Efficient management of soil nutrients is essential for optimizing crop production, ensuring sustainable agricultural practices, and addressing the challenges posed by population growth and environmental degradation. Smart agriculture, using advanced technologies, plays an important role in achieving these goals by enabling real-time monitoring and precision management of nutrients. In open-field soil cultivation, spatial variability in soil properties demands site-specific nutrient management and integration with variable-rate technology (VRT) to optimize fertilizer application, reduce nutrient losses, and enhance crop yields. Hydroponic solution cultivation, on the other hand, requires precise monitoring and control of nutrient solutions to maintain optimal conditions for plant growth, ensuring efficient use of water and fertilizers. This review aims to explore recent trends in soil and solution nutrient sensing technologies for open-field soil and facilitated hydroponic cultivation, highlighting advancements that promote efficiency and sustainability. Key technologies include electrochemical and optical sensors, Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled monitoring, and the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) for predictive modeling. Blockchain technology is also emerging as a tool to enhance transparency and traceability in nutrient management, promoting compliance with environmental standards and sustainable practices. In open-field soil cultivation, real-time sensing technologies support targeted nutrient application by accounting for spatial variability, minimizing environmental risks such as runoff and eutrophication. In hydroponic solution cultivation, precise solution sensing ensures nutrient balance, optimizing plant health and productivity. By advancing these technologies, smart agriculture can achieve sustainable crop production, improved resource efficiency, and environmental protection, fostering a resilient food system.

LiDAR sensors have great potential for enabling crop recognition (e.g., plant height, canopy area, plant spacing, and intra-row spacing measurements) and the recognition of agricultural working environments (e.g., field boundaries, ridges, and obstacles) using agricultural field machinery. The objective of this study was to review the use of LiDAR sensors in the agricultural field for the recognition of crops and agricultural working environments. This study also highlights LiDAR sensor testing procedures, focusing on critical parameters, industry standards, and accuracy benchmarks; it evaluates the specifications of various commercially available LiDAR sensors with applications for plant feature characterization and highlights the importance of mounting LiDAR technology on agricultural machinery for effective recognition of crops and working environments. Different studies have shown promising results of crop feature characterization using an airborne LiDAR, such as coefficient of determination (R²) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) values of 0.97 and 0.05 m for wheat, 0.88 and 5.2 cm for sugar beet, and 0.50 and 12 cm for potato plant height estimation, respectively. A relative error of 11.83% was observed between sensor and manual measurements, with the highest distribution correlation at 0.675 and an average relative error of 5.14% during soybean canopy estimation using LiDAR. An object detection accuracy of 100% was found for plant identification using three LiDAR scanning methods: center of the cluster, lowest point, and stem–ground intersection. LiDAR was also shown to effectively detect ridges, field boundaries, and obstacles, which is necessary for precision agriculture and autonomous agricultural machinery navigation. Future directions for LiDAR applications in agriculture emphasize the need for continuous advancements in sensor technology, along with the integration of complementary systems and algorithms, such as machine learning, to improve performance and accuracy in agricultural field applications. A strategic framework for implementing LiDAR technology in agriculture includes recommendations for precise testing, solutions for current limitations, and guidance on integrating LiDAR with other technologies to enhance digital agriculture.

Journal of Animal Science and Technology (JAST) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, review articles and notes in all fields of animal science. Topics covered by the journal include: genetics and breeding, physiology, nutrition of monogastric animals, nutrition of ruminants, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, grasslands and roughages, livestock environment, animal biotechnology, animal behavior and welfare.

LoRa-based sensor nodes may provide a reliable solution for wireless communication in orchard cultivation and smart farming, facilitating real-time environmental monitoring. However, the signal strength and data integrity can be affected by several factors, such as trees, terrain, weather, and nearby electrical devices. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of orchard trees on the performance of a LoRa sensor node under orchard conditions. A sensor node, built with a commercial LoRa transceiver and microcontroller unit (MCU), was paired with a single-channel gateway linked to an orchard irrigation system. Performance metrics such as the packet delivery ratio (PDR), received signal strength indicator (RSSI), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured over a range of 20 to 120 m under open field conditions and in an orchard with trees averaging 3.12 and 4.36 m in height. Data were sent every 20 s using three spreading factors (SF8, SF10, and SF12) and stored as a CSV file in the MCU via a Python program. The results showed that the PDR remained consistently high (100%) under non-vegetative (open field) conditions. In the orchard under vegetative conditions, the PDR dropped significantly, with SF12 maintaining 100% only up to 120 m. For SF10, the packet delivery rates dropped to 45% at 80 m, while SF8 achieved 100% at 20 m but decreased to 52% at 40 m. SNR values also declined with an increase in distance, becoming largely undetectable beyond 40 m for SF8. These findings indicate that vegetation greatly impacts LoRa sensor node performance, reducing packet delivery and signal quality in orchards.

