Objective: To define benchmark values for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) enabling unbiased comparisons. Background: Transplantation for PHC is used with reluctance in many centers and even contraindicated in several countries. Although benchmark values for LT are available, there is a lack of specific data on LT performed for PHC. Methods: PHC patients considered for LT after Mayo-like protocol were analyzed in 17 reference centers in 2 continents over the recent 5-year period (2014–2018). The minimum follow-up was 1 year. Benchmark patients were defined as operated at high-volume centers (≥50 overall LT/year) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with a tumor diameter <3 cm, negative lymph nodes, and with the absence of relevant comorbidities. Benchmark cutoff values were derived from the 75th to 25th percentiles of the median values of all benchmark centers. Results: One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients underwent LT after completion of the neoadjuvant treatment. Of those, 89.6% qualified as benchmark cases. Benchmark cutoffs were 90-day mortality ≤5.2%; comprehensive complication index at 1 year of ≤33.7; grade ≥3 complication rates ≤66.7%. These values were better than benchmark values for other indications of LT. Five-year disease-free survival was largely superior compared with a matched group of nodal negative patients undergoing curative liver resection (n=106) (62% vs 32%, P<0.001). Conclusion: This multicenter benchmark study demonstrates that LT offers excellent outcomes with superior oncological results in early stage PHC patients, even in candidates for surgery. This provocative observation should lead to a change in available therapeutic algorithms for PHC.

Multimodal treatment, including systemic treatment and surgery, improved the prognosis of peritoneal metastasis (PM). Despite all efforts, recurrence rates remain high, and little data are available about clinical behavior or molecular patterns of PM in comparison to hematogenous metastasis. Here, we aimed to analyze recurrence patterns after multimodal treatment for PM from colorectal cancer. Patients with colorectal PM undergoing multimodal treatment including systemic chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) between 2005 and 2017 at 4 centers were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 505 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Of the patients, 82.1% received preoperative chemotherapy. Median peritoneal cancer index was 6 (interquartile range = 3-11). Median disease-free and overall survival was 12 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11 to 14) months and 51 (95% CI = 43 to 62) months, respectively. Disease recurred in 361 (71.5%) patients, presenting as isolated peritoneal recurrence in 24.6%, isolated hematogenous recurrence in 28.3%, and mixed recurrence in 13.9% of patients. Recurrence to the peritoneum was associated with an impaired time from recurrence to death of 21 (95% CI = 18 to 31) months for isolated peritoneal and 22 (95% CI = 16 to 30) months for mixed recurrence, compared with 43 (95% CI = 31 to >121) months for hematogenous recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.27 to 2.53; P = .001; and HR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.61 to 3.79; P < .001). On multiple logistic regression analysis, RAS mutational status (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.11 to 5.47; P = .03) and positive nodal stage of the primary (OR = 3.88, 95% CI = 1.40 to 11.86; P = .01) were identified as predictive factors for peritoneal recurrence. This study highlights the heterogeneity of peritoneal metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. Recurrent peritoneal metastasis after radical treatment represents a more aggressive subset of metastatic colorectal cancer.

To report on a concept of liver assessment during ex situ hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) and its significant impact on liver utilization. An analysis of prospectively collected data on donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers, treated by HOPE at our institution, during a 11-year period between January 2012 and December 2022. Four hundred and fifteen DCD Maastricht III livers were offered during the study period in Switzerland, resulting in 249 liver transplants. Of those, we performed 158 DCD III liver transplants at our institution, with 1-year patient survival and death censored graft survival (death with functioning graft) of 87 and 89%, respectively, thus comparable to benchmark graft survivals of ideal DBD and DCD liver transplants (89% and 86%). Correspondingly, graft loss for primary non-function or cholangiopathy was overall low, i.e., 7/158 (4.4%) and 11/158 (6.9%), despite more than 82% of DCD liver grafts ranked high (6-10 points) or futile risk (>10 points) according to the UK-DCD score. Consistently, death censored graft survival was not different between low-, high-risk or futile DCD III livers. The key behind these achievements was the careful development and implementation of a routine perfusate assessment of mitochondrial biomarkers for injury and function, i.e., release of flavin mononucleotide from complex I, perfusate NADH, and mitochondrial CO₂ production during HOPE, allowing a more objective interpretation of liver quality on a subcellular level, compared to donor derived data. HOPE after cold storage is a highly suitable and easy to perform perfusion approach, which allows reliable liver graft assessment, enabling surgeons to make a fact based decision on whether or not to implant the organ. HOPE-treatment should be combined with viability assessment particularly when used for high-risk organs, including DCD livers or organs with relevant steatosis. This study was supported by the Swiss National Foundation (SNF) grant 320030_189055/1 to PD.

