Kyriakos Panopoulos

Dr. Kyriakos Panopoulos

Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKE.-I. Koytsoumpa
E.-I. Koytsoumpa
Konstantinos AtsoniosKonstantinos Atsonios
Konstantinos Atsonios
Kyriakos PanopoulosKyriakos Panopoulos
Kyriakos Panopoulos
SKS. Karellas
S. Karellas
Emmanuel KakarasEmmanuel Kakaras
Emmanuel Kakaras
 Juergen Karl, Juergen Karl,
Juergen Karl,

18 November 2020 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAntonella Zaccara
Antonella Zaccara
APAlice Petrucciani
Alice Petrucciani
Ismael MatinoIsmael Matino
Ismael Matino
TBTeresa Annunziata Branca
Teresa Annunziata Branca
Stefano DettoriStefano Dettori
Stefano Dettori
Kyriakos PanopoulosKyriakos Panopoulos
Kyriakos Panopoulos
Within integrated steelmaking industries significant research efforts are devoted to the efficient use of resources and the reduction of CO2 emissions. Integrated steelworks consume a considerable quantity of raw materials and produce a high amount of by-products, such as off-gases, currently used for the internal production of heat, steam or electricity. These off-gases can be further valorized as feedstock for methane and methanol syntheses, but their hydrogen content is often inadequate to reach high conversions in synthesis processes. The addition of hydrogen is fundamental and a suitable hydrogen production process must be selected to obtain advantages in process economy and sustainability. This paper presents a comparative analysis of different hydrogen production processes from renewable energy, namely polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis, solid oxide electrolyze cell electrolysis, and biomass gasification. Aspen Plus® V11-based models were developed, and simulations were conducted for sensitivity analyses to acquire useful information related to the process behavior. Advantages and disadvantages for each considered process were highlighted. In addition, the integration of the analyzed hydrogen production methods with methane and methanol syntheses is analyzed through further Aspen Plus®-based simulations. The pros and cons of the different hydrogen production options coupled with methane and methanol syntheses included in steelmaking industries are analyzed.

31 December 2009 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHP. Hofmann
P. Hofmann
Kyriakos PanopoulosKyriakos Panopoulos
Kyriakos Panopoulos
LFL.E. Fryda
L.E. Fryda
Emmanuel KakarasEmmanuel Kakaras
Emmanuel Kakaras

18 May 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michael BampaouMichael Bampaou
Michael Bampaou
Kyriakos PanopoulosKyriakos Panopoulos
Kyriakos Panopoulos
Panos SeferlisPanos Seferlis
Panos Seferlis
Spyros VoutetakisSpyros Voutetakis
Spyros Voutetakis
Ismael MatinoIsmael Matino
Ismael Matino
VIVincenzo Iannino
Vincenzo Iannino
The steel industry is among the highest carbon-emitting industrial sectors. Since the steel production process is already exhaustively optimized, alternative routes are sought in order to increase carbon efficiency and reduce these emissions. During steel production, three main carbon-containing off-gases are generated: blast furnace gas, coke oven gas and basic oxygen furnace gas. In the present work, the addition of renewable hydrogen by electrolysis to those steelworks off-gases is studied for the production of methane and methanol. Different case scenarios are investigated using AspenPlusTM flowsheet simulations, which differ on the end-product, the feedstock flowrates and on the production of power. Each case study is evaluated in terms of hydrogen and electrolysis requirements, carbon conversion, hydrogen consumption, and product yields. The findings of this study showed that the electrolysis requirements surpass the energy content of the steelwork’s feedstock. However, for the methanol synthesis cases, substantial improvements can be achieved if recycling a significant amount of the residual hydrogen.

30 September 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maciej ŻołądekMaciej Żołądek
Maciej Żołądek
Alexandros KafetzisAlexandros Kafetzis
Alexandros Kafetzis
Rafal FigajRafal Figaj
Rafal Figaj
Kyriakos PanopoulosKyriakos Panopoulos
Kyriakos Panopoulos
Island energy systems are becoming an important part of energy transformation due to the growing needs for the penetration of renewable energy. Among the possible systems, a combination of different energy generation technologies is a viable option for local users, as long as energy storage is implemented. The presented paper describes an energy-economic assessment of an island system with a photovoltaic field, small wind turbine, wood chip gasifier, battery, and hydrogen circuit with electrolyzer and fuel cell. The system is designed to satisfy the electrical energy demand of a tourist facility in two European localizations. The operation of the system is developed and dynamically simulated in the Transient System Simulation (TRNSYS) environment, taking into account realistic user demand. The results show that in Gdansk, Poland, it is possible to satisfy 99% of user demand with renewable energy sources with excess energy equal to 31%, while in Agkistro, Greece, a similar result is possible with 43% of excess energy. Despite the high initial costs, it is possible to obtain Simple Pay Back periods of 12.5 and 22.5 years for Gdansk and Agkistro, respectively. This result points out that under a high share of renewables in the energy demand of the user, the profitability of the system is highly affected by the local cost of energy vectors. The achieved results show that the system is robust in providing energy to the users and that future development may lead to an operation based fully on renewables.

30 August 2024 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VPVera Proskynitopoulou Proskynitopoulou
Vera Proskynitopoulou Proskynitopoulou
AVAnastasios Vourros
Anastasios Vourros
PTPanagiotis Dimopoulos Toursidis
Panagiotis Dimopoulos Toursidis
IGIoannis Garagounis
Ioannis Garagounis
SLSouzana Lorentzou
Souzana Lorentzou
Kyriakos PanopoulosKyriakos Panopoulos
Kyriakos Panopoulos