Camilla Andersen

Ms. Camilla Andersen

Aalborg University Copenhagen

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 August 2021 in Frontiers in Built Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CACamilla Andersen
Camilla Andersen
FRF. N. Rasmussen
F. N. Rasmussen
GHGuillaume Habert
Guillaume Habert
HBH. Birgisdóttir
H. Birgisdóttir
Buildings play a vital role in reaching the targets stated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees. Increasing the use of wood in construction is a proposed upcoming strategy to reduce the embodied greenhouse gas emissions of buildings. This study examines existing life cycle assessments of wooden buildings. The aim is to investigate embodied greenhouse gas emission results reported, as well as methodological approaches applied in existing literature. The study applies the protocol for Systematic Literature Reviews and finds 79 relevant papers. From the final sample, the study analyses 226 different scenarios in-depth in terms of embodied emissions, life cycle assessment method, life cycle inventory modelling and biogenic carbon approach. The analysis shows that the average reported values of embodied greenhouse gas emissions of wooden buildings are one-third to half of the embodied emissions reported from buildings in general. Additionally, from the analysis of the final sample we find that the majority of wooden building life cycle assessments apply similar methods and often leave out biogenic carbon from the assessment or simply do not declare it. This implies that the focus on variability in the different methods applied in wooden building life cycle assessments needs to be increased to establish the relationship between methodological choices and embodied emissions of wooden buildings. Further, transparency and conformity in biogenic carbon accounting in life cycle assessments is essential to enhance comparability between life cycle assessment studies and to avoid distortions in embodied GHG emission results.

18 August 2021 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFreja Nygaard Rasmussen
Freja Nygaard Rasmussen
CACamilla Andersen
Camilla Andersen
AWAlexandra Wittchen
Alexandra Wittchen
RHRasmus Hansen
Rasmus Hansen
HBHarpa Birgisdottir
Harpa Birgisdottir
The use of wood and timber products in the construction of buildings is repeatedly pointed towards as a mean for lowering the environmental footprint. With several countries preparing regulation for life cycle assessment of buildings, practitioners from industry will presumably look to the pool of data on wood products found in environmental product declarations (EPDs). However, the EPDs may vary broadly in terms of reporting and results. This study provides a comprehensive review of 81 third-party verified EN 15804 EPDs of cross laminated timber (CLT), glulam, laminated veneer lumber (LVL) and timber. The 81 EPDs represent 86 different products and 152 different product scenarios. The EPDs mainly represent European production, but also North America and Australia/New Zealand productions are represented. Reported global warming potential (GWP) from the EPDs vary within each of the investigated product categories, due to density of the products and the end-of-life scenarios applied. Median results per kg of product, excluding the biogenic CO2, are found at 0.26, 0.24, and 0.17 kg CO2e for CLT, glulam, and timber, respectively. Results further showed that the correlation between GWP and other impact categories is limited. Analysis of the inherent data uncertainty showed to add up to ±41% to reported impacts when assessed with an uncertainty method from the literature. However, in some of the average EPDs, even larger uncertainties of up to 90% for GWP are reported. Life cycle assessment practitioners can use the median values from this study as generic data in their assessments of buildings. To make the EPDs easier to use for practitioners, a more detailed coordination between EPD programs and their product category rules is recommended, as well as digitalization of EPD data.

16 February 2024 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CACamilla Andersen
Camilla Andersen
EHEndrit Hoxha
Endrit Hoxha
FRFreja Nygaard Rasmussen
Freja Nygaard Rasmussen
CSChristian Grau Sorensen
Christian Grau Sorensen
HBHarpa Birgisdottir
Harpa Birgisdottir

15 January 2024 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CACamilla Andersen
Camilla Andersen
EHEndrit Hoxha
Endrit Hoxha
FRFreja Nygaard Rasmussen
Freja Nygaard Rasmussen
CSChristian Grau Sørensen
Christian Grau Sørensen
HBHarpa Birgisdóttir
Harpa Birgisdóttir

5 March 2020 in Buildings and Cities
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CACamilla Andersen
Camilla Andersen
Kai KanafaniKai Kanafani
Kai Kanafani
Regitze ZimmermannRegitze Zimmermann
Regitze Zimmermann
FRFreja Nygaard Rasmussen
Freja Nygaard Rasmussen
HBHarpa Birgisdottir
Harpa Birgisdottir

5 June 2023 in Journal of Building Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRasmus Hansen
Rasmus Hansen
EHEndrit Hoxha
Endrit Hoxha
FRFreja Nygaard Rasmussen
Freja Nygaard Rasmussen
MRMorten Walbech Ryberg
Morten Walbech Ryberg
CACamilla Andersen
Camilla Andersen
HBHarpa Birgisdottir
Harpa Birgisdottir