Background: Injuries related to sports are very common among athletes; they result in functional impairments and require a long recovery duration. Rehabilitation programs have a potential role in facilitating return to sports. Several rehabilitation modalities, including balance training, strength training, and hop-based exercises, have been studied extensively, but their effectiveness remains debated. The objective of this analysis was to assess the effectiveness of different rehabilitation programs for common lower limb injuries (LLIs). Methods: This work analyzed the data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from peer-reviewed journals. Eligible trials were those that reported rehabilitation interventions for LLIs and assessed functional performance, balance, and strength outcomes. The I² statistics were used to estimate the heterogeneity, whereas the random-effect tool was applied for the meta-analysis. Results: Balance training considerably improved Y-Balance Test (YBT) scores (p < 0.001), especially in posteromedial and posterolateral reach distances. Substantial improvements in performance were discovered based on Hop-based modality, where the subjects who underwent reconstruction experienced potential improvements in triple and single tests(p < 0.001). Neuromuscular control was enhanced through the implementation of strength interventions, with remarkable improvement in hip abduction and strength of external rotation (p < 0.001). The studies of balance training revealed a heterogeneity (I² = 95.6%), which suggested variability in adherence, duration, and intensity of the intervention. Conclusion: Rehabilitation programs for Common Sports Injuries resulted in the most effective functional recovery outcomes for lower limb sports injuries.

Background/Objectives: Saudi evidence on self-reported knee injuries among amateur sport participants is limited. We estimated lifetime knee injury prevalence and associated factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study used non-probability convenience sampling to recruit amateur players aged 18–60 years without chronic disease. Data were collected in 2022 using an Arabic study questionnaire and the Saudi Arabic Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The primary outcome was a broadly defined, self-reported lifetime knee injury history. Associations were estimated using logistic and Firth penalized logistic regression. Results: Of 462 submissions after the eligibility gateway, 273 were eligible and internally consistent. Most participants were male (89.4%), and football was the most frequently reported sport (74.7%). Overall, 155 participants reported a lifetime knee injury (56.8%; 95% CI 50.8–62.5%). In the adjusted model (n = 269), football participation (aOR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.35–5.13; p = 0.004) and older age (aOR per year = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.08; p = 0.023) were associated with higher odds. Estimates for male sex and high exercise intensity were imprecise. Conclusions: More than half of this convenience sample reported a lifetime knee injury. Football was the most consistent correlate. These cross-sectional findings are neither causal nor nationally representative.

Background: Radiological imaging is essential in clinical practice to support diagnosis and treatment planning. As Physical Therapists (PTs) increasingly collaborate within multidisciplinary teams, their ability to interpret radiographs has become more relevant. In Saudi Arabia, limited data exist concerning the involvement of PTs in radiological interpretation. Therefore, this study aimed to explore PTs’ engagement with radiological information, assess their attitudes, and examine the factors influencing their involvement in and interest in imaging education. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study employed a self-structured questionnaire to gather data on demographics, professional characteristics, practice patterns, learning sources, perceived barriers, and attitudes. Chi-square tests were used to assess associations, and binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of interest in further education. Results: Among the 241 PTs surveyed, 46.1% reported frequent involvement in radiological interpretation, and 83.0% believed it should be part of their professional role. Academic education was the main learning source, while 40.0% identified insufficient training as a key barrier. Engagement levels and attitudes were significantly associated with qualification, experience, workplace setting, and specialization. Notably, PTs who rarely contributed were four times more likely to express interest in further education (OR = 4.0, 95% CI: 1.5–10.4, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Many PTs in Saudi Arabia reported engaging in radiological interpretation, though the extent and accuracy of these contributions remain self-reported rather than objectively confirmed. Their involvement was influenced by education, clinical experience, and workplace setting. The findings highlight the need to integrate imaging content into national curricula and continuing professional development programs. Enhancing these competencies has the potential to strengthen collaborative care and may contribute to improved clinical decision-making and healthcare outcomes. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.