This study introduces an innovative computational approach using hybrid machine learning models to predict toxicity across eight critical end points: cardiac toxicity, inhalation toxicity, dermal toxicity, oral toxicity, skin irritation, skin sensitization, eye irritation, and respiratory irritation. Leveraging advanced cheminformatics tools, we extracted relevant features from curated data sets, incorporating a range of descriptors such as Morgan circular fingerprints, MACCS keys, Mordred calculation descriptors, and physicochemical properties. The consensus model was developed by selecting the best-performing classifier-Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), or Support Vector Machines (SVM)-for each descriptor, optimizing predictive accuracy and robustness across the end points. The model obtained strong predictive performance, with area under the curve (AUC) scores ranging from 0.78 to 0.90. This framework offers a reliable, ethical, and effective in silico approach to chemical safety assessment, underscoring the potential of advanced computational methods to support both regulatory and research applications in toxicity prediction.

Objectives: Objective detection of brainstem responses to natural speech stimuli is an important tool for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting, especially in people who may not be able to respond reliably in behavioral tests. Of particular interest is the envelope frequency following response (eFFR), which refers to the EEG response at the stimulus’ fundamental frequency (and its harmonics), and here in particular to the response to natural spoken vowel sounds. This article introduces the frequency-domain Hotelling’s T² (HT2) method for eFFR detection. This method was compared, in terms of sensitivity in detecting eFFRs at the fundamental frequency (HT2_F0), to two different single-channel frequency domain methods (F test on Fourier analyzer (FA) amplitude spectra [FA-F-Test] and magnitude-squared coherence [MSC]) in detecting envelope following responses to natural vowel stimuli in simulated data and EEG data from normal-hearing subjects. Sensitivity was assessed based on the number of detections and the time needed to detect a response for a false-positive rate of 5%. The study also explored whether a single-channel, multifrequency HT2 (HT2_3F) and a multichannel, multifrequency HT2 (HT2_MC) could further improve response detection. Design: Four repeated words were presented sequentially at 70 dB SPL LAeq through ER-2 insert earphones. The stimuli consisted of a prolonged vowel in a /hVd/ structure (where V represents different vowel sounds). Each stimulus was presented over 440 sweeps (220 condensation and 220 rarefaction). EEG data were collected from 12 normal-hearing adult participants. After preprocessing and artifact removal, eFFR detection was compared between the algorithms. For the simulation study, simulated EEG signals were generated by adding random noise at multiple signal to noise ratios (SNRs; 0 to −60dB) to the auditory stimuli as well as to a single sinusoid at the fluctuating and flattened fundamental frequency (f₀). For each SNR, 1000 sets of 440 simulated epochs were generated. Performance of the algorithms was assessed based on the number of sets for which a response could be detected at each SNR. Results: In simulation studies, HT2_3F significantly outperformed the other algorithms when detecting a vowel stimulus in noise. For simulations containing responses only at a single frequency, HT2_3F performs worse compared with other approaches applied in this study as the additional frequencies included do not contain additional information. For recorded EEG data, HT2_MC showed a significantly higher response detection rate compared with MSC and FA-F-Test. Both HT2_MC and HT2_F0 also showed a significant reduction in detection time compared with the FA-F-Test algorithm. Comparisons between different electrode locations confirmed a higher number of detections for electrodes close to Cz compared to more peripheral locations. Conclusion: The HT2 method is more sensitive than FA-F-Test and MSC in detecting responses to complex stimuli because it allows detection of multiple frequencies (HT2_F3) and multiple EEG channels (HT2_MC) simultaneously. This effect was shown in simulation studies for HT2_3F and in EEG data for the HT2_MC algorithm. The spread in detection time across subjects is also lower for the HT2 algorithm, with decision on the presence of an eFFR possible within 5 min.

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) targeting complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) detected by automated algorithms has produced conflicting outcomes in previous electrophysiological studies. We hypothesize that the differences in these algorithms could lead to discordant CFAE classifications by the available mapping systems, giving rise to potential disparities in CFAE-guided ablation. This study reports the results of a head-to-head comparison of CFAE detection performed by NavX (St. Jude Medical) versus CARTO (Biosense Webster) on the same bipolar electrogram data (797 electrograms) from 18 persAF patients. We propose revised thresholds for both primary and complementary indices to minimize the differences in CFAE classification performed by either system. Using the default thresholds [NavX: CFE-Mean ≤ 120 ms; CARTO: ICL ≥ 7], NavX classified 70 % of the electrograms as CFAEs, while CARTO detected 36 % (Cohen’s kappa κ ≈ 0.3, P < 0.0001). Using revised thresholds found using receiver operating characteristic curves [NavX: CFE-Mean ≤ 84 ms, CFE-SD ≤ 47 ms; CARTO: ICL ≥ 4, ACI ≤ 82 ms, SCI ≤ 58 ms], NavX classified 45 %, while CARTO detected 42 % (κ ≈ 0.5, P < 0.0001). Our results show that CFAE target identification is dependent on the system and thresholds used by the electrophysiological study. The thresholds found in this work counterbalance the differences in automated CFAE classification performed by each system. This could facilitate comparisons of CFAE ablation outcomes guided by either NavX or CARTO in future works.

Background and Objective: Optimal targets for persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) ablation are still debated. Atrial regions hosting high dominant frequency (HDF) are believed to participate in the initiation and maintenance of persAF and hence are potential targets for ablation, while rotor ablation has shown promising initial results. Currently, no commercially available system offers the capability to automatically identify both these phenomena. This paper describes an integrated 3D software platform combining the mapping of both frequency spectrum and phase from atrial electrograms (AEGs) to help guide persAF ablation in clinical cardiac electrophysiological studies. Methods: 30 s of 2048 non-contact AEGs (EnSite Array, St. Jude Medical) were collected and analyzed per patient. After QRST removal, the AEGs were divided into 4 s windows with a 50% overlap. Fast Fourier transform was used for DF identification. HDF areas were identified as the maximum DF to 0.25 Hz below that, and their centers of gravity (CGs) were used to track their spatiotemporal movement. Spectral organization measurements were estimated. Hilbert transform was used to calculate instantaneous phase. Results: The system was successfully used to guide catheter ablation for 10 persAF patients. The mean processing time was 10.4 +/- 1.5 min, which is adequate comparing to the normal electrophysiological (EP) procedure time (120 similar to 180 min). Conclusions: A customized software platform capable of measuring different forms of spatiotemporal AEG analysis was implemented and used in clinical environment to guide persAF ablation. The modular nature of the platform will help electrophysiological studies in understanding of the underlying AF mechanisms. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and it is associated with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and mortality. This work describes spectral analysis techniques that are being used in conjunction with visualization algorithms to help guide catheter ablation procedures that aim at treating patients with arrhythmia.