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) originating from gastrointestinal cancer was considered a terminal disease until recently. The advent of better systemic treatment, a better understanding of prognostic factors, and finally, the advent of novel loco-regional therapies, has opened the door for the multimodal treatment of PM. These strategies, including radical surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) showed surprisingly good results, leading to the prolonged survival of patients with peritoneal metastasis. This has triggered a significant body of research, leading to the molecular characterization of PM, which may further help in the development of novel treatments. This review summarizes current evidence on peritoneal metastasis and explores potential novel mechanisms and therapeutic approaches to treat patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) with hypercalcemia, often deemed irreversible and detrimental to graft survival post-kidney transplantation (KT), prompts pre-transplant parathyroidectomy in hypercalcemic patients. In this retrospective analysis of 1212 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 2006 and 2019, the incidence and effect of persistent HPT and hypercalcemia on graft and patient survival, and risk factors for persistence were analyzed until 60 months of follow up (FU). At KT, 5.7% (n = 69) had no HPT, 32.7% (n = 396) had HPT without hypercalcemia and 37.0% (n = 448) had HPT with hypercalcemia. At 2 years FU, 26.4% (n = 320) of patients had no HPT and 6% (n = 73) had HPT with hypercalcemia. Dialysis and dialysis duration were linked to HPT development, while dialysis, KT waiting time and donor type correlated with persisting hypercalcemia after KT. KTRs with normalized PTH and recovered hypercalcemia had improved death-censored graft survival (p < 0.001) and overall patient survival (p < 0.001). HPT with hypercalcemia is frequent at time of KT with normalization of PTH and calcium in a substantial proportion of patients after a KT. These findings question the routine pre-KT parathyroidectomy for suspected parathyroid autonomy. Persisting HPT, especially with hypercalcemia, adversely affects graft and patient survival, suggesting the need for more aggressive treatment of HPT, especially in cases of persisting hypercalcemia.

STUDY AIMS: Abdominal and retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous. Despite a considerable number of sarcoma centres in Switzerland, only very limited data is available regarding clinical outcomes after primary surgical treatment. In this study, we retrospectively analysed a cohort of 157 patients treated at a Swiss sarcoma centre, aiming to assess whether the clinical outcomes in our cohort are comparable to those reported by international centres. METHODS: Overall, 271 patients with abdominal and retroperitoneal sarcomas, treated between January 2012 and December 2022, were available. Patients with malignant disease and primary resection were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival, while secondary endpoints included disease-free survival, incidence of histological subtypes, completeness of surgical resection and tumour rupture. RESULTS: Ultimately 157 patients with primary, resectable soft tissue sarcoma were included in the analysis. Median follow-up after surgery was 52.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.24–62.95). Median overall survival was 87.9 months (95% CI: 54.95–120.74); by subgroup, 117.5 months for gastrointestinal stroma tumour (95% CI: 76.96–158.00), 61.8 months for liposarcoma (95% CI: 40.16–83.36), 117.8 months for leiomyosarcoma (95% CI not achieved) and 100.2 months for other rare subtypes (95% CI: 59.65–111.30). Forty-four (28%) patients developed tumour recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Overall outcomes in this series are comparable to those from large international registries. A national data registry might help to improve reporting of clinical data and assure quality of care of Swiss sarcoma patients.