Structures and bridges are being designed on the proposed and requested design lifetime of 50 to 100 years. In practice, one can see that the real lifetime of structures and bridges is shorter in many cases, in some special cases extremely shorter. The reasons for the lifetime shortening can be increased of the load cases (e.g., due to traffic on bridges, or due to other uses of a structure), using the material of lower quality, implementation of new standards and codes according to Eurocode replacing older ones. During the whole lifetime the structures must be maintained to fulfil the code requests. If the constructions are not able to fulfil the Ultimate Limit States (ULS) and the Serviceability Limit State (SLS), the structures or bridges have to be strengthened (whole or its elements). The purpose of the paper is the presentation of using a layer of the fibre concrete for a columns’ strengthening. Using the fibre reinforced concrete (FRC) of higher tensile strength makes it possible to increase the load-bearing capacity of the cross-section the column. The contact between the old concrete (core of column) and newly added layer (around column) is very important for using that method of strengthening. In the article, there is also a comparison of the surface modification methods.

In the case of prestressed concrete structures, information about the actual state of prestressing is an important basis for determining their load-carrying capacity as well as remaining service life. During the service life of the prestressed concrete structure, the initial level of prestressing is inevitably reduced as a result of the actions of various factors. These reductions of prestressing force are considered as prestress losses, which are influenced by construction stages, used materials, prestressing technology, or required length of service life. Available standards enable the determination of the expected values of prestress losses. Ultimately, their calculation is part of the design procedure of every prestressed concrete structure. However, aging and often neglected infrastructure in Europe is also exposed to factors, such as environmental distress, that are not considered in standard calculations. Therefore, verified and reliable methods for determining the actual state of prestressing are needed. This paper presents an experimental program of an indirect method for the evaluation of the value of prestressing force in seven prestressed concrete sleepers. Particularly, the non-destructive saw-cut method as a pivotal object of this study is performed and assessed. Furthermore, the Barkhausen noise technique is used as a comparative method. Subsequently, the experimental campaign is supported by the numerical analysis performed in the ATENA 3D software. Finally, the experimentally determined values of residual prestressing force are compared to the expected level of prestressing according to Eurocodes.

The paper presents an extensive study aimed to determine the applicability of the demountable Bailey bridge (BB) system on construction sites or in other temporary conditions while meeting the regulations for the design and assessment of steel bridges. The analysis is focused on whether and to what extent the BB system with spans between 12 and 36 m is usable for on-site freight transport with conventional lorries with a total weight of up to 22–28 tons. At the same time, the BB system within these spans should be utilized for construction vehicles with a total weight of up to 32–40 tons. To calculate the load-carrying capacity, spatial numerical models were analysed using FEM and procedures of actual design codes were utilized. In the case of the main girders, analysis is focused on the out-of-plane stability of their compressed chords. Recommendations for the use of this bridge system in different arrangements of the main girder and bridge deck are then summarized and discussed.

These elements are innovative and of interest to many researchers for the reinforcement of wooden elements. For the reinforced beam elements, the effect of the reinforcement factor, FRP and steel elastic modulus or FRP and steel arrangement of the reinforcement on the performance of the flexural elements was determined, followed by reading the load-displacement diagram of the reinforced beam elements. The finite element model was then developed and verified with the experimental results, which was mainly related to the fact that the general theory took into account the typical tensile failure mode, which can be used to predict the flexural strength of reinforced timber beams. From the tests, it was determined that reinforced timber beam elements had relatively ductile flexural strengths up to brittle tension for unreinforced elements. As for the reinforcements of FRP, the highest increase in load-bearing capacity was for carbon mats at 52.47%, with a reinforcement grade of 0.43%, while the lowest was for glass mats at 16.62% with a reinforcement grade of 0.22%. Basalt bars achieved the highest stiffness, followed by glass mats. Taking into account all the reinforcements used, the highest stiffness was demonstrated by the tests of the effectiveness of the reinforcement using 3 mm thick steel plates. For this configuration with a reinforcement percentage of 10%, this increase in load capacity was 79.48% and stiffness was 31.08%. The difference between the experimental and numerical results was within 3.62–27.36%, respectively.

Reinforced concrete (RC) structures are basically composite elements because they consist of two materials—concrete and reinforcement (reinforcing steel bars). From the point of view of the design of new constructions, it is necessary to design them in such a way as to ensure their reliability, safety and durability throughout their design lifetime, T_d. However, all elements, including RC members, are affected by the environment in which they are located. An aggressive environment causes degradation of materials. In the case of reinforcement, corrosion of the reinforcement is considered to be the most well-known and at the same time the most serious way of degradation. From the point of view of existing reinforced concrete elements, it is therefore important to know whether and how the corrosion of the reinforcement affects the mechanical properties of the given reinforcement. The mechanical properties of reinforcement are very important when assessing the actual condition of reinforced concrete (RC) elements, to determine the resistance and load-carrying capacity of the elements. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effect of corrosion on mechanical properties of reinforcement. The paper reports on the results of an experimental analysis of the effect of corrosion on the change in the mechanical properties of reinforcement. Furthermore, it presents both the redistribution of mechanical properties along the cross-section of reinforcement, produced by various techniques, such as hot-rolling, hot-rolling with controlled cooling from rerolling temperature and cold-rolled as well as the mechanical properties under the action of corrosion.

The use of composite precast or steel bars as reinforcements for timber beams is an important technique that can improve effectiveness or allow cross sections to be reduced. This paper presents experimental, theoretical, and numerical studies of full-size timber beams measuring 82 × 162 × 3650 mm³ using prestressed steel bars and 10 mm diameter basalt and glass bars with a prestress of 10 MPa. In addition, parametric studies were carried out using FEM numerical simulations. In the experimental tests, an increase in load-bearing capacity and stiffness of up to 58% and 10.7% for steel bars, 32% and 10.1% for basalt bars, and 27% and 7.8% for glass bars, respectively, was obtained compared to unreinforced beams. The different levels of improvement in reinforcement efficiency was also related to the different elastic modulus of the reinforcement itself. Unreinforced beams showed a linear elastic range. In contrast, on beams reinforced with steel bars, the curve had a slightly steeper line than the control beam, and the slope of the curve then decreased when a certain load was reached. All beams failed when the lower wood fibers reached maximum tensile strain. The allowable compressive strain then decreased by 36.6% for basalt bars, 32.9% for glass bars, and 30.4% for steel bars. The use of prestressing further exploited the strength of the reinforcement beyond the yield point. All unreinforced beams primarily failed in the tension zone due to fracture of the timber fibers. Prestressed and reinforced beams were already failing due to bending and shear. The experimental and numerical analysis was also compared, and the results showed a good agreement and a maximum difference of approximately 5.7%.