The geometric feature characterization of fruit trees plays a role in effective management in orchards. LiDAR (light detection and ranging) technology for object detection enables the rapid and precise evaluation of geometric features. This study aimed to quantify the height, canopy volume, tree spacing, and row spacing in an apple orchard using a three-dimensional (3D) LiDAR sensor. A LiDAR sensor was used to collect 3D point cloud data from the apple orchard. Six samples of apple trees, representing a variety of shapes and sizes, were selected for data collection and validation. Commercial software and the python programming language were utilized to process the collected data. The data processing steps involved data conversion, radius outlier removal, voxel grid downsampling, denoising through filtering and erroneous points, segmentation of the region of interest (ROI), clustering using the density-based spatial clustering (DBSCAN) algorithm, data transformation, and the removal of ground points. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the estimated outputs from the point cloud with the corresponding measured values. The sensor-estimated and measured tree heights were 3.05 ± 0.34 m and 3.13 ± 0.33 m, respectively, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.08 m, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.09 m, a linear coefficient of determination (r²) of 0.98, a confidence interval (CI) of −0.14 to −0.02 m, and a high concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.96, indicating strong agreement and high accuracy. The sensor-estimated and measured canopy volumes were 13.76 ± 2.46 m³ and 14.09 ± 2.10 m³, respectively, with an MAE of 0.57 m³, an RMSE of 0.61 m³, an r² value of 0.97, and a CI of −0.92 to 0.26, demonstrating high precision. For tree and row spacing, the sensor-estimated distances and measured distances were 3.04 ± 0.17 and 3.18 ± 0.24 m, and 3.35 ± 0.08 and 3.40 ± 0.05 m, respectively, with RMSE and r² values of 0.12 m and 0.92 for tree spacing, and 0.07 m and 0.94 for row spacing, respectively. The MAE and CI values were 0.09 m, 0.05 m, and −0.18 for tree spacing and 0.01, −0.1, and 0.002 for row spacing, respectively. Although minor differences were observed, the sensor estimates were efficient, though specific measurements require further refinement. The results are based on a limited dataset of six measured values, providing initial insights into geometric feature characterization performance. However, a larger dataset would offer a more reliable accuracy assessment. The small sample size (six apple trees) limits the generalizability of the findings and necessitates caution in interpreting the results. Future studies should incorporate a broader and more diverse dataset to validate and refine the characterization, enhancing management practices in apple orchards.

Jute is the golden fiber of Bangladesh, but its production is declining due to the involvement of higher production and processing costs, where a major portion of the cost is needed for fiber extraction. Labor unavailability and increasing labor cost have led to higher jute fiber production cost. To address these issues, this study looks at the development of a power-operated and cost-effective fiber extraction machine aiming at reducing the production cost. The study was conducted at the Rangpur regional office premises of Practical Action in Bangladesh, and the developed machine was branded as “Aashkol”, which had the following major parts: a feeding tray, a primary extraction roller, a secondary extraction roller, grabbing rollers, fiber collection stand, base frame, protection cover, and a spring-loaded tray under the primary extraction roller. The Aashkol can extract green ribbon from the jute stem, but jute sticks were broken down into smaller pieces (3–6 cm). The performance evaluation of the machine was conducted using different types of jute (Deshi, Kenaf, and Tossa) and compared with another jute extraction machine (KP model, introduced by Karupannya Rangpur Ltd.). The Aashkol-based extraction and improved retting systems were also evaluated and compared with traditional jute extraction systems. The jute stem input capacity (4.99 t h⁻¹) of the Aashkol was 47.6% higher than the KP model (3.38 t h⁻¹). Compared with the traditional system, across jute types, the Aashkol produced a 9% higher fiber yield and saved 46% retting time. Overall, the Aashkol reduced 90% of the labor requirement and saved 11.6 USD t⁻¹ in jute fiber extraction and retting than the traditional method.