Richard Dawson

Prof. Richard Dawson

Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2016 in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMathaios Panteli
Mathaios Panteli
CPCassandra Pickering
Cassandra Pickering
SWSean Wilkinson
Sean Wilkinson
RDRichard Dawson
Richard Dawson
PMPierluigi Mancarella
Pierluigi Mancarella
Historical electrical disturbances highlight the impact of extreme weather on power system resilience. Even though the occurrence of such events is rare, the severity of their potential impact calls for developing suitable resilience assessment techniques to capture their impacts and assessing relevant strategies to mitigate them. This paper aims to provide fundamentals insights on the modeling and quantification of power systems resilience. Specifically, a fragility model of individual components and then of the whole transmission system is built for mapping the real-time impact of severe weather, with focus on wind events, on their failure probabilities. A probabilistic multitemporal and multiregional resilience assessment methodology, based on optimal power flow and sequential Monte Carlo simulation, is then introduced, allowing the assessment of the spatiotemporal impact of a windstorm moving across a transmission network. Different risk-based resilience enhancement (or adaptation) measures are evaluated, which are driven by the resilience achievement worth index of the individual transmission components. The methodology is demonstrated using a test version of the Great Britain's system. As key outputs, the results demonstrate how, by using a mix of infrastructure and operational indices, it is possible to effectively quantify system resilience to extreme weather, identify and prioritize critical network sections, whose criticality depends on the weather intensity, and assess the technical benefits of different adaptation measures to enhance resilience.

1 August 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DRDiana Reckien
Diana Reckien
Salvia MonicaSalvia Monica
Salvia Monica
Oliver HeidrichOliver Heidrich
Oliver Heidrich
JCJon Marco Church
Jon Marco Church
FPFilomena Pietrapertosa
Filomena Pietrapertosa
RDRichard Dawson
Richard Dawson

27 February 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XBXuemei Bai
Xuemei Bai
RDRichard Dawson
Richard Dawson
DÜDiana Ürge-Vorsatz
Diana Ürge-Vorsatz
Gian Carlo Delgado RamosGian Carlo Delgado Ramos
Gian Carlo Delgado Ramos
Aliyu BarauAliyu Barau
Aliyu Barau
SSSeth Schultz
Seth Schultz

1 August 2017 in Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMaria Pregnolato
Maria Pregnolato
AFAlistair Ford
Alistair Ford
SWSean M. Wilkinson
Sean M. Wilkinson
RDRichard Dawson
Richard Dawson

20 February 2018 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSelma Guerreiro
Selma Guerreiro
RDRichard Dawson
Richard Dawson
CKChris Kilsby
Chris Kilsby
ELElizabeth Lewis
Elizabeth Lewis
AFAlistair Ford
Alistair Ford

31 March 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKElmar Kriegler
Elmar Kriegler
JHJim W. Hall
Jim W. Hall
HHHermann Held
Hermann Held
RDRichard Dawson
Richard Dawson
HSHans Joachim Schellnhuber
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Major restructuring of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets, the Amazon rainforest and ENSO, are a source of concern for climate policy. We have elicited subjective probability intervals for the occurrence of such major changes under global warming from 43 scientists. Although the expert estimates highlight large uncertainty, they allocate significant probability to some of the events listed above. We deduce conservative lower bounds for the probability of triggering at least 1 of those events of 0.16 for medium (2–4 °C), and 0.56 for high global mean temperature change (above 4 °C) relative to year 2000 levels.