Fully automated guideline-compliant diameter measurements of the thoracic aorta on ECG-gated CT angiography using deep learning Maurice Pradella, Thomas Weikert, Jonathan I. Sperl, Rainer Kärgel, Joshy Cyriac, Rita Achermann, Alexander W. Sauter, Jens Bremerich, Bram Stieltjes, Philipp Brantner, Gregor Sommer

The radiologic community is rapidly integrating a revolution that has not fully entered daily practice. It necessitates a close collaboration between computer scientists and radiologists to move from concepts to practical applications. This article reviews the current littérature on machine learning and deep neural network applications in the field of pulmonary embolism, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, aorta, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of a prototypical artificial intelligence-based algorithm for automated segmentation and diameter measurement of the thoracic aorta (TA) using CT. One hundred twenty-two patients who underwent dual-source CT were retrospectively included. Ninety-three of these patients had been administered intravenous iodinated contrast. Images were evaluated using the prototypical algorithm, which segments the TA and determines the corresponding diameters at predefined anatomical locations based on the American Heart Association guidelines. The reference standard was established by two radiologists individually in a blinded, randomized fashion. Equivalency was tested and inter-reader agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation (ICC). In total, 99.2% of the parameters measured by the prototype were assessable. In nine patients, the prototype failed to determine one diameter along the vessel. Measurements along the TA did not differ between the algorithm and readers (p > 0.05), establishing equivalence. Inter-reader agreement between the algorithm and readers (ICC ≥ 0.961; 95% CI: 0.940–0.974), and between the readers was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.879; 95% CI: 0.818–0.92). The evaluated prototypical AI-based algorithm accurately measured TA diameters at each region of interest independent of the use of either contrast utilization or pathology. This indicates that the prototypical algorithm has substantial potential as a valuable tool in the rapid clinical evaluation of aortic pathology.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) prototype application in determining bone mineral density (BMD) from chest computed tomography (CT), as compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Materials and Methods: In this Institutional Review Board–approved study, we analyzed the data of 65 patients (57 female, mean age: 67.4 y) who underwent both DEXA and chest CT (mean time between scans: 1.31 y). From the DEXA studies, T-scores for L1-L4 (lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4) were recorded. Patients were then divided on the basis of their T-scores into normal control, osteopenic, or osteoporotic groups. An AI algorithm based on wavelet features, AdaBoost, and local geometry constraints independently localized thoracic vertebrae from chest CT studies and automatically computed average Hounsfield Unit (HU) values with kVp-dependent spectral correction. The Pearson correlation evaluated the correlation between the T-scores and HU values. Mann-Whitney U test was implemented to compare the HU values of normal control versus osteoporotic patients. Results: Overall, the DEXA-determined T-scores and AI-derived HU values showed a moderate correlation (r=0.55; P<0.001). This 65-patient population was divided into 3 subgroups on the basis of their T-scores. The mean T-scores for the 3 subgroups (normal control, osteopenic, osteoporotic) were 0.77±1.50, −1.51±0.04, and −3.26±0.59, respectively. The mean DEXA-determined L1-L4 BMD measures were 1.13±0.16, 0.88±0.06, and 0.68±0.06 g/cm², respectively. The mean AI-derived attenuation values were 145±42.5, 136±31.82, and 103±16.28 HU, respectively. Using these AI-derived HU values, a significant difference was found between the normal control patients and osteoporotic group (P=0.045). Conclusion: Our results show that this AI prototype can successfully determine BMD in moderate correlation with DEXA. Combined with other AI algorithms directed at evaluating cardiac and lung diseases, this prototype may contribute to future comprehensive preventative care based on a single chest CT.