Artur Andruszkiewicz

Dr. Artur Andruszkiewicz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 March 2013 in The European Physical Journal Special Topics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JFJochen Fröhlich
Jochen Fröhlich
SSS. Schwarz
S. Schwarz
SHS. Heitkam
S. Heitkam
CSC. Santarelli
C. Santarelli
CZC. Zhang
C. Zhang
SES. Eckert
S. Eckert

26 March 2013 in The European Physical Journal Special Topics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAArtur Andruszkiewicz
Artur Andruszkiewicz
KEKerstin Eckert
Kerstin Eckert
SESven Eckert
Sven Eckert
SOStefan Odenbach
Stefan Odenbach

1 March 2024 in Journal of Ecological Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
nabil I. beithounabil I. beithou
nabil I. beithou
MKMohammad Bani Khalid
Mohammad Bani Khalid
SASamer As’aD
Samer As’aD
SASameh Alsaqoor
Sameh Alsaqoor
GBGabriel Borowski
Gabriel Borowski
AAArtur Andruszkiewicz
Artur Andruszkiewicz
Atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) devices represent a fruitful hope to cope with water shortage problem throughout the world. The vast development in AWH technology and the wide spread of the various AWH techniques will largely contribute in the implementation of AWH machines in different...

28 August 2018 in Journal of Thermal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPiotr Piechota
Piotr Piechota
PSPiotr Krzysztof Synowiec
Piotr Krzysztof Synowiec
AAArtur Andruszkiewicz
Artur Andruszkiewicz
WWWiesław Wędrychowicz
Wiesław Wędrychowicz

28 January 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPiotr Krzysztof Synowiec
Piotr Krzysztof Synowiec
AAArtur Andruszkiewicz
Artur Andruszkiewicz
WWWiesław Wędrychowicz
Wiesław Wędrychowicz
PPPiotr Krzysztof Piechota
Piotr Krzysztof Piechota
EWElżbieta Wróblewska
Elżbieta Wróblewska
The subject matter of the article concerns velocities/flow rate measurements in the area of disturbed flows-behind the 90° bend. They were conducted by means of an ultrasonic flowmeter with clamp-on sensors on pipeline, for water and two different Reynolds numbers of 70,000 and 100,000, corresponding to two velocities of approximately 1.42 m/s and 2.04 m/s. The tests were carried out at 12 distances from the disturbance. Sensors on the circumference of the pipeline were mounted 30° each. The correction factor values were calculated for the given measurement geometry. The measurements have shown that the values of this coefficient are always greater than 1, which means that the ultrasonic flow meter understates the speed values. They also showed that already at a distance of 8 nominal diameters from the disturbance, the correction factor does not exceed 1.02, so the measurement errors are within the maximum permissible error (MPE) of a typical ultrasonic flow meter. For distances less than eight nominal diameters from the disturbance, not taking the correction factor value into the account can lead to systematic errors of up to 10.8%. Studies have also proved that in each measurement plane behind the disturbance there are two mounting angles for the ultrasonic sensors, 60° and 240° respectively, for which the correction factor values are minimal. Additionally, using the laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) method, velocity solids were determined at individual distances from the disturbance, and the projections of velocity blocks on the appropriate plane represented velocity profiles and indicated the distances from the disturbance at which these profiles stabilise.

5 October 2012 in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TVTobias Vogt
Tobias Vogt
AAArtur Andruszkiewicz
Artur Andruszkiewicz
SESven Eckert
Sven Eckert
KEKerstin Eckert
Kerstin Eckert
SOStefan Odenbach
Stefan Odenbach
GGGunter Gerbeth
Gunter Gerbeth