Pedro Morais

Dr. Pedro Morais

2Ai – School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2014 in Medical Image Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sandro QueirósSandro Queirós
Sandro Queirós
DBDaniel Barbosa
Daniel Barbosa
BHBrecht Heyde
Brecht Heyde
Pedro MoraisPedro Morais
Pedro Morais
João L. VilaçaJoão L. Vilaça
João L. Vilaça
JDJan D'hooge
Jan D'hooge

1 April 2018 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HTHelena R. Torres
Helena R. Torres
Sandro QueirósSandro Queirós
Sandro Queirós
Pedro MoraisPedro Morais
Pedro Morais
BOBruno Oliveira
Bruno Oliveira
JFJaime Francisco Cruz Fonseca
Jaime Francisco Cruz Fonseca
João L. VilaçaJoão L. Vilaça
João L. Vilaça

1 December 2016 in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pedro MoraisPedro Morais
Pedro Morais
AMAlberto Marchi
Alberto Marchi
JBJulie A. Bogaert
Julie A. Bogaert
TDTom Dresselaers
Tom Dresselaers
BHBrecht Heyde
Brecht Heyde
BJBogaert Jan
Bogaert Jan
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) is a promising technique for quantification of myocardial strain from steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine images. We sought to determine the variability of CMR-FT using a non-rigid elastic registration algorithm recently available in a commercial software package (Segment, Medviso) in a real-life clinical setting. Firstly, we studied the variability in a healthy volunteer who underwent 10 CMR studies over five consecutive days. Secondly, 10 patients were selected from our CMR database yielding normal findings (normal group). Finally, we prospectively studied 10 patients with known or suspected myocardial pathology referred for further investigation to CMR (patient group). In the patient group a second study was performed respecting an interval of 30 min between studies. All studies were manually segmented at the end-diastolic phase by three observers. In all subjects left ventricular (LV) circumferential and radial strain were calculated in the short-axis direction (EccSAX and ErrSAX, respectively) and longitudinal strain in the long-axis direction (EllLAX). The level of CMR experience of the observers was 2 weeks, 6 months and >20 years. Mean contouring time was 7 ± 1 min, mean FT calculation time 13 ± 2 min. Intra- and inter-observer variability was good to excellent with an coefficient of reproducibility (CR) ranging 1.6% to 11.5%, and 1.7% to 16.0%, respectively and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging 0.89 to 1.00 and 0.74 to 0.99, respectively. Variability considerably increased in the test-retest setting with a CR ranging 4.2% to 29.1% and an ICC ranging 0.66 to 0.95 in the patient group. Variability was not influenced by level of expertise of the observers. Neither did the presence of myocardial pathology at CMR negatively impact variability. However, compared to global myocardial strain, segmental myocardial strain variability increased with a factor 2–3, in particular for the basal and apical short-axis slices. CMR-FT using non-rigid, elastic registration is a reproducible approach for strain analysis in patients routinely scheduled for CMR, and is not influenced by the level of training. However, further improvement is needed to reliably depict small variations in segmental myocardial strain.

11 September 2022 in Advanced Engineering Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FVFernando Veloso
Fernando Veloso
JGJoão Gomes-Fonseca
João Gomes-Fonseca
Pedro MoraisPedro Morais
Pedro Morais
JCJorge Correia-Pinto
Jorge Correia-Pinto
APAntónio C.M. Pinho
António C.M. Pinho
João L. VilaçaJoão L. Vilaça
João L. Vilaça

7 October 2018 in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMathias Peirlinck
Mathias Peirlinck
KSKevin L. Sack
Kevin L. Sack
PBPieter De Backer
Pieter De Backer
Pedro MoraisPedro Morais
Pedro Morais
PSPatrick Segers
Patrick Segers
MBMatthieu De Beule
Matthieu De Beule

13 December 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPedro Lobo
Pedro Lobo
Pedro MoraisPedro Morais
Pedro Morais
PMPatrick Murray
Patrick Murray
João L. VilaçaJoão L. Vilaça
João L. Vilaça
(1) Background: Continuous health promotion systems are increasingly important, enabling decentralized patient care, providing comfort, and reducing congestion in healthcare facilities. These systems allow for treatment beyond clinical settings and support preventive monitoring. Wearable systems have become essential tools for health monitoring, but they focus mainly on physiological data, overlooking motor data evaluation. The World Health Organization reports that 1.71 billion people globally suffer from musculoskeletal conditions, marked by pain and limited mobility. (2) Methods: To gain a deeper understanding of wearables for the motor rehabilitation, monitoring, and prediction of the progression and/or degradation of symptoms directly associated with upper-limb pathologies, this study was conducted. Thus, all articles indexed in the Web of Science database containing the terms “wearable”, “upper limb”, and (“rehabilitation” or “monitor” or “predict”) between 2019 and 2023 were flagged for analysis. (3) Results: Out of 391 papers identified, 148 were included and analyzed, exploring pathologies, technologies, and their interrelationships. Technologies were categorized by typology and primary purpose. (4) Conclusions: The study identified essential sensory units and actuators in wearable systems for upper-limb physiotherapy and analyzed them based on treatment methods and targeted pathologies.