António Ferraz

Dr. António Ferraz

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2012 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAntónio Ferraz
António Ferraz
FBFrédéric Bretar
Frédéric Bretar
SJStéphane Jacquemoud
Stéphane Jacquemoud
Gil GonçalvesGil Gonçalves
Gil Gonçalves
LPLuísa Maria Pereira
Luísa Maria Pereira
Paula SoaresPaula Soares
Paula Soares

1 September 2016 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAntónio Ferraz
António Ferraz
SSSassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi
CMClément Mallet
Clément Mallet
Victoria MeyerVictoria Meyer
Victoria Meyer

16 June 2016 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YWYunsheng Wang
Yunsheng Wang
Juha HyyppäJuha Hyyppä
Juha Hyyppä
XLXinlian Liang
Xinlian Liang
HKHarri Kaartinen
Harri Kaartinen
XYXiaowei Yu
Xiaowei Yu
Petteri AlhoPetteri Alho
Petteri Alho
Canopy structure plays an essential role in biophysical activities in forest environments. However, quantitative descriptions of a 3-D canopy structure are extremely difficult because of the complexity and heterogeneity of forest systems. Airborne laser scanning (ALS) provides an opportunity to automatically measure a 3-D canopy structure in large areas. Compared with other point cloud technologies such as the image-based Structure from Motion, the power of ALS lies in its ability to penetrate canopies and depict subordinate trees. However, such capabilities have been poorly explored so far. In this paper, the potential of ALS-based approaches in depicting a 3-D canopy structure is explored in detail through an international benchmarking of five recently developed ALS-based individual tree detection (ITD) methods. For the first time, the results of the ITD methods are evaluated for each of four crown classes, i.e., dominant, codominant, intermediate, and suppressed trees, which provides insight toward understanding the current status of depicting a 3-D canopy structure using ITD methods, particularly with respect to their performances, potential, and challenges. This benchmarking study revealed that the canopy structure plays a considerable role in the detection accuracy of ITD methods, and its influence is even greater than that of the tree species as well as the species composition in a stand. The study also reveals the importance of utilizing the point cloud data for the detection of intermediate and suppressed trees. Different from what has been reported in previous studies, point density was found to be a highly influential factor in the performance of the methods that use point cloud data. Greater efforts should be invested in the point-based or hybrid ITD approaches to model the 3-D canopy structure and to further explore the potential of high-density and multiwavelengths ALS data.

26 October 2020 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFabian D. Schneider
Fabian D. Schneider
AFAntónio Ferraz
António Ferraz
SHSteven Hancock
Steven Hancock
LDLaura I Duncanson
Laura I Duncanson
RDRalph Dubayah
Ralph Dubayah
DSDavid S Schimel
David S Schimel
Plant biodiversity supports life on Earth and provides a range of important ecosystem services, but is under severe pressure by global change. Structural diversity plays a crucial role for carbon, water and energy cycles and animal habitats. However, it is very difficult to map and monitor over large areas, limiting our ability to assess the status of biodiversity and predict change. NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) provides a new opportunity to measure 3D plant canopy structure of the world’s temperate, Mediterranean and tropical ecosystems, but its potential to map structural diversity is not yet tested. Here, we use wall-to-wall airborne laser scanning (ALS) to simulate GEDI data (GEDI sim ) over 7380 km2 in the southern Sierra Nevada mountains in California and evaluate how well GEDI’s sampling scheme captures patterns of structural diversity. We evaluate functional richness and functional beta diversity in a biodiversity hot spot. GEDI sim performed well for trait retrievals (r2 = 0.68) and functional richness mapping (r2 = 0.75) compared to ALS retrievals, despite lower correlations in complex terrain with steep slopes. Functional richness patterns were strongly associated with soil organic carbon stocks and density as well as variables related to water availability and could be appropriately mapped by GEDI sim with and without cloud cover. Functional beta diversity was more strongly related to local changes in topography and more challenging to map, especially with decreasing sampling density. The reduced number of GEDI sim shots when simulating cloud cover lead to a strong overestimation of beta diversity and a reduction of r2 from 0.64 to 0.40 compared to ALS. The ability to map functional richness has been demonstrated with potential application at continental scales that could be transformative for our understanding of large-scale patterns of plant canopy structure, diversity and potential links to animal diversity, movement and habitats.

7 May 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMélaine Aubry-Kientz
Mélaine Aubry-Kientz
RDRaphaël Dutrieux
Raphaël Dutrieux
AFAntónio Ferraz
António Ferraz
Sassan SaatchiSassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi
HHHamid Hamraz
Hamid Hamraz
Gregoire VincentGregoire Vincent
Gregoire Vincent
Tropical forest canopies are comprised of tree crowns of multiple species varying in shape and height, and ground inventories do not usually reliably describe their structure. Airborne laser scanning data can be used to characterize these individual crowns, but analytical tools developed for boreal or temperate forests may require to be adjusted before they can be applied to tropical environments. Therefore, we compared results from six different segmentation methods applied to six plots (39 ha) from a study site in French Guiana. We measured the overlap of automatically segmented crowns projection with selected crowns manually delineated on high-resolution photography. We also evaluated the goodness of fit following automatic matching with field inventory data using a model linking tree diameter to tree crown width. The different methods tested in this benchmark segmented highly different numbers of crowns having different characteristics. Segmentation methods based on the point cloud (AMS3D and Graph-Cut) globally outperformed methods based on the Canopy Height Models, especially for small crowns; the AMS3D method outperformed the other methods tested for the overlap analysis, and AMS3D and Graph-Cut performed the best for the automatic matching validation. Nevertheless, other methods based on the Canopy Height Model performed better for very large emergent crowns. The dense foliage of tropical moist forests prevents sufficient point densities in the understory to segment subcanopy trees accurately, regardless of the segmentation method.

5 April 2018 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Carlos Alberto SilvaCarlos Alberto Silva
Carlos Alberto Silva
SSSassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi
MGMariano Garcia
Mariano Garcia
NLNicolas Labrière
Nicolas Labrière
CKCarine Klauberg
Carine Klauberg
AHAndrew T. Hudak
Andrew T. Hudak
NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamic Investigation (GEDI) mission has been designed to measure forest structure using lidar waveforms to sample the earth's vegetation while in orbit aboard the International Space Station. In this paper, we used airborne large-footprint (LF) lidar measurements to simulate GEDI observations from which we retrieved ground elevation, vegetation height, and aboveground biomass (AGB). GEDI-like product accuracy was then assessed by comparing them to similar products derived from airborne small-footprint (SF) lidar measurements. The study focused on tropical forests and used data collected during the NASA and European Space Agency (ESA) AfriSAR ground and airborne campaigns in the Lope National Park in Central Gabon. The measurements covered a gradient of successional stages of forest development with different height, canopy density, and topography. The comparison of the two sensors shows that LF lidar waveforms and simulated waveforms from SF lidar are equivalent in their ability to estimate ground elevation (RMSE = 0.5 m, bias = 0.29 m) and maximum forest height (RMSE = 2.99 m, bias = 0.24 m) over the study area. The difference in the AGB estimated from both lidar instruments at the 1-ha spatial scale is small over the entire study area (RMSE = 6.34 Mg·ha −1 , bias = 11.27 Mg·ha −1 ) and the bias is attributed to the impact of ground slopes greater than 10–20° on the LF lidar measurements of forest height. Our results support the ability of GEDILF lidar to measure the complex structure of humid tropical forests and provide AGB estimates comparable to SF-derived ones.