The non-destructive thermal characterization of building envelopes relies significantly on various factors such as climate conditions, monitoring devices used, indoor environment, and conditioning systems. In the case of both the temperature-based method (TBM) and heat flux meter (HFM) approaches, U-value is determined considering the ideal condition of steady state. However, it is challenging to accurately define the true thermal condition of buildings when monitoring is affected by inherent uncertainties of the chosen approach and inadequate instrumentation of building envelopes. This paper presents the outcomes of an experimental campaign, that aimed to evaluate the impact of incorrectly positioned exterior sensors, on the precision of U-value measurements. This study simultaneously employed the TBM and HFM approaches. To enhance the accuracy of the results, rigorous outlier detection and statistical analysis were employed on the data collected from three autonomous monitoring systems. The findings of this study revealed that the applied data analysis yielded more satisfactory results for the TBM approach compared to HFM. However, regardless of the approach used, the effectiveness of outlier detection relied heavily on the accuracy of the monitoring systems. When removing an individual outlier, the monitoring systems characterized with higher accuracies provided U-values that were closer to the theoretical values, than less accurate ones.

This article analyses the situation that prevailed in 12 dwellings located on the outskirts of Madrid during Spain’s state of emergency. How did 24/7 occupation affect the quality of indoor air and power consumption patterns? The mixed method used (surveys and instrumental monitoring) pragmatically detected the variation in consumption, comfort and indoor air quality patterns before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The characteristics initially in place and household predisposition had a conclusive effect on such variations. The starting conditions, including household composition, habits and the way daily activities were performed, differed widely, logically affecting power consumption: 8/12 case studies increase occupancy density by more than 25 percent; 11/12 improve thermal comfort; 10/12 improve air quality but not necessarily translate in a sufficient ventilation practices; air quality was lower in the bedrooms on the whole; only 4/12 case studies use the potential of passive measures; only one household adopted energy savings strategies; 10/12 case studies increase electric power consumption but none of the dwellings was fitted with a renewable power generation system. The conclusion drawn is that, despite starting conditions differing widely, household composition, habits (including performance of daily activities performance) and power consumption also played an active role in the end result. This approach allowed to integrate qualitative and quantitative findings on indoor environmental quality (IEQ), energy use and households’ behavior. The objective data on the energy situation of the case studies not only is useful for the study, but also for potential enrollment in energy rehabilitation programs, such as the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).