supply in hospitals compromises their operational sustainability, increases costs, and contributes significantly to polluting emissions. This study evaluates the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of integrating photovoltaic and solar thermal systems in a hospital located in a tropical Caribbean environment, characterized by continuous operation and high energy demand. The methodology combines advanced simulation using PVsyst for the photovoltaic subsystem and the f-chart method for the solar thermal system, using real data on electricity and domestic hot water demand. The proposed system achieves an installed photovoltaic power of close to 390 kWp, with an annual production of around 0.7 GWh and an average performance ratio of 0.80, demonstrating high technical performance. The solar thermal subsystem covers approximately two-thirds of the annual domestic hot water demand, supported by thermal storage suitable for hospital operation. From an economic standpoint, the total estimated investment is recovered in less than 10 years, with a positive net present value, confirming the system’s profitability over its useful life. In environmental terms, hybrid integration avoids more than 400 t of CO₂ per year, contributing significantly to the decarbonization of the health sector and the strengthening of energy security. The results obtained demonstrate that photovoltaic–thermal integration in tropical hospitals is technically and economically viable and constitutes a replicable solution for regions with high solar radiation and energy vulnerability. This research provides a comprehensive and reproducible methodological framework that can support sustainable energy planning and the design of public policies aimed at low-emission healthcare infrastructure.

Multi-criteria methods are highly attractive tools to address the inherent complexity of evaluating problems in various scientific areas. The combination of methods such as Delphi/AHP is emerging as a robust alternative to evaluate the sustainability of renewable energy sources. In this theoretical-descriptive research, the use of the Delphi method is proposed to select criteria and sub-criteria to obtain a high level of reliability, while the AHP method is used to establish an order of preference among the alternatives analyzed. This process requires the support of a committee of experts, whose role is to identify the various biomass alternatives that can be used in the sugar industry, considering aspects related to sustainability. The selected experts have identified energy, exergy, and emergetic indicators, in which economic, environmental, and social aspects are integrated. The multi-criteria analysis shows that the V1 variant was the most satisfactory in terms of biomass sustainability, representing 45% and 53% of the overall priorities in the evaluated case studies. In addition, the sensitivity analysis under an equal-weighted scenario for both study cases evidenced that variant V1 acquired the highest score (38.17%) among all alternatives. Variant V4 achieved the second highest score (31.79%), while alternative V2 achieved only 29.04%, respectively. The integration of Delphi/AHP methods emerges as a novel tool to assess sustainability in different industries of the energy sector.