Polyurethane foam (PUF) is actively used for thermal insulation. The main characteristic of thermal insulation is effective thermal conductivity. We studied the effective thermal conductivity of six samples of PUF with different types and sizes of cells. In the course of the research, heat was supplied to the foam using an induction heater in three different positions: above, below, or from the side of the foam. The studies were carried out in the temperature range from 30 to 100 °C. The research results showed that for all positions of the heater, the parameter that makes the greatest contribution to the change in thermal conductivity is the cell size. Two open-cell foam samples of different sizes (d = 3.1 mm and d = 0.725 mm) have thermal conductivity values of 0.0452 and 0.0287 W/m⸱K, respectively, at 50 °C. In the case of similar cell sizes for any position of the heater, the determining factor is the type of cells. Mixed-cell foam (d = 3.28 mm) at 50 °C has a thermal conductivity value of 0.0377 W/m⸱K, and open-cell foam (d = 3.1 mm) at the same temperature has a thermal conductivity value of 0.0452 W/m⸱K. The same foam sample shows different values of effective thermal conductivity when changing the position of the heater. When the heater is located from below the foam, for example, mixed-cell foam (d = 3.4 mm) has higher values of thermal conductivity (0.0446 W/m⸱K), than if the heater is located from above (0.0390 W/m⸱K). There are different values of the effective thermal conductivity in the upper and lower parts of the samples when the heater is located from the side of the foam. At 80 °C the difference is 40% for the open-cell foam (d = 3.1 mm).

This paper presents the results of theoretical and experimental studies to determine the optimal thickness of thermal insulation from basalt fiber and aerogel products for pipelines at temperatures of 300 and 600 °C. We carried out a comparison of the key thermophysical characteristics of the claimed heat-insulating materials. We performed a thermal imaging survey of the furnace chimney, insulated with basalt fiber and aerogel, while controlling the temperature of the flue gases by establishing the required ratio of the flow rate of natural gas and oxidizer. The temperature gradient along the thickness of the thermal insulation was obtained using a numerical tool developed in ANSYS. The results show that aerogel surpasses basalt fiber in all key thermophysical characteristics. At the same time, the only barrier to widespread industrial production and use of aerogel in the high-temperature thermal insulation segment is its market cost, which is still several times higher than that of basalt fiber in terms of an equivalent performance.

In the present work, based on numerical simulation, a comparative analysis of the flow of a chemically reacting gas flow through a catalyst is performed using the example of selective hydrogenation of acetylene in a wide range of flow temperatures variation. Catalyst models are based on open-cell foam material. A comparison is also made with calculations and experimental data for a granular catalyst. The porosity and cell diameter were chosen as variable parameters for the porous catalyst. The results of numerical studies were obtained in the form of component concentration fields of the gas mixture, vector fields of gas movement, values of conversion, and selectivity of the reaction under study. The parameters of the porous material of the catalyst are determined for the maximum efficiency of the process under study.

A comparison of the efficiency of the open cell foam (OCF) models is carried out. Geometrical models are constructed by the methods of simple cubic, body-centered cubic, and face-centered cubic. The parameter of the material efficiency is defined as the composition of the material surface area and the gas residence time in the porous media. The analytical evaluation shows different values of effective porosity for different construction models of the material. In this case, for all considered models, the effective porosity is in the range of 0.741-0.821.