Siddhartha Bhattacharya

Prof. Dr. Siddhartha Bhattacharya

Rajnagar Mahavidyalaya, Kolkata, India
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2020 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKoyel Chakraborty
Koyel Chakraborty
SBSurbhi Bhatia
Surbhi Bhatia
Siddhartha BhattacharyaSiddhartha Bhattacharya
Siddhartha Bhattacharya
Jan PlatosJan Platos
Jan Platos
RBRajib Bag
Rajib Bag
Abou ELLa HassanienAbou ELLa Hassanien
Abou ELLa Hassanien

7 January 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKoyel Chakraborty
Koyel Chakraborty
Siddhartha BhattacharyaSiddhartha Bhattacharya
Siddhartha Bhattacharya
RBRajib Bag
Rajib Bag

15 September 2022 in Artificial Intelligence Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAbhishek Gunjan
Abhishek Gunjan
Siddhartha BhattacharyaSiddhartha Bhattacharya
Siddhartha Bhattacharya

1 July 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAkhilesh Sharma
Akhilesh Sharma
GAGaurav Aggarwal
Gaurav Aggarwal
SBSachit Bhardwaj
Sachit Bhardwaj
PCPrasun Chakrabarti
Prasun Chakrabarti
TCTulika Chakrabarti
Tulika Chakrabarti
HMHairulnizam Mahdin
Hairulnizam Mahdin
Music is a heavenly way of expressing feelings about the world. The language of music has vast diversity. For centuries, people have indulged in debates to stratisfy between Western and Indian Classical Music. But through this paper, an understanding can be fabricated while differentiating the types of Indian Classical Music. Classical music is one of the essential characteristics of Indian Cultural Heritage. Indian Classical Music is divided into two major parts, i.e. Hindustani and Carnatic. Models have been sculptured and trained to classify between Hindustani and Carnatic Music. In this paper, two approaches are used to implement classification models. MFCCs are used as features and implemented models like DNN (1 Layer, 2 Layers, 3 Layers), CNN (1 Layer, 2 Layers, 3 Layers), RNN-LSTM, SVM (Sigmoid, Polynomial & Gaussian Kernel) as one approach. A 3 channels input is created by merging features like MFCC, Spectrogram and Scalogram and implemented models like VGG-16, CNN (1 Layer, 2 Layers, 3 Layers), ResNet-50 as another approach. 3 Layered CNN and RNN-LSTM model performed best among all the approaches.

1 April 2018 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAsit K. Das
Asit K. Das
SSShampa Sengupta
Shampa Sengupta
Siddhartha BhattacharyaSiddhartha Bhattacharya
Siddhartha Bhattacharya

2 June 2020 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TDTulika Dutta
Tulika Dutta
Siddhartha BhattacharyaSiddhartha Bhattacharya
Siddhartha Bhattacharya
SDSandip Dey
Sandip Dey
Jan PlatosJan Platos
Jan Platos
In recent times, several metaheuristic algorithms have been proposed for solving real world optimization problems. In this paper, a new metaheuristic algorithm, called the Border Collie Optimization is introduced. The algorithm is developed by mimicking the sheep herding styles of Border Collie dogs. The Border Collie’s unique herding style from the front as well as from the sides is adopted successfully in this paper. In this algorithm, the entire population is divided into two parts viz., dogs and sheep. This is done to equally focus on both exploration and exploitation of the search space. The Border Collie utilizes a predatory move called eyeing. This technique of the dogs is utilized to prevent the algorithm from getting stuck into local optima. A sensitivity analysis of the proposed algorithm has been carried out using the Sobol’s sensitivity indices with the Sobol g-function for tuning of parameters. The proposed algorithm is applied on thirty-five benchmark functions. The proposed algorithm provides very competitive results, when compared with seven state-of-the-art algorithms like Ant Colony optimization, Differential algorithm, Genetic algorithm, Grey-wolf optimizer, Harris Hawk optimization, Particle Swarm optimization and Whale optimization algorithm. The performance of the proposed algorithm is analytically and visually tested by different methods to judge its supremacy. Finally, the statistical significance of the proposed algorithm is established by comparing it with other algorithms by employing Kruskal-Wallis test and Friedman test.