Digital Smile Design (DSD) is used in many fields of dentistry. This prospective observational study assessed laypeople’s and dental professionals’ perceptions of a DSD application. SmileCloud, an online DSD platform, was used to create two different designs for three patients; after that, the participants, in a 30-question online illustrated survey, were asked about the most attractive design and other features of the smile. Dentists’ and laypeople’s perceptions about specific DSD features were assessed. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test was used. Descriptive and crosstab analyses compared the respondents’ opinions for each statement. Chi-square tests were used to determine the relationship between the questions and any association with age, gender, and profession. The test results were rated as significant at a p-value < 0.05. A total of 520 participants (dental professionals, students, dental technicians, and laypeople) were enrolled. The statistically significant features were self-esteem related to appearance (p = 0.05), facial and smile symmetry (p = 0.42, p < 0.0001), tooth color (p = 0.012), and symmetry of gums (p < 0.001). For each patient, the design with dominant round upper incisors and perfect symmetry was preferred (p < 0.001). Digital pre-visualization benefits diagnosis and enriches treatment planning. The dentist–dental technician–patient team should be involved in the decision-making process of pre-visualization.

Background: As the demand for digital dentistry constantly increases, digital devices are gradually replacing conventional methods of recording occlusal contacts. The study aimed to assess the inter-rater reliability of occlusal contact point detection using 40 μm articulating paper, Medit i700, and OccluSense and to compare the distribution of occlusal contacts using the articulating paper and intraoral scanner. Material and Methods: The study included 25 participants aged 20 to 30 (13 women and 12 men). Photographs of contact points were taken and marked in maximum intercuspal position (MIP), in protrusive and laterotrusive movements, on working and non-working sides using 40 μm articulating paper and digital devices. The Cohen’s Kappa coefficient assessed the inter-rater reliability. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dependent groups, articulating paper, and Medit i700. Results: The Cohen’s Kappa index showed that almost perfect agreement was achieved with 40 μm articulating paper. Compared to Medit i700, the 40 μm articulating paper showed an increased mean number of contacts per tooth, except for the third molars. Conclusions: The 40 μm articulating paper has detected more overall contacts than the digital devices, particularly in the posterior areas. An ideal method for registering occlusal contacts has not been established yet.

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) may be associated with degenerative disease of temporomandibular joint (TMJ), such as condyle erosion and subchondral cysts. Occlusal splint and cranio-mandibular manual therapy, or combined therapy, is recommended as a conservative treatment to alleviate pain-related signs and symptoms in TMD. This study aimed to assess osseous condylar changes and skeletal changes following occlusal splint and cranio-mandibular manual therapy in TMD using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 24 patients diagnosed with TMD. Combined therapy was performed until pain-related signs and symptoms disappeared. CBCT scans were performed before and after therapy. Osseous structure of condyles and their subsequent modifications were analyzed on CBCT images: flattening, erosion, and subchondral cyst. Sella-Nasion-A point (SNA), Sella-Nasion-B point (SNB), A point-Nasion-B point (ANB), Sella-Articulare-Gonion (Condylar angle), and anterior and posterior facial height (AFH, PFH) were measured on CBCT-generated lateral cephalograms. A paired t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, McNemar test, and Stuart–Maxwell test were used for the statistical analyses. Results: The treatment period with combined therapy was 7.42 ± 3.27 months, and 21 out of 33 TMJ presenting degenerative disease (63.6%) had significant complete remodeling (p < 0.05). Following therapy, SNB significantly decreased from 75.61 ±3.47° to 74.82 ± 3.41° (p = 0.02), ANB significantly increased from 4.05° (3.35–4.9°) to 4.8° (3.3–6.12°) (p < 0.001), AFH significantly increased from 112.85 mm (109.28–118.72) to 115.3 mm (112.58–118.88) (p < 0.001), PFH/AFH significantly decreased from 64.17 (61.39–66.1) to 63 (59.68–64.51) (p = 0.012), and condylar angle significantly increased from 140.84 ± 8.18° to 144.42 ± 8.87° (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Combined therapy promoted significant condylar remodeling in TMJ degenerative disease, along with skeletal changes (mandibular retrusion and increase in facial height). Therapeutic strategies should consider condylar remodeling in TMD. Skeletal and dental parameters should be evaluated prior to occlusal splint therapy.

