Aim: to assess the impact of e-learning through different e-resources among health sciences students. Methodology: A cross-sectional design was conducted among health science students (n = 211; 134 female and 77 male) at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The data was collected using a previously used structured questionnaire to assess the impact of e-resources on learning. Results: The four most frequently used e-resources were: Zoom (38%), YouTube (31%), Google applications (29%), and Blackboard (27%). More than one-third of the students (35%) reportedly used e-resources for three or more hours daily. The majority of the students (55.9%) recognized a gender-related and age-related difference among faculty members in terms of e-resources usage. The majority of the students (58.2%) believe that online resources recommended by faculty members were credible. The majority of students believed that their academic performance was primarily influenced by these features of the e-resources: organization/logic of the content (64.5%), the credibility of the video (64.5%), and up to date “look and feel” of the video (60.6%). The study identified the most frequently used e-resources, gender, and age-related differences in faculty members’ use of e-resources, students’ overwhelming reliance on faculty feedback regarding the credibility of e-resources, and three most important characteristics (organization, credibility, and updated status) of e-resources. Conclusion: e-learning resources had a significant impact on participating students’ education as they were used very frequently during their health sciences’ courses.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pulpotomy done in primary molars under different treatment settings, namely: Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG), Oral Sedation (OS) and General Anesthesia (GA). Methods: In this is retrospective study, dental records of 79 pediatric dental patients treated in university dental hospital between March 2019 to January 2022 were reviewed. Data collected include: (1) age at the time of receiving the treatment, (2) age at the recall visit, (3) gender, and (4) type of clinical setting when providing the dental treatment (BBG, OS, or GA). A total of 154 primary molars received pulpotomy procedure. Recall visits include clinical and radiographic examination. Results: Clinically, six teeth in the BBG group exfoliated. SSC was lost in all groups, but no significant difference was found (P= 0.236). For the percussion and palpation responses, no significant differences were found between the three groups (p= 0.245 and 0.395 respectively). Radiographic findings showed no significant difference between the three groups when roots and pulp canals and bone resorption were examined (p= 0.313 and 0.193 respectively). Signiant differences were found when dentinal bridge formation was assessed (p=0.003). When the quality of the pulpotomy, success of the SSC, and the success of the pulpotomy were compared, no significant differences were found (P>0.05). Conclusions: No significant differences were found between the three groups when the pulpotomy outcomes were assessed. This retrospective study highlights the effect of treatment settings. Future prospective study is recommended.