Karolos J. Kontoleon

Prof. Dr. Karolos J. Kontoleon

Laboratory of Building Construction & Building Physics, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh), University Campus, Gr-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 July 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jawad AhmadJawad Ahmad
Jawad Ahmad
Karolos J. KontoleonKarolos J. Kontoleon
Karolos J. Kontoleon
AMAli Majdi
Ali Majdi
Muhammad Tayyab NaqashMuhammad Tayyab Naqash
Muhammad Tayyab Naqash
Ahmed Mohamed HassanAhmed Mohamed Hassan
Ahmed Mohamed Hassan
SQShaker M. A. Qaidi
Shaker M. A. Qaidi
In the last few decades, the concrete industry has been massively expanded with the adoption of various kinds of binding materials. As a substitute to cement and in an effort to relieve ecofriendly difficulties linked with cement creation, the utilization of industrial waste as cementitious material can sharply reduce the amount of trash disposed of in lakes and landfills. With respect to the mechanical properties, durability and thermal behavior, ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) delineates a rational way to develop sustainable cement and concrete. Apart from environmental benefits, the replacement of cement by GGBS illustrates an adequate way to mitigate the economic impact. Although many researchers concentrate on utilizing GGBS in concrete production, knowledge is scattered, and additional research is needed to better understand relationships among a wide spectrum of key questions and to more accurately determine these preliminary findings. This work aims to shed some light on the scientific literature focusing on the use and effectiveness of GGBS as an alternative to cement. First and foremost, basic information on GGBS manufacturing and its physical, chemical and hydraulic activity and heat of hydration are thoroughly discussed. In a following step, fresh concrete properties, such as flowability and mechanical strength, are examined. Furthermore, the durability of concrete, such as density, permeability, acid resistance, carbonation depth and dry shrinkage, are also reviewed and interpreted. It can be deduced that the chemical structure of GGBS is parallel to that of cement, as it shows the creditability of being partially integrated and overall suggests an alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). On the basis of such adjustments, the mechanical strength of concrete with GGBS has shown an increase, to a certain degree; however, the flowability of concrete has been reduced. In addition, the durability of concrete containing GGBS cement is shown to be superior. The optimum percentage of GGBS is an essential aspect of better performance. Previous studies have suggested different optimum percentages of GGBS varying from 10 to 20%, depending on the source of GGBS, concrete mix design and particle size of GGBS. Finally, the review also presents some basic process improvement tips for future generations to use GGBS in concrete.

10 May 2022 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jawad AhmadJawad Ahmad
Jawad Ahmad
Karolos J. KontoleonKarolos J. Kontoleon
Karolos J. Kontoleon
MAMohammed Zuhear Al-Mulali
Mohammed Zuhear Al-Mulali
Shaik SaboorShaik Saboor
Shaik Saboor
MOMohamed Hechmi El Ouni El Ouni
Mohamed Hechmi El Ouni El Ouni
M.A. El-ShorbagyM.A. El-Shorbagy
M.A. El-Shorbagy
Concrete consumes millions of tons of cement, which causes global warming as cement factories emit huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Thus, it is essential to explore alternative materials as a substitute of OPC, which are eco-friendly and at the same time cost-effective. Although there are different options available to use industrial waste instead of cement, such as waste glass, waste marble, silica fume fly ash, or agriculture waste such as rice husk ash, wheat straw ash, etc., but bentonite clay is also one of the best options to be used as a binding material. There are a lot of diverse opinions regarding the use of bentonite clay as a cement substitute, but this knowledge is scattered, and no one can easily judge the suitability of bentonite clay as a binding material. Accordingly, a compressive review is essential to explore the suitability of bentonite clay as a cementitious material. This review focuses on the appropriateness of bentonite clay as a binding material in concrete production. The attention of this review is to discuss the physical and chemical composition of BC and the impact of BC on the fresh and mechanical performance of concrete. Furthermore, durability performance such as water absorption, acid resistance and dry shrinkage are also discussed. The results indicate that bentonite clay increased the mechanical and durability performance of concrete up to some extent but decrease its flowability. The optimum proportion of bentonite clay varies from 15 to 20% depending on the source of bentonite clay. The overall study demonstrates that bentonite clay has the creditability to be utilized partially instead of cement in concrete.

1 May 2016 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Karolos J. KontoleonKarolos J. Kontoleon
Karolos J. Kontoleon
CGC. Giarma
C. Giarma

1 November 2018 in Sustainable Cities and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBM.H. Benzaama
M.H. Benzaama
SMS. Menhoudj
S. Menhoudj
Karolos J. KontoleonKarolos J. Kontoleon
Karolos J. Kontoleon
AMA.M. Mokhtari
A.M. Mokhtari
MLM.C. Lekhal
M.C. Lekhal

24 May 2017 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPanagiotis Chastas
Panagiotis Chastas
Theodoros TheodosiouTheodoros Theodosiou
Theodoros Theodosiou
Karolos J. KontoleonKarolos J. Kontoleon
Karolos J. Kontoleon
BDBikas Dimitrios
Bikas Dimitrios
Considering the nearly zero energy building (nZEB) and the increased measures for the improvement of the energy efficiency, the international literature indicates an extended use of specialized materials and technical installations. An increase in the embodied energy follows that use, with a final share between 74% and 100% in the total life cycle energy of residential nZEBs. The current energy efficiency legislation considers only the impact from the operational phase and ignores the embodied impact from the remaining life cycle phases of the building. Nevertheless, the delegated regulation 244 of 2012 acknowledges the incompleteness of this assessment and provides an optional consideration of the embodied (“grey”) energy. The current study applies this option through the macroeconomic global cost calculations and the cost-optimal levels of nZEBs. The results indicate a limited effect of the embodied impact on the cost-optimal levels and in specific on extended calculation periods and in combination with other key parameters of the sensitivity analysis. An increase in the primary energy and a transposition to variants with lower use of materials and decreased embodied emissions follow this effect. Sensitivity analysis confirms the calculation period as a key parameter and indicates the need for further research.

2 December 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IBIasonas Bakas
Iasonas Bakas
Karolos J. KontoleonKarolos J. Kontoleon
Karolos J. Kontoleon
The multiple benefits Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) bring in terms of time expediency and reduction in required resources establish them as an extremely useful tool for engineering researchers and field practitioners. However, the blind acceptance of their predicted results needs to be avoided, and a thorough review and assessment of the output are necessary prior to adopting them in further research or field operations. This study explores the use of ANNs on a heat transfer application. It features masonry wall assemblies exposed to elevated temperatures on one side, as generated by the standard fire curve proposed by Eurocode EN1991-1-2. A juxtaposition with previously published ANN development processes and protocols is attempted, while the end results of the developed algorithms are evaluated in terms of accuracy and reliability. The significance of the careful consideration of the density and quality of input data offered to the model, in conjunction with an appropriate algorithm architecture, is highlighted. The risk of misleading metric results is also brought to attention, while useful steps for mitigating such risks are discussed. Finally, proposals for the further integration of ANNs in heat transfer research and applications are made.