The presence of arsenic in groundwater and other drinking water sources presents a notable public health concern. Although the utilization of iron oxide nanomaterials as arsenic adsorbents has shown promising results in batch experiments, few have succeeded in using nanomaterials in filter setups. In this study, the performance of nanomaterials, supported on sand, was first compared for arsenic adsorption by conducting continuous flow experiments. Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) were prepared with different synthetic methodologies to control the degree of agglomeration. IONPs were prepared by thermal decomposition or coprecipitation and compared with commercially available IONPs. Electron microscopy was used to characterize the degree of agglomeration of the pristine materials after deposition onto the sand. The column experiments showed that IONPs that presented less agglomeration and were well dispersed over the sand had a tendency to be released during water treatment. To overcome this implementation challenge, we proposed the use of clusters of iron oxide nanoparticles (cIONPs), synthesized by a solvothermal methodology, which was explored. An isotherm experiment was also conducted to determine the arsenic adsorption capacities of the iron oxide nanomaterials. cIONPs showed higher adsorption capacities (121.4 mg/g) than the other IONPs (11.1, 6.6, and 0.6 mg/g for thermal decomposition, coprecipitation, and commercially available IONPs, respectively), without the implementation issues presented by IONPs. Our results show that the use of clusters of nanoparticles of other compositions opens up the possibilities for multiple water remediation applications.

Exposure to high doses of manganese (Mn) via inhalation, dermal contact or direct consumption can cause adverse health effects. Welding fumes are a major source of manganese containing nanoparticles in occupational settings. Understanding the physicochemical properties of manganese-containing nanoparticles can be a first step in understanding their toxic potential following exposure. In particular, here we compare the size, morphology and Mn oxidation states of Mn oxide nanoparticles generated in the laboratory by arc discharge to those from welding collected in heavy vehicle manufacturing. Fresh nanoparticles collected at the exit of the spark discharge generation chamber consisted of individual or small aggregates of primary particles. These nanoparticles were allowed to age in a chamber to form chain-like aggregates of primary particles with morphologies very similar to those from welding fumes. The primary particles were a mixture of hausmannite (Mn₃O₄), bixbyite (Mn₂O₃) and manganosite (MnO) phases, whereas aged samples revealed a more amorphous structure. Both Mn²⁺ and Mn³⁺, as in a double valence stoichiometry present in Mn₃O₄, and Mn³⁺, as in Mn₂O₃ and MnOOH, were detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy on the surface of the nanoparticles in the laboratory nanoparticles and welding fumes. Dissolution studies conducted for these two Mn samples (aged and fresh fume) reveal different release kinetics of Mn ions in artificial lysosomal fluid (pH 4.5) and very limited dissolution in Gamble's solution (pH 7.4). Taken together, these data suggest several important considerations for understanding the health effects of welding fumes. First, the method of particle generation affects the crystallinity and phase of the oxide. Second, welding fumes consist of nanoparticles with multiple oxidation states, whether they are amorphous or crystalline, or occur as isolated nanoparticles or agglomerates. Third, although the dissolution behavior depends on the conditions used for nanoparticle generation, the dissolution of Mn oxide nanoparticles in the lysosomal fluid may promote Mn ion translocation into various organs causing toxic effects.