Background: The prognostic value of commonly recurrent mutations remains unclear in mucosal melanomas. Methods: Clinicopathologic parameters of 214 cases of mucosal melanomas diagnosed in 1989–2020 in several clinical institutions were analyzed. NRAS, KIT, BRAF, IGF2R and SF3B1 mutational analyses by Sanger sequencing and next generation sequencing-based assay were performed in a subset of cases. Results: Of the triple (BRAF, NRAS, NF1)-negative cases, APC, KIT and KRAS are detected mainly in sinonasal, vulvovaginal and anorectal melanomas, respectively. NRAS, KIT, BRAF, IGF2R and SF3B1 mutations are detected in 19% (37/198), 22% (44/197), 12% (25/201), 16% (22/138) and 15% (20/133) of cases, respectively. In univariate analyses, advanced stage (p = 0.016), 65 years or older (p = 0.048) and presence of ulceration (p = 0.027) are significantly correlated with worse overall survival (OS), respectively. NRAS mutation significantly correlates with worse OS (p = 0.028) and worse melanoma-specific survival (MSS) (p = 0.03) for all cases of mucosal melanomas. In multivariate analyses, NRAS mutation remains as an independent predictor of worse OS (p = 0.036) and worse MSS (p = 0.024). Conclusion: NRAS mutation is a predictor of worse survival, independent of stage in mucosal melanomas. The significance of frequently mutated IGF2R in mucosal melanomas remains unclear.

Introduction: Mucosal melanoma is rare and associated with poorer prognosis in comparison to conventional melanoma subtypes. Little is known about the prognostic significance as well as possible associations between PARP1 and immunologic response in mucosal melanoma. Methods: PARP1, PD-L1 and IDO1 immunostains were performed on 192 mucosal melanomas including 86 vulvar, 89 sinonasal, and 17 anorectal melanomas. Results: By Kaplan–Meier analyses, high PARP1 expression correlated with worse overall and melanoma-specific survival (log-rank p values = 0.026 and 0.047, respectively). Tumors with combined PARP1 and IDO1 high expression correlated with worse overall and melanoma-specific survival (p = 0.015, 0.0034 respectively). By multivariate analyses, high PARP1 expression remained a predictor of worse survival independent of stage. By Fisher’s exact test, high PARP1 expression correlated with highly mitogenic tumors (p = 0.02). High tumoral PD-L1 and IDO1 expression were associated with ulcerated primary tumors (p = 0.019, 0.0019, respectively). By linear regression analyses, correlations between PARP1 expression versus IDO1 expression (p = 0.0001) and mitotic index (p = 0.0052) were observed. Conclusion: Increased expression of PARP1 is an independent negative prognostic marker in mucosal melanomas. The association between PARP1 and IDO1 and their combined adverse prognostic role raise the potential of combined therapy in mucosal melanoma.

Background: Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is the most common cause of mortality and neurological disability in infancy after perinatal asphyxia. Reliable biomarkers to predict neurological outcomes of neonates after perinatal asphyxia are still not accessible in clinical practice. Methods: A prospective cohort study enrolled neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Biochemical blood tests and cerebral Doppler ultrasound were measured within 6 h of age and at the 4th day old. Neurological outcomes were assessed at 1 year old. Results: Sixty-four neonates with perinatal asphyxia were enrolled. Fifty-eight (90%) had hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) including 20 (34%) Stage I, 21 (36%) Stage II, and 17 (29%) Stage III. In the asphyxiated infants without therapeutic hypothermia, HIE stage, PH, and base excess levels within 6 h of age were the predictors of adverse outcomes. In the asphyxiated infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia, HIE stage failed to predict outcomes. Instead, blood lactate levels and pulsatility index (PI) of medial cerebral arteries (MCA) either in 6 h of age or at the 4th day old independently predicted adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Blood lactate, which is a common accessible test at the hospital and MCA PI on cerebral ultrasound could predict adverse outcomes in asphyxiated infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia.

The association of immune markers and clinicopathologic features and patient outcome has not been extensively studied in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). We correlated tumoral PD-L1 and IDO1 expression, and intratumoral CD8+ and FoxP3+ lymphocytes count with clinicopathologic variables, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status, and patient outcomes in a series of 132 MCC. By univariate analyses, tumoral PD-L1 expression >1% and combined tumoral PD-L1 >1% and high intratumoral FoxP3+ lymphocyte count correlated with improved overall survival (OS) (p = 0.016, 0.0072), MCC-specific survival (MSS) (p = 0.019, 0.017), and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.043, 0.004, respectively). High intratumoral CD8+ and FoxP3+ lymphocyte count correlated with longer MSS (p = 0.036) and improved PFS (p = 0.047), respectively. Ulceration correlated with worse OS and worse MSS. Age, male gender, and higher stage (3 and 4) significantly correlated with worse survival. MCPyV positivity correlated with immune response. By multivariate analyses, only ulceration and age remained as independent predictors of worse OS; gender and stage remained for shorter PFS. Tumoral PD-L1 expression and increased density of intratumoral CD8+ lymphocytes and FoxP+ lymphocytes may represent favorable prognosticators in a subset of MCCs. Tumoral PD-L1 expression correlated with intratumoral CD8+ and FoxP3+ lymphocytes, which is supportive of an adaptive immune response.

Meng-Ying Lin, Cheng-Lin Wu, Yung-Yeh Su, Chien-Jui Huang, Wei-Lun Chang, and Bor-Shyang Sheu. Gut and Liver 2023;17:318-27. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl220030

Background: Merkel cell carcinomas of unknown primary (MCC-UPs) are defined as deep-seated tumors without an associated cutaneous tumor. Although the distinction has important clinical implications, it remains unclear whether these tumors represent primary tumors of lymph nodes or metastatic cutaneous primaries. Methods: We compared the immunohistochemical profiles of four groups of MCCs (Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-positive UP, MCPyV-negative UP, MCPyV-positive known primary (KP), and MCPyV-negative KP) using B-cell and pre-B-cell markers, cell cycle regulating proteins, follicular stem cell markers, and immune markers, and performed next generation and Sanger sequencing. Results: Virus-positive and virus-negative MCC-UPs exhibited an immunoprofile similar to virus-positive and virus-negative primary cutaneous MCCs, respectively. MCC-UP tumors (both virus-positive and -negative) were immunogenic with similar or even higher tumoral PD-L1 expression and intratumoral CD8 and FoxP3 infiltrates in comparison to MCPyV-positive cutaneous tumors. In addition, similar to primary cutaneous MCCs, MCPyV-negative MCC-UPs exhibited UV signatures and frequent high tumor mutational burdens, whereas few molecular alterations were noted in MCPyV-positive MCC-UPs. Conclusions: Our results showed distinct UV-signatures in MCPyV-negative tumors and high immunogenicity in MCPyV-positive tumors. Although additional studies are warranted for the MCPyV-positive cases, our findings are supportive of a cutaneous metastatic origin for MCPyV-negative MCC-UP tumors.