Tomer Goldberger

Dr. Tomer Goldberger


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 December 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis
MLMichal Lokshin
Michal Lokshin
DLDan Littner
Dan Littner
TGTomer Goldberger
Tomer Goldberger
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
(1) The objective of the study is to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of in vitro studies in order to assess the depth to which E. faecalis bacteria penetrate human dentinal tubules after the use of various irrigation solutions. (2) Methods: A literature search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases was conducted, as well as a backward and forward citation search. Two independent reviewers then selected suitable studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and the risk of bias and methodology of the studies were evaluated. (3) Results: Out of a total of 504 papers evaluated following the removal of duplicates, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The heterogeneity of the studies made it impossible to perform a meta-analysis. The majority of the studies reported that sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) can affect the penetration depth of E. faecalis suspensions. The studies included in this review possess a moderate to high risk of bias and thus represent moderate evidence that the antimicrobial activity of NaOCl and CHX affects the intra-tubular penetration of bacteria. (4) Conclusions: The evidence indicates that irrigants may affect the bacteria inside human dentinal tubules. Standardized high-quality methods are needed to evaluate bacterial penetration in in vitro studies.

20 September 2021 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRuth Schvartzman Cohen
Ruth Schvartzman Cohen
TGTomer Goldberger
Tomer Goldberger
IMIna Merzlak
Ina Merzlak
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis
Gabi ChaushuGabi Chaushu
Gabi Chaushu
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
Background and Objectives: Large radicular cysts of the maxilla present a clinical challenge, as they may cause recurrent infection, severe alveolar bone loss and disruption of the nasal and maxillary sinus floors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of previous root canal treatment on the clinical presentation of large maxillary radicular cysts. Materials and Methods: All cases of radicular cysts treated at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of a tertiary public hospital over a period of six years (2012–2018) were evaluated. Histologically confirmed radicular cysts of the maxilla with a maximal dimension of over 15 mm were included. Demographic data of the patients, clinical presentation and radiographic features of the lesions were analyzed. Results: A total of 211 inflammatory cysts were treated in the study period, of these 54 histologically diagnosed radicular cysts in the maxilla were found to have a maximal dimension of over 15 mm. The mean age of patients with large maxillary radicular cysts was 43.3 years, 57.6% of which were male and 42.4% female. The lateral incisor was the most common tooth affected (46.3%). The mean size of the large radicular cysts was 25 mm. Then, 83.8% of the cysts were observed in teeth with previous endodontic treatment. Teeth without endodontic treatment presented clinically with significantly fewer acute symptoms in comparison to teeth with previous endodontic treatment. Conclusions: the vast majority (83.8%) of large maxillary radicular cysts were associated with endodontically treated teeth. Previous endodontic treatment was correlated to increased frequency of clinical symptoms.

18 November 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TGTomer Goldberger
Tomer Goldberger
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
NBNuphar Blau-Venezia
Nuphar Blau-Venezia
ATAviad Tamse
Aviad Tamse
DLDan Littner
Dan Littner
Introduction: Vertical root fracture (VRF) is a root-canal treatment complication and is a major reason for extraction of the root-canal-treated teeth. The diagnosis of VRF can be complicated because of absence of specific signs, symptoms, and radiographic features. A combination that includes the presence of deep pocket and a sinus tract in root-canal-treated tooth was proposed as a pathognomonic for VRF. The purpose of this study was to systematically search and evaluate the literature regarding the correlation between the clinical signs considered pathognomonic for the diagnosis of VRF, with the actual reference standard by means of systematic review of the literature. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies evaluating the clinical signs considered pathognomonic for the diagnosis of VRF. The following databases were searched: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Central. The identified studies were subjected to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Initially, 1141 possible relevant articles were identified. After title and abstract screening, 40 articles were subjected to a full-text evaluation, 3 articles met the inclusion criteria and contained data regarding the prevalence of the pathognomonic combination in VRF’s-confirmed teeth. The presence of deep pocket and a sinus tract in endodontically treated teeth was found in 28% of the cases. Conclusion: To date, the current scientific knowledge regarding the correlation between the clinical symptoms considered pathognomonic for VRF diagnosis in the root-canal-treated tooth and the actual reference standard is quite low.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HHHadas Heller
Hadas Heller
IBIlan Beitlitum
Ilan Beitlitum
TGTomer Goldberger
Tomer Goldberger
AEAlona Emodi-Perlman
Alona Emodi-Perlman
SLShifra Levartovsky
Shifra Levartovsky
This retrospective study assessed outcomes and complications related to implants and prostheses in edentulous patients treated with soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses (SCCSIPs). After the final prosthesis was delivered, patients participated in an annual dental check-up program, including clinical and radiographic assessments. Outcomes of implants and prostheses were evaluated, and biological and technical complications were categorized as major or minor. Implant and prosthesis cumulative survival rates were assessed using the life table analysis. A total of twenty-five participants (mean age 63.6 ± 7.3 years) with 33 SCCSIPs were observed for a mean of 68.9 ± 27.9 months (range 1–10 years). A total of 7 out of 245 implants were lost, with no effect on prosthesis survival, leading to cumulative survival rates of 97.1% for implants and 100% for prostheses. The most recurrent minor and major biological complications were soft tissue recession (9%) and late implant failure (2.8%). Among 25 technical complications, porcelain fracture was the only major technical complication, requiring prosthesis removal (1%). Porcelain chipping was the most frequent minor technical complication, affecting 21 crowns (5.4%), which required polishing only. At the end of the follow-up, 69.7% of the prostheses were free of technical complications. Within the limitations of this study, SCCSIP showed promising clinical performance after 1–10 years.

17 June 2026 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDan Littner
Dan Littner
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
SSSamer Salman
Samer Salman
SMShaden Mansour
Shaden Mansour
TGTomer Goldberger
Tomer Goldberger
Introduction: Bite force is a key indicator of masticatory system function and is influenced by various biological and dental factors. Alterations in pulpal innervation and periodontal sensory feedback following root canal treatment (RCT) may affect force regulation during mastication. The aim of this study was to compare pain/discomfort-limited bite force threshold values between root canal-treated and untreated teeth using a digital bite force transducer (GM10). Methods: A total of 131 patients (48 males and 83 females) participated in the study. Bite force measurements were obtained from 447 teeth (248 with RCT and 199 without RCT). Participants were instructed to bite on a digital bite fork until discomfort or pain was experienced. Therefore, the recorded values represent a pain/discomfort-limited bite force threshold rather than true maximal voluntary bite force. Peak force was recorded in Newtons (N). The device was modified with a rubber tip and a protective cover to improve safety and patient comfort. Results: Teeth without RCT demonstrated significantly higher bite force values than root canal-treated teeth (245.39 N vs. 197.06 N, adjusted p = 0.0347). Male participants exhibited significantly higher bite force values than female participants (277.62 N vs. 186.96 N, adjusted p = 0.0016). In addition, molars demonstrated significantly higher bite force values than premolars (227.83 N vs. 202.75 N, adjusted p = 0.0347). Conclusions: Root canal-treated teeth demonstrated lower bite force values than untreated teeth. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of potential confounding factors.