An investigation was conducted to assess the efficacy of using waste rubber as a substitute for a portion of an aggregate to enhance concrete’s sustainability. For the purpose of accomplishing this objective, a total of 12 specimens were constructed and then subjected to a series of tests to investigate their bending behavior. The samples were constructed with the following dimensions: 1000 mm length and a 100 mm by 150 mm cross-sectional area. A few factors were selected, including the impacts of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and the waste rubber ratio. Based on the volume of aggregates, rubber replacement rates of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% were investigated in this study. To assess the beam bending behavior, the stirrup width and spacing were kept constant at ∅6/10. The longitudinal reinforcement was composed of three diameters: ∅6 at the top (for all beams) and ∅8, ∅10, and ∅12 at the bottom. The experimental results demonstrated that the effects of varying amounts of waste rubber and tension reinforcement on the bending and cracking of reinforced concrete beams (RCBs) were varied. The findings indicate that the incorporation of waste rubber into concrete results in a reduction in both the load-carrying capacity and the level of deformation of the material. Additionally, it was shown that as the amount of waste rubber in the RCB increased, the energy absorption capacity and ultimate load decreased. There was a reduction in energy dissipation of 53.71%, 51.69%, and 40.55% for ∅8 when longitudinal reinforcement was applied at 5%, 10%, and 15% replacement, respectively. Additionally, there were reductions of 25.35%, 9.31%, and 58.15% for ∅10, and 38.69%, 57.79%, and 62.44% for ∅12, respectively.

The growing environmental concern over waste tire accumulation necessitates innovative recycling strategies in construction materials. Therefore, this study aims to develop and evaluate sustainable concrete by integrating waste tire rubber (WTR) aggregates of different sizes and recycled waste tire steel fibers (WTSFs), assessing their combined effects on the mechanical and microstructural performance of concrete through experimental and analytical approaches. WTR aggregates, consisting of fine (0–4 mm), small coarse (5–8 mm), and large coarse (11–22 mm) particles, were used at substitution rates of 0–20%; WTSF was used at volumetric dosages of 0–2%, resulting in a total of 40 mixtures. Mechanical performance was evaluated using density and pressure resistance tests, while microstructural properties were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The findings indicate systematic decreases in density and compressive strength with increasing WTR ratio; the average strength losses were approximately 12%, 20%, and 31% at 5%, 10%, and 20% for WTR substitution, respectively. Among the WTR types, the most negative effect occurred in fine particles (FWTR), while the least negative effect occurred in coarse particles (LCWTR). The addition of WTSF compensated for losses at low/medium dosages (0.5–1.0%) and increased strength by 2–10%. However, high dosages (2.0%) reduced strength by 20–40% due to workability issues, fiber clumping, and void formation. The highest strength was achieved in the 5LCWTR–1WTSF mixture at 36.98 MPa (≈6% increase compared to the reference/control concrete), while the lowest strength was measured at 16.72 MPa in the 20FWTR–2WTSF mixture (≈52% decrease compared to the reference/control). A strong positive correlation was found between density and strength (r, Pearson correlation coefficient, ≈0.77). SEM and EDX analyses confirmed the weak matrix–rubber interface and the crack-bridging effect of steel fibers in mixtures containing fine WTR. Additionally, a hybrid prediction model combining physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and CatBoost, supported by data augmentation strategies, accurately estimated compressive strength. Overall, the results highlight that optimized integration of WTR and WTSF enables sustainable concrete production with acceptable mechanical and microstructural performance.

The study conducted axial tensile strength tests on concrete samples that replaced conventional aggregates with recycled aggregates. In Series I, using FNG instead of FNA resulted in a reduction in compressive strength by 12.8–49.8% and tensile strength by 14.5–44.6%. If the proportion of FNG exceeds 50%, compressive strength decreases by more than 24.5% and tensile strength by more than 27.5%. In Series II, replacing CNA with CRG reduced compressive and tensile strengths by 18.4–32.8% and 5.1–24.9%, respectively; exceeding 40% CRG results in a compressive strength reduction of more than 32.8% and a tensile strength reduction of more than 24.9%. In Series III, samples made with RCA, CNA, and 20% CRG showed a compressive strength decrease of 8.8–22% and a tensile strength decrease of 10.7–26%; RCA80 samples showed maximum reductions. In Series IV, replacing CNA with RCA resulted in compressive and tensile strength reductions of 15.4–34.7% and 13.9–24.3%, respectively; RCA80 samples again showed maximum reductions. Maximum stress unit deformation values (ε_o) increased by 3–58.4% in Series I, 9–80% in Series II, 10–44.9% in Series III, and 9–32% in Series IV. Tensile toughness values showed the highest increase of 35.15% in the CRG40 sample and the lowest of 0.13% in the RCA40-20 sample. The use of glass aggregates in concrete is feasible, but exceeding certain ratios can significantly reduce strength. Concrete can effectively use waste glass as a partial substitute for cement, fine aggregates, or as a filler material, potentially enhancing compressive strength.