Evi Verbecque

Dr. Evi Verbecque

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2018 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HNHerssens Nolan
Herssens Nolan
EVEvi Verbecque
Evi Verbecque
AHAnn Hallemans
Ann Hallemans
LVLuc Vereeck
Luc Vereeck
VRVincent Van Rompaey
Vincent Van Rompaey
WSWim Saeys
Wim Saeys

1 September 2016 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVEvi Verbecque
Evi Verbecque
LVLuc Vereeck
Luc Vereeck
AHAnn Hallemans
Ann Hallemans

13 February 2017 in International Journal of Audiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVEvi Verbecque
Evi Verbecque
TMTessa Marijnissen
Tessa Marijnissen
NBNiels De Belder
Niels De Belder
VRVincent Van Rompaey
Vincent Van Rompaey
ABAn Boudewyns
An Boudewyns
AHAnn Hallemans
Ann Hallemans
The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in children with SNHL classified according to the applied test and its corresponding sensitivity and specificity. Data were gathered using a systematic search query including reference screening. Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase were searched. Strategy and reporting of this review was based on the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Methodological quality was assessed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. All studies, regardless the applied vestibular test, showed that vestibular function differs significantly between children with hearing loss and normal hearing (p < 0.05). Compared with caloric testing, the sensitivity of the Rotational Chair Test (RCT) varies between 61 and 80% and specificity between 21 and 80%, whereas this was, respectively, 71-100% and 30-100% for collic Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (cVEMP). Compared with RCT, the sensitivity was 88-100% and the specificity was 69-100% for the Dynamic Visual Acuity test, respectively, 67-100% and 71-100% for the (video) Head Impulse Test and 83% and 86% for the ocular VEMP. Currently, due to methodological shortcoming, evidence on sensitivity and specificity of vestibular tests is unknown to moderate. Future research should focus on adequate sample sizes (subgroups >30).

1 January 2021 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVEvi Verbecque
Evi Verbecque
CJCharlotte Johnson
Charlotte Johnson
EREugene Rameckers
Eugene Rameckers
ATAngelina Thijs
Angelina Thijs
IVIngrid van der Veer
Ingrid van der Veer
KKKatrijn Klingels
Katrijn Klingels

11 December 2014 in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EVEvi Verbecque
Evi Verbecque
PCPaula Hentschel Lobo Da Costa
Paula Hentschel Lobo Da Costa
LVLuc Vereeck
Luc Vereeck
AHAnn Hallemans
Ann Hallemans

1 June 2018 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAnn Hallemans
Ann Hallemans
EVEvi Verbecque
Evi Verbecque
Raphael DumasRaphael Dumas
Raphael Dumas
LCLaurence Chèze
Laurence Chèze
AHAngèle Van Hamme
Angèle Van Hamme
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert