Forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon due to selective logging and forest fires may greatly increase the human footprint beyond outright deforestation. We demonstrate a method to quantify annual deforestation and degradation simultaneously across the entire region for the years 2000–2010 using high-resolution Landsat satellite imagery. Combining spectral mixture analysis, normalized difference fraction index, and knowledge-based decision tree classification, we mapped and assessed the accuracy to quantify forest (0.97), deforestation (0.85) and forest degradation (0.82) with an overall accuracy of 0.92. We show that 169,074 km² of Amazonian forest was converted to human-dominated land uses, such as agriculture, from 2000 to 2010. In that same time frame, an additional 50,815 km² of forest was directly altered by timber harvesting and/or fire, equivalent to 30% of the area converted by deforestation. While average annual outright deforestation declined by 46% between the first and second halves of the study period, annual forest degradation increased by 20%. Existing operational monitoring systems (PRODES: Monitoramento da Florestal Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite) report deforestation area to within 2% of our results, but do not account for the extensive forest degradation occurring throughout the region due to selective logging and forest fire. Annual monitoring of forest degradation across tropical forests is critical for developing land management policies as well as the monitoring of carbon stocks/emissions and protected areas.

Deforestation is the primary driver of carbon losses in tropical forests, but it does not operate alone. Forest fragmentation, a resulting feature of the deforestation process, promotes indirect carbon losses induced by edge effect. This process is not implicitly considered by policies for reducing carbon emissions in the tropics. Here, we used a remote sensing approach to estimate carbon losses driven by edge effect in Amazonia over the 2001 to 2015 period. We found that carbon losses associated with edge effect (947 Tg C) corresponded to one-third of losses from deforestation (2592 Tg C). Despite a notable negative trend of 7 Tg C year⁻¹ in carbon losses from deforestation, the carbon losses from edge effect remained unchanged, with an average of 63 ± 8 Tg C year⁻¹. Carbon losses caused by edge effect is thus an additional unquantified flux that can counteract carbon emissions avoided by reducing deforestation, compromising the Paris Agreement’s bold targets.

The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), a new spaceborne LiDAR system of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), has the potential to revolutionize global measurements of vertical vegetation structure. However, GEDI performance among different forest types and factors influencing GEDI performance needs to be evaluated against similar measurements from existing airborne LiDAR platforms. Ideally, comparisons across diverse forest types will inform future work quantifying biomass or mapping species habitats. Thus, we compared the second version of GEDI L2A product (GEDI V2) with Airborne Observation Platform (AOP) leaf-on LiDAR data across 33 National Ecological Observation Network (NEON) sites. Comparisons were made for ground elevation and relative height (RH) of GEDI with simulated airborne laser scanning (ALS) waveforms from discrete point cloud LiDAR. Results indicated that GEDI V2 obtained high accuracy on ground elevation and RH100 estimations (3σ) with RMSEs of 1.38 m and 2.62 m, respectively. GEDI produced forest height estimations (RH100) for all 12 forest types with a %RMSE below 25%. GEDI RHs were sensitive to ground finding accuracy, and GEDI performance of RH estimation varied from forest profiles of different forest types. For factors influencing GEDI performance, greater than 21% of GEDI RH95 and 33% of ground elevation variations can be explained by land surface attributes, observing sensor system characteristics, and the collection time differences between GEDI and NEON LiDAR. Furthermore, geolocation error remains an essential factor affecting GEDI performance, which varies among forest and land cover types, especially for canopy height estimation. The findings reported here can provide insights to guide and enhance future GEDI-based global forest structure mapping and applications.