Occlusal splints are used as a non-invasive treatment for patients diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Another non-invasive treatment option for TMD patients is kinesiotherapy, which may be used alone or in conjunction with occlusal splint therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in the intra-articular spaces of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) after occlusal splint therapy combined with cranio-temporomandibular kinesiotherapy in TMD patients. Twenty-four patients (N = 24) diagnosed with TMD according to Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) were included. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken before and after treatment. The anterior, superior, posterior, and medial joint spaces were measured on the CBCT images, and the condylar ratio was calculated using Pullinger and Hollender’s formula. Additionally, the thickness of the glenoid fossa (GFT), condylar medio-lateral widths (MLW), and condylar height (HCo) were measured. The condylar ratio was significantly higher after treatment (p = 0.049). The changes in dimensions of the anterior, superior, posterior and medial joint spaces were not statistically significant after treatment. No statistically significant differences were found in the dimensions of the GFT, MLW, and HCo post treatment. The condylar position did not shift anteriorly in a statistically significant way after occlusal splint therapy combined with cranio-temporomandibular kinesiotherapy in TMD patients.

Background/Objectives: Eccentric bruxism is a complex parafunctional activity that involves grinding of teeth and occurs more frequently during sleep. This study aimed to assess differences in condylar parameters (sagittal condylar inclination -SCI and Bennett angle -BA) and mandibular and condylar kinematics during functional and parafunctional movements in bruxers and non-bruxers and to assess a digital method for quantifying eccentric bruxism using an optical jaw tracking system (Modjaw^®). Methods: The study group included subjects diagnosed with eccentric bruxism according to validated clinical diagnostic criteria. A control group of non-bruxer subjects with demographic characteristics similar to the study group was considered. Each participant underwent Modjaw^® examination twice to assess the recordings’ repeatability. The anterior guidance, mastication, and simulated eccentric bruxism were recorded. The SCI and BA were computed. The trajectories of interincisal inferior point (IIP), left condyle (LC), and right condyle (RC) in the frontal (F), sagittal (S), and horizontal (H) planes were outlined in rectangles to calculate areas of mastication and areas of eccentric bruxism (mm²). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the recordings’ repeatability. Comparisons between groups were performed using Student’s t- and Mann–Whitney tests. The receiver–operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic quality of the digital method. Results: Twenty bruxers (10 F and 10 M) and 20 non-bruxers (10 F and 10 M) were included. The ICC had values higher than 0.85. SCI, BA, and area of mastication for IIP, LC, and RC were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The area of eccentric bruxism was significantly wider in the bruxers (p < 0.001). According to the ROC curve, the following cut-off areas (mm²) for eccentric bruxism were found in F, S, and H planes: IIP (18.05, 13.43, 16.28); LC (3.74, 10.83, 3.35); and RC (4.21, 10.63, 2.9), corresponding to sensitivity > 0.8, specificity > 0.75 and area under the curve (AUC) > 0.85. Conclusions: Mandibular and condylar kinematics during functional movements were similar in bruxers and non-bruxers. A novel digital method for quantifying eccentric bruxism was found using Modjaw^®, which could serve as a tool for early detection of eccentric bruxism before the onset of clinical consequences.

Background: The main aim of this research was to assess the reliability of two systems designed specifically for condylar movement recording using condylar slope and Bennett angle information. The objectives were to evaluate the validity of two subsequent null hypotheses: (1) there is no significant difference between the measurements of condylar slope and Bennett angle taken at T0 (initial) and T1 (after one week) using the same equipment; (2) there is no notable difference in the values of the condylar slope and Bennett angle measurements obtained using Modjaw and Cadiax 2. Methods: An observational, descriptive, and prospective study was conducted with a selected group of 25 individuals (13 females and 12 males) aged between 22 and 27. Results: The results of Cadiax 2 and Modjaw showed excellent measurement repeatability for both parameters, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) above 0.90, indicating excellent reliability between T0 and T1, both at 3 mm and 5 mm of displacement. Modjaw had an overall average value relatively higher than Cadiax 2, even though Modjaw’s condylar slope at 5mm had a significantly lower average value (37.4 ± 6.31) with an interval of 24.5–48.1, which was lower than Cadiax 2 (48.4 ± 10.6) with an interval of 30.5–68.5. Regarding the primary aim, it can be stated that both Modjaw and Cadiax 2 demonstrated excellent repeatability on their own, demonstrating robust reliability since there was no discernible difference between the T0 and T1 measurements. On the contrary, analyses of the two devices’ measured values for the secondary aim showed a considerable difference. Conclusions: Even though each device is reliable on its own, the absolute values that are obtained are different. Technological differences between the systems may account for these variations.