Surface acoustic wave magnetic field sensors based on guided Love waves using the ΔE effect of a magnetostrictive thin film have been shown to be promising candidates for the measurement of weak fields at low frequencies as required for biomagnetic applications or as current sensors benefitting from the large dynamic range and bandwidth. The deposition of soft magnetic films with high magnetostriction is, however, more challenging on piezoelectric substrates such as quartz than on silicon. Thermally induced anisotropic expansion during the deposition process or during post-deposition magnetic field annealing leads to uniaxial stresses acting on the films, which makes the precise control of magnetic anisotropy difficult. Accordingly, this work analyzes the influence of the deposition process and heat treatment on the performance of Love wave devices. ST-cut quartz based delay line surface acoustic wave sensors with a SiO2 guiding layer are employed, and a 200 nm layer of amorphous magnetostrictive (Fe90Co10)78Si12B10 is used as the sensitive element. Magneto-optical imaging is performed for magnetic domain characterization, and the sensor performance is characterized in terms of bias field dependent phase sensitivity and frequency dependent phase noise. By performing a low temperature deposition in an external magnetic field, considerable improvement in limits of detection at biomagnetic relevant frequencies down to 70 at 10 Hz and 25 at 100 Hz is achieved.
1 August 2020 in Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
A surface-acoustic-wave (SAW) magnetic-field sensor utilizing fundamental, first- and second-order Love-wave modes is investigated. A SiO2 guiding layer on an ST-cut quartz substrate is coated with a 200 (Fe90Co10)78Si12B10 magnetostrictive layer in a delay-line configuration. Love-waves are excited and detected by two interdigital transducers (IDT). The delta-E effect in the magnetostrictive layer causes a phase change with applied magnetic field. A sensitivity of 1250 / is measured for the fundamental Love mode at 263 . For the first-order Love mode a value of 45 / is obtained at 352 . This result is compared to finite-element-method (FEM) simulations using one-dimensional (1D) and two-and-a-half-dimensional (2.5 D) models. The FEM simulations confirm the large drop in sensitivity as the first-order mode is close to cut-off. For multi-mode operation, we identify as a suitable geometry a guiding layer to wavelength ratio of for an IDT pitch of . For this layer configuration, the first three modes are sufficiently far away from cut-off and show good sensitivity.
In this work, the first surface acoustic-wave-based magnetic field sensor using thin-film AlScN as piezoelectric material deposited on a silicon substrate is presented. The fabrication is based on standard semiconductor technology. The acoustically active area consists of an AlScN layer that can be excited with interdigital transducers, a smoothing SiO2 layer, and a magnetostrictive FeCoSiB film. The detection limit of this sensor is 2.4 nT/ at 10 Hz and 72 pT/ at 10 kHz at an input power of 20 dBm. The dynamic range was found to span from about 1.7 mT to the corresponding limit of detection, leading to an interval of about 8 orders of magnitude. Fabrication, achieved sensitivity, and noise floor of the sensors are presented.
Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors for the detection of magnetic fields are currently being studied scientifically in many ways, especially since both their sensitivity as well as their detectivity could be significantly improved by the utilization of shear horizontal surface acoustic waves, i.e., Love waves, instead of Rayleigh waves. By now, low-frequency limits of detection (LOD) below 100 pT/ can be achieved. However, the LOD can only be further improved by gaining a deep understanding of the existing sensor-intrinsic noise sources and their impact on the sensor’s overall performance. This paper reports on a comprehensive study of the inherent noise of SAW delay line magnetic field sensors. In addition to the noise, however, the sensitivity is of importance, since both quantities are equally important for the LOD. Following the necessary explanations of the electrical and magnetic sensor properties, a further focus is on the losses within the sensor, since these are closely linked to the noise. The considered parameters are in particular the ambient magnetic bias field and the input power of the sensor. Depending on the sensor’s operating point, various noise mechanisms contribute to white phase noise, flicker phase noise, and random walk of phase. Flicker phase noise due to magnetic hysteresis losses, i.e. random fluctuations of the magnetization, is usually dominant under typical operating conditions. Noise characteristics are related to the overall magnetic and magnetic domain behavior. Both calculations and measurements show that the LOD cannot be further improved by increasing the sensitivity. Instead, the losses occurring in the magnetic material need to be decreased.
Transmission surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors are widely used in various fields of application. In order to improve the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is essential to understand and quantify the relevant noise sources. Only then, strategies for noise reduction can be developed. In this paper, low noise readout systems for the application with SAW sensors in an open-loop and a closed-loop configuration are presented and experimentally investigated with regard to their phase noise on the example of a SAW delay line magnetic field sensor. Besides a comprehensive analysis of the phaseand frequency modulated signals, respectively, previously derived equations in a theoretic study for describing the LOD of both readout structures are utilized in the experimental context. According to the theory, the same LOD is also obtained in the experiment for all frequencies for which the noise contributions of the readout electronics are negligible. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study that directly compares both operating modes for the same sensor and in terms of the overall achievable LOD. The results are applicable to all kinds of phase-sensitive delay-line sensors.