Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña

Dr. Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
CGCristina Jazmin González-Flores
Cristina Jazmin González-Flores
Guillermo Garcia-GarciaGuillermo Garcia-Garcia
Guillermo Garcia-Garcia
ALABEL LERMA
ABEL LERMA
HPHector Perez-Grovas
Hector Perez-Grovas
RMRosa Martha Meda
Rosa Martha Meda
Claudia LermaClaudia Lerma
Claudia Lerma
Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent psychological disorders in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) that have a negative clinical impact. The purpose of our study was to identify factors associated with the presence of depression and anxiety, in a sample of ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis. We included 187 patients from two dialysis facilities, age 18–65 years. Beck’s depression and anxiety inventories, KDQOL36 questionnaire, the cognitive distortion scale and the Mexican scale of resilience were used. Socio-demographic and clinical information was obtained from medical records. Depression was present in 143 (76.4%) patients. Patient with depression were older (33 (26–52) years vs. 30 (24.43) years, p = 0.025), had a lower education level (36% vs. 9%, p = 0.001), used more medications (67% vs. 36%, p = 0.001), had a comorbidity (75% vs. 41%, p = 0.001), and a higher proportion were waiting for a kidney transplant. Anxiety was present in 112 (59.8%) cases. By multivariate analysis, depression was independently associated with lower education, absence of previous kidney transplant, anxiety, higher cognitive distortion, lower psychological resilience, and lower quality of life scores. In conclusion, lower psychological resilience, lower education level, and higher cognitive distortions are factors associated with depression and anxiety in ESRD patients.

1 February 2021 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRoberto Rentería
Roberto Rentería
CBCorina Benjet
Corina Benjet
Raúl A. Gutierrez-GarcíaRaúl A. Gutierrez-García
Raúl A. Gutierrez-García
ARAdrián Ábrego Ramírez
Adrián Ábrego Ramírez
Yesica Cristina Albor SanchezYesica Cristina Albor Sanchez
Yesica Cristina Albor Sanchez
PMPhilippe Mortier
Philippe Mortier

JRJulio Cesar Vargas Ramos
Julio Cesar Vargas Ramos
Claudia LermaClaudia Lerma
Claudia Lerma
RGRebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña
Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña
ALABEL LERMA
ABEL LERMA
LBLilián Elizabeth Bosques-Brugada
Lilián Elizabeth Bosques-Brugada
CGClaudia Margarita González-Fragoso
Claudia Margarita González-Fragoso
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many changes in the education sector worldwide, and school curricula have had to adapt to a non-face-to-face modality. However, international studies have concluded that this modality has affected the academic performance of students. The present study aimed to compare the academic performance of a sample of college students from before the start of quarantine with their current performance, and to test whether various demographic factors influenced these changes in conjunction with alcohol consumption. With a non-experimental, comparative and longitudinal design, we applied an ad hoc questionnaire, in conjunction with the AUDIT questionnaire, in a sample of college students (n = 341), and we also obtained data of academic average and failed subjects. The demographic factors that influenced academic performance were sex (p < 0.01), age (p < 0.01) and alcohol consumption (p = 0.001). Most students showed an improvement in their academic average during the quarantine period. Women without failed subjects and low-risk alcohol consumption obtained a better average in this period. In conclusion sex, age and alcohol consumption level were factors associated with academic performance during the quarantine period due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and women had a higher academic average than men did.

CGCristina Jazmin González-Flores
Cristina Jazmin González-Flores
Guillermo Garcia-GarciaGuillermo Garcia-Garcia
Guillermo Garcia-Garcia
Claudia LermaClaudia Lerma
Claudia Lerma
RGRebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña
Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña
ALABEL LERMA
ABEL LERMA
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) combined with the resilience model (CBI + R) vs CBI alone on depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis replacement therapy. Method: Fifty-three subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The control group (n = 25) was provided with treatment strategies based on a cognitive behavioral approach, while the experimental group (n = 28) were given the same techniques plus resilience model strategies. Five psychological instruments were applied: Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Mexican Resilience Scale, cognitive distortions scale, and the Kidney Disease related Quality of Life questionnaire. Participants were assessed at baseline (before treatment), eight weeks later (end of treatment), and four weeks after the end of treatment (follow up). The results were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures with a Bonferroni-adjusted test method, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The experimental group had significant differences in total and somatic depression as well as differences in the dimensions of cognitive distortions and a significant increase in the dimensions of resilience. The control group had significant differences in all variables but showed lower scores in the evaluated times. Conclusions: The resilience model strengthens and enhances the effectiveness of the cognitive behavioral approach to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with ESRD.

YTYeyetzi C. Torres-Ugalde
Yeyetzi C. Torres-Ugalde
ARAngélica Romero-Palencia
Angélica Romero-Palencia
Alma Delia Roman-GutierrezAlma Delia Roman-Gutierrez
Alma Delia Roman-Gutierrez
Deyanira Ojeda-RamírezDeyanira Ojeda-Ramírez
Deyanira Ojeda-Ramírez
RGRebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña
Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña
Caffeine is the most consumed psychostimulant worldwide. Its use among children is controversial. Although it produces an increase in brain activity, it could hamper growth and development in young consumers. Therefore, the aim of this review was to recognize changes produced by caffeine in children under 12 years of age and to identify the relevant alterations and the conditions of their occurrence. A systematic review of the literature was carried out using PRISMA. Initially, 5468 articles were found from the EBSCO, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Clarivate Analytics databases. In this review, were retained 24 published articles that met the inclusion criteria. The results obtained showed that caffeine consumption hampers children’s growth and development. In contrast, it supports the activation of the central nervous system and brain energy management.

4 September 2020 in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRoberto Rentería
Roberto Rentería
CBCorina Benjet
Corina Benjet
Raúl A. Gutierrez-GarcíaRaúl A. Gutierrez-García
Raúl A. Gutierrez-García
AAAdrián Abrego-Ramírez
Adrián Abrego-Ramírez
Yesica Cristina Albor SanchezYesica Cristina Albor Sanchez
Yesica Cristina Albor Sanchez
PMPhilippe Mortier
Philippe Mortier