Natural disasters, such as floods, can cause significant damage to both the environment and human life. Rapid and accurate identification of affected areas is crucial for effective disaster response and recovery efforts. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) computer vision models for flood image classification, by utilizing a semi-supervised learning approach on a dataset named FloodNet. To achieve this, we trained son 11 state-of-the-art (SOTA) models and modified them to suit the classification task at hand. Furthermore, we also introduced a technique of varying the uncertainty offset $\lambda$ in the models to analyze its impact on the performance. The models were evaluated using standard classification metrics such as Loss, Accuracy, F1 Score, Precision, Recall, and ROC-AUC. The results of this study provide a quantitative comparison of the performance of different CNN architectures for flood image classification, as well as the impact of different uncertainty offset $\lambda$. These findings can aid in the development of more accurate and efficient disaster response and recovery systems, which could help in minimizing the impact of natural disasters.

In recent years, deep learning has been applied to many medical imaging fields, including medical image processing, bioinformatics, medical image classification, segmentation, and prediction tasks. Computer-aided detection systems have been widely adopted in brain tumor classification, prediction, detection, diagnosis, and segmentation tasks. This work proposes a novel model that combines the Bayesian algorithm with depth-wise separable convolutions for accurate classification and predictions of brain tumors. We combine Bayesian modeling learning and Convolutional Neural Network learning methods for accurate prediction results to provide the radiologists the means to classify the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images rapidly. After thorough experimental analysis, our proposed model outperforms other state-of-the-art models in terms of validation accuracy, training accuracy, F1-score, recall, and precision. Our model obtained high performances of 99.03% training accuracy and 94.32% validation accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall values of 0.94, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed work is the first neural network model that combines the hybrid effect of depth-wise separable convolutions with the Bayesian algorithm using encoders.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on many lives and the economies of many countries since late December 2019. Early detection with high accuracy is essential to help break the chain of transmission. Several radiological methodologies, such as CT scan and chest X-ray, have been employed in diagnosing and monitoring COVID-19 disease. Still, these methodologies are time-consuming and require trial and error. Machine learning techniques are currently being applied by several studies to deal with COVID-19. This study exploits the latent embeddings of variational autoencoders combined with ensemble techniques to propose three effective EVAE-Net models to detect COVID-19 disease. Two encoders are trained on chest X-ray images to generate two feature maps. The feature maps are concatenated and passed to either a combined or individual reparameterization phase to generate latent embeddings by sampling from a distribution. The latent embeddings are concatenated and passed to a classification head for classification. The COVID-19 Radiography Dataset from Kaggle is the source of chest X-ray images. The performances of the three models are evaluated. The proposed model shows satisfactory performance, with the best model achieving $99.19\%$ and $98.66\%$ accuracy on four classes and three classes, respectively.

Responsiveness—the speed at which a text-to-speech (TTS) system produces audible output—is critical for real-time voice assistants yet has received far less attention than perceptual quality metrics. Existing evaluations often touch on latency but do not establish reproducible, open-source standards that capture responsiveness as a first-class dimension. This work introduces a baseline benchmark designed to fill that gap. Our framework unifies latency distribution, tail latency, and intelligibility within a transparent and dataset-diverse pipeline, enabling a fair and replicable comparison across 13 widely used open-source TTS models. By grounding evaluation in structured input sets ranging from single words to sentence-length utterances and adopting a methodology inspired by standardized inference benchmarks, we capture both typical and worst-case user experiences. Unlike prior studies that emphasize closed or proprietary systems, our focus is on establishing open, reproducible baselines rather than ranking against commercial references. The results reveal substantial variability across architectures, with some models delivering near-instant responses while others fail to meet interactive thresholds. By centering evaluation on responsiveness and reproducibility, this study provides an infrastructural foundation for benchmarking TTS systems and lays the groundwork for more comprehensive assessments that integrate both fidelity and speed.