Ting Yue

Dr. Ting Yue

China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2013 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ting YueTing Yue
Ting Yue
RLRuyin Long
Ruyin Long
Hong ChenHong Chen
Hong Chen

1 May 2017 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHui Lu
Hui Lu
XLXia Liu
Xia Liu
Hong ChenHong Chen
Hong Chen
RLRuyin Long
Ruyin Long
Ting YueTing Yue
Ting Yue

1 December 2013 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ting YueTing Yue
Ting Yue
RLRuyin Long
Ruyin Long
Hong ChenHong Chen
Hong Chen
XZXin Zhao
Xin Zhao

25 March 2020 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ting YueTing Yue
Ting Yue
HLHaiwen Liu
Haiwen Liu
Ruyin LongRuyin Long
Ruyin Long
Hong ChenHong Chen
Hong Chen
XGXin Gan
Xin Gan
JLJunli Liu
Junli Liu

1 September 2014 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RYRanran Yang
Ranran Yang
Ruyin LongRuyin Long
Ruyin Long
Ting YueTing Yue
Ting Yue
HSHaihong Shi
Haihong Shi

18 January 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJichao Geng
Jichao Geng
Ruyin LongRuyin Long
Ruyin Long
DGDaoyan Guo
Daoyan Guo
Ting YueTing Yue
Ting Yue
Wenbo LiWenbo Li
Wenbo Li
Qianwen LiQianwen Li
Qianwen Li
People’s actions are always accompanied with multiple motives. How to estimate the role of the pro-environment motivation under the interference of other motivations will help us to better interpret human environmental behaviors. On the basis of classical motivation theories and travel mode choice research backgrounds, the concepts of pro-environmental and self-interested motivation were defined. Then based on survey data on 1244 urban residents in the Jiangsu Province in China, the multinomial logistic regression model was constructed to examine the effects of multiple motivations, government measures, and demographic characteristics on residents’ travel mode choice behaviors. The result indicates that compared to car use, pro-environmental motivation certainly has a significant and positive role in promoting green travel mode choices (walking, bicycling, and using public transport), but this unstable green behavior is always dominated by self-interested motivations rather than the pro-environmental motivation. In addition, the effects of gender, age, income, vehicle ownership, travel distance, and government instruments show significant differences among travel mode choices. The findings suggest that pro-environmental motivation needs to be stressed and highlighted to ensure sustainable urban transportation. However, policies aimed to only increase the public awareness of environment protection are not enough; tailored policy interventions should be targeted to specific groups having different main motivations.