Alaa Al Hawari

Dr. Alaa Al Hawari


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 April 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IIIbrar Ibrar
Ibrar Ibrar
ONOsamah Naji
Osamah Naji
ASAdel Sharif
Adel Sharif
AMAli Malekizadeh
Ali Malekizadeh
AHAlaa Al Hawari
Alaa Al Hawari
Ali AltaeeAli Altaee
Ali Altaee
Forward osmosis has gained tremendous attention in the field of desalination and wastewater treatment. However, membrane fouling is an inevitable issue. Membrane fouling leads to flux decline, can cause operational problems and can result in negative consequences that can damage the membrane. Hereby, we attempt to review the different types of fouling in forward osmosis, cleaning and control strategies for fouling mitigation, and the impact of membrane hydrophilicity, charge and morphology on fouling. The fundamentals of biofouling, organic, colloidal and inorganic fouling are discussed with a focus on recent studies. We also review some of the in-situ real-time online fouling monitoring technologies for real-time fouling monitoring that can be applicable to future research on forward osmosis fouling studies. A brief discussion on critical flux and the coupled effects of fouling and concentration polarization is also provided.

6 January 2021 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DEDina Ewis
Dina Ewis
NINorhan Ashraf Ismail
Norhan Ashraf Ismail
MHMhdAmmar Hafiz
MhdAmmar Hafiz
ABAbdelbaki Benamor
Abdelbaki Benamor
AHAlaa Al Hawari
Alaa Al Hawari
Membrane technologies are used intensively for desalination and wastewater treatment. Water filtration using ceramic membranes exhibited high performance compared with polymeric membranes due to various properties such as high resistance to fouling, permeability, rejection rate, and chemical stability. Recently, the performance of nanocomposite ceramic membranes was improved due to the development in nanotechnology. This article focusses on the development of porous ceramic membranes and nanomaterial functionalized ceramic membranes for water filtration applications. At the beginning, various fabrication methods of ceramic membranes were described, and the effect of surface modification techniques on the membrane intrinsic properties was reviewed. Then, the performance of nanoparticles functionalized ceramic membranes was evaluated in terms of physicochemical properties, rejection rate, and water permeability. This work can help new entrants and established researchers to become familiar with the current challenges and developments of nanoparticle-incorporated ceramic membranes for water filtration applications.

2 January 2021 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMhdAmmar Hafiz
MhdAmmar Hafiz
AHAlaa Al Hawari
Alaa Al Hawari
RARadwan Alfahel
Radwan Alfahel
Mohammad HassanMohammad Hassan
Mohammad Hassan
Ali AltaeeAli Altaee
Ali Altaee
This study compares the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) for the reclamation of ultrafiltered municipal wastewater for irrigation of food crops. RO and NF technologies were evaluated at different applied pressures; the performance of each technology was evaluated in terms of water flux, recovery rate, specific energy consumption and quality of permeate. It was found that the permeate from the reverse osmosis (RO) process complied with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) standards at pressures applied between 10 and 18 bar. At an applied pressure of 20 bar, the permeate quality did not comply with irrigation water standards in terms of chloride, sodium and calcium concentration. It was found that nanofiltration process was not suitable for the reclamation of wastewater as the concentration of chloride, sodium and calcium exceeded the allowable limits at all applied pressures. In the reverse osmosis process, the highest recovery rate was 36%, which was achieved at a pressure of 16 bar. The specific energy consumption at this applied pressure was 0.56 kWh/m3. The lowest specific energy of 0.46 kWh/m3 was achieved at an applied pressure of 12 bar with a water recovery rate of 32.7%.

25 May 2020 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYSudesh Yadav
Sudesh Yadav
IIIbrar Ibrar
Ibrar Ibrar
SBSalam Bakly
Salam Bakly
DKDaoud khanafer
Daoud khanafer
Ali AltaeeAli Altaee
Ali Altaee
AHAlaa Al Hawari
Alaa Al Hawari
Organic fouling in the forward osmosis process is complex and influenced by different parameters in the forward osmosis such as type of feed and draw solution, operating conditions, and type of membrane. In this article, we reviewed organic fouling in the forward osmosis by focusing on wastewater treatment applications. Model organic foulants used in the forward osmosis literature were highlighted, which were followed by the characteristics of organic foulants when real wastewater was used as feed solution. The various physical and chemical cleaning protocols for the organic fouled membrane are also discussed. The study also highlighted the effective pre-treatment strategies that are effective in reducing the impact of organic fouling on the forward osmosis (FO) membrane. The efficiency of cleaning methods for the removal of organic fouling in the FO process was investigated, including recommendations on future cleaning technologies such as Ultraviolet and Ultrasound. Generally, a combination of physical and chemical cleaning is the best for restoring the water flux in the FO process.

19 January 2021 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jasir JawadJasir Jawad
Jasir Jawad
AHAlaa Al Hawari
Alaa Al Hawari
syed Zaidisyed Zaidi
syed Zaidi
The forward osmosis (FO) process is an emerging technology that has been considered as an alternative to desalination due to its low energy consumption and less severe reversible fouling. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and response surface methodology (RSM) have become popular for the modeling and optimization of membrane processes. RSM requires the data on a specific experimental design whereas ANN does not. In this work, a combined ANN-RSM approach is presented to predict and optimize the membrane flux for the FO process. The ANN model, developed based on an experimental study, is used to predict the membrane flux for the experimental design in order to create the RSM model for optimization. A Box–Behnken design (BBD) is used to develop a response surface design where the ANN model evaluates the responses. The input variables were osmotic pressure difference, feed solution (FS) velocity, draw solution (DS) velocity, FS temperature, and DS temperature. The R2 obtained for the developed ANN and RSM model are 0.98036 and 0.9408, respectively. The weights of the ANN model and the response surface plots were used to optimize and study the influence of the operating conditions on the membrane flux.

28 July 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShoyeb Khan
Shoyeb Khan
PDProbir Das
Probir Das
MHMohammed Abdul Quadir MD Hakim
Mohammed Abdul Quadir MD Hakim
MTMahmoud Thaher
Mahmoud Thaher
SNSenthil Nagappan
Senthil Nagappan
HAHareb Aljabri
Hareb Aljabri