Thomas Robert

Dr. Thomas Robert

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2012
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
ZAZohaib Aftab
Zohaib Aftab
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert
PWPierre-Brice Wieber
Pierre-Brice Wieber
While humans are highly efficient in dealing with balance perturbations, current biped humanoid robots are far from showing similar skills. This is mainly due to the limited capacity of current robot controllers to deal with the inherently complex dynamics of biped robots. Though Model Predictive Control schemes have shown improved robustness to perturbations, they still suffer from a few shortcomings such as not considering the upper body inertial effects or non-optimal step durations. We propose here a Model Predictive Control scheme that specifically addresses these shortcomings and generates human-like responses to perturbations, involving appropriate combinations of ankle, hip and stepping strategies, with automatically adjusted step durations. The emphasis of this paper is on modeling and analyzing the effects of different cost functions and coefficients on the behavior of the controller while leaving real-time implementations and experiments for later work.

4 July 2009 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert
BBBradford C. Bennett
Bradford C. Bennett
SRShawn D. Russell
Shawn D. Russell
CZChristopher A. Zirker
Christopher A. Zirker
MAMark F. Abel
Mark F. Abel

1 July 2016 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RTROMAIN TISSERAND
ROMAIN TISSERAND
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert
Raphael DumasRaphael Dumas
Raphael Dumas
LCLaurence Chèze
Laurence Chèze

25 July 2022 in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BLBhrigu K. Lahkar
Bhrigu K. Lahkar
AMAntoine Muller
Antoine Muller
RDRaphaël Dumas
Raphaël Dumas
LRLionel Reveret
Lionel Reveret
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert
Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity can be useful to assess the performance and skill levels of athletes during combat sports such as boxing. Although marker-based approach is widely used to obtain kinematic data, it is not suitable for “in the field” activities, i.e., when performed outside the laboratory environment. Markerless video-based systems along with deep learning-based pose estimation algorithms show great potential for estimating skeletal kinematics. However, applicability of these systems in assessing upper-limb kinematics remains unexplored in highly dynamic activities. This study aimed to assess kinematics of the upper limb estimated with a markerless motion capture system (2D video cameras along with commercially available pose estimation software Theia3D) compared to those measured with marker-based system during “in the field” boxing. A total of three elite boxers equipped with retroreflective markers were instructed to perform specific sequences of shadow boxing trials. Their movements were simultaneously recorded with 12 optoelectronic and 10 video cameras, providing synchronized data to be processed further for comparison. Comparative assessment showed higher differences in 3D joint center positions at the elbow (more than 3 cm) compared to the shoulder and wrist (<2.5 cm). In the case of joint angles, relatively weaker agreement was observed along internal/external rotation. The shoulder joint revealed better performance across all the joints. Segment velocities displayed good-to-excellent agreement across all the segments. Overall, segment velocities exhibited better performance compared to joint angles. The findings indicate that, given the practicality of markerless motion capture system, it can be a promising alternative to analyze sports-performance.

16 February 2008 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert
VZVladimir M. Zatsiorsky
Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky
MLMark L. Latash
Mark L. Latash

29 November 2016 in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RTROMAIN TISSERAND
ROMAIN TISSERAND
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert
PCPascal Chabaud
Pascal Chabaud
MBMarc Bonnefoy
Marc Bonnefoy
LCLaurence Chèze
Laurence Chèze
In the case of disequilibrium, the capacity to step quickly is critical to avoid falling for elderly. This capacity can be simply assessed through the choice stepping reaction time test (CSRT), where elderly fallers (F) take longer to step than elderly non-fallers (NF). However, reasons why elderly F elongate their stepping time remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess the characteristics of anticipated postural adjustments (APA) that elderly F develop in a stepping context and their consequences on the dynamic stability. 44 community-dwelling elderly subjects (20 F and 22 NF) performed a CSRT where kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected. Variables were analyzed using two-way repeated measures ANOVAs. Results for F compared to NF showed that stepping time is elongated, due to a longer APA phase. During APA, they seem to use two distinct balance strategies, depending on the axis: in the anteroposterior direction, we measured a smaller backward movement and slower peak velocity of the center of pressure (CoP); in the mediolateral direction, the CoP movement was similar in amplitude and peak velocity between groups but lasted longer. The biomechanical consequence of both strategies was an increased margin of stability (MoS) at foot-off, in the respective direction. By elongating their APA, elderly F use a safer balance strategy that prioritizes dynamic stability conditions instead of the objective of the task. Such a choice in balance strategy probably comes from muscular limitations and/or a higher fear of falling and paradoxically indicates an increased risk of fall.