In Brazil, 65% of the electric power production comes from hydroelectric power plants (HPPs). In some cases, these power plants divert the course of rivers, resulting in regions impacted by the absence of water, which are known as reduced fow sections (RFS). These sections are regulated by legislation and aim to maintain the minimum fow necessary to preserve the fauna, flora, fish, and human consumption in the region. Depending on the time of year, this minimum flow, also known as ecological flow (residual flow), can reach significant values, resulting in the interruption of power generation in these HPPs. This article presents a study case of two hydroelectric power plants located in different Brazilian states. The objective of this study is to explore the feasibility of implementing auxiliary generator groups that can operate uninterruptedly at different drop heights while ensuring the preservation of residual flow during low flow periods or taking advantage of the overflow flow by spillways during high flow periods. This auxiliary system would use the same set of structures and transmission systems as the main power plant, minimizing environmental impacts and implementation costs, allowing this solution to be implemented in HPPs that face this type of problem in Brazil. The results obtained indicate that HPPs with larger reservoirs have a greater ability to maintain residual flows with minimal generation loss and that run-of-the-river power plants are the most impacted by the maintenance of residual flow.

As variable renewable generation grows, intermittent dispatch of run-of-river hydropower plants may transfer required environmental-flow releases from turbines to spillways, creating conditions that favor total dissolved gas (TDG) supersaturation and may constrain hydropower flexibility. This study presents a reproducible basin-scale screening assessment for 24 selected hydropower plants in the Brazilian Amazon and Tocantins–Araguaia basins. The analysis combines a plant inventory, spillway typology, standardized environmental-flow scenarios, and two configuration-specific linear relationships between unit discharge and the increase in TDG saturation (ΔTDG), derived from digitized Pubugou and Gongzui observations. Two release configurations were examined: flow distributed among all available bays and flow concentrated in a single bay as a theoretical hydraulic bounding case. The Pubugou-based relationship was applied only to broadly comparable ski-jump configurations within 9.1 ≤ UD ≤ 72.3 m³ m⁻¹ s⁻¹, whereas the Gongzui-based relationship was provisionally assigned, as an inventory-level first-order analog, to controlled spillways discharging into stilling basins within 34.6 ≤ UD ≤ 234.6 m³ m⁻¹ s⁻¹. Hydraulically dissimilar cases were classified as NE-H, and cases outside the applicable empirical domain as NE-UD. Digitization sensitivity, regression uncertainty, and model-form selection were explicitly evaluated and documented. None of the distributed-flow scenarios produced a numerical estimate: cases assigned to the Pubugou- or Gongzui-based relationships were classified as NE-UD, whereas hydraulically dissimilar free-surface cases were classified as NE-H. Four single-bay scenarios produced configuration-specific $\Delta \mathrm{T}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{G}$ increments: 22.5–33.4 percentage points for three Gongzui-based cases and 13.6 percentage points for one Pubugou-based case. Upstream TDG was not added, and no plant-specific final concentration or universal ranking was reported. Sinop and Colíder observations were retained as qualitative contextual evidence of limited transferability and the importance of site-specific hydraulics. The outputs support conditional monitoring prioritization under standardized assumptions, not compliance prediction, ecological-risk assessment, or gate-operation recommendations. Synchronized monitoring and plant-specific rating curves are required before TDG-related variables can be incorporated into operational planning.