Asmat Ullah

Dr. Asmat Ullah

Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 August 2018 in Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IAIshfaq Ahmad
Ishfaq Ahmad
USUmer Saeed
Umer Saeed
MFMuhammad Fahad
Muhammad Fahad
Asmat UllahAsmat Ullah
Asmat Ullah
MRMuhammad Habib ur Rahman
Muhammad Habib ur Rahman
JJJasmeet Judge
Jasmeet Judge

7 August 2018 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IAIshfaq Ahmad
Ishfaq Ahmad
MRMuhammad Habib ur Rahman
Muhammad Habib ur Rahman
SAShakeel Ahmed
Shakeel Ahmed
JHJamshad Hussain
Jamshad Hussain
Asmat UllahAsmat Ullah
Asmat Ullah
JJJasmeet Judge
Jasmeet Judge

22 July 2023 in SN Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMuhammad Waseem
Muhammad Waseem
SASareer Ahmad
Sareer Ahmad
IAIzhar Ahmad
Izhar Ahmad
HWHira Wahab
Hira Wahab
MLMegersa Kebede Leta
Megersa Kebede Leta
The rapid urbanization and changing climate patterns in Swat, Pakistan have increased the vulnerability of urban areas to flood events. Accurate assessment of flood risk is crucial for effective urban planning and disaster management. In current research study flood hazard index was developed using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique in combination with the geographical information system (GIS) environment in Swat, Pakistan. The study integrates various data sources, including topographic maps, land use/land cover information, rainfall data, and infrastructure data, to develop a comprehensive flood risk assessment model. The weights obtained from the AHP analysis are combined with geospatial data using a geographic information system (GIS) to generate flood risk maps. The flood hazard levels were categorized into five distinct classes: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Using the GIS-AHP approach, higher weights were assigned to rainfall, distance to river, elevation, and slope in comparison to NDVI, TWI, LULC, curvature, and soil type. The flood hazard map was then reclassified for each parameter. By overlaying these maps, it was determined that 5.6% of the total area is classified as very high flood risk, 52% as high risk, 39.3% as moderate risk, and 3.1% as low risk. The developed comprehensive flood risk assessment model in current study can identify high-risk areas, prioritize mitigation measures, and aid in effective urban planning and disaster management.

1 April 2017 in Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Asmat UllahAsmat Ullah
Asmat Ullah
AAAshfaq Ahmad
Ashfaq Ahmad
Tasneem KhaliqTasneem Khaliq
Tasneem Khaliq
JAJavaid Akhtar
Javaid Akhtar

10 January 2019 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Asmat UllahAsmat Ullah
Asmat Ullah
IAIshfaq Ahmad
Ishfaq Ahmad
AAAshfaq Ahmad
Ashfaq Ahmad
TKTasneem Khaliq
Tasneem Khaliq
USUmer Saeed
Umer Saeed
GHGerrit Hoogenboom
Gerrit Hoogenboom

13 February 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAmjad Masood
Amjad Masood
Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman TariqMuhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq
Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq
MHMuhammad Zia Ur Rahman Hashmi
Muhammad Zia Ur Rahman Hashmi
MWMuhammad Waseem
Muhammad Waseem
MSMuhammad Kaleem Sarwar
Muhammad Kaleem Sarwar
Anne NgAnne Ng
Anne Ng
Groundwater supplies approximately half of the total global domestic water demand. It also complements the seasonal and annual variabilities of surface water. Monitoring of groundwater fluctuations is mandatory to envisage the composition of terrestrial water storage. This research provides an overview of traditional techniques and detailed discussion on the modern tools and methods to monitor groundwater fluctuations along with advanced applications. The groundwater monitoring can broadly be classified into three groups. The first one is characterized by the point measurement to measure the groundwater levels using classical instruments and electronic and physical investigation techniques. The second category involves the extensive use of satellite data to ensure robust and cost-effective real-time monitoring to assess the groundwater storage variations. Many satellite data are in use to find groundwater indirectly. However, GRACE satellite data supported with other satellite products, computational tools, GIS techniques, and hydro-climate models have proven the most effective for groundwater resources management. The third category is groundwater numerical modeling, which is a very useful tool to evaluate and project groundwater resources in future. Groundwater numerical modeling also depends upon the point-based groundwater monitoring, so more research to improve point-based detection methods using latest technologies is required, as these still play the baseline role. GRACE and numerical groundwater modeling are suggested to be used conjunctively to assess the groundwater resources more efficiently.