Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by a variety of motor and non-motor symptoms, some of them pertaining to gait and balance. The use of sensors for the monitoring of patients’ mobility and the extraction of gait parameters, has emerged as an objective method for assessing the efficacy of their treatment and the progression of the disease. To that end, two popular solutions are pressure insoles and body-worn IMU-based devices, which have been used for precise, continuous, remote, and passive gait assessment. In this work, insole and IMU-based solutions were evaluated for assessing gait impairment, and were subsequently compared, producing evidence to support the use of instrumentation in everyday clinical practice. The evaluation was conducted using two datasets, generated during a clinical study, in which patients with PD wore, simultaneously, a pair of instrumented insoles and a set of wearable IMU-based devices. The data from the study were used to extract and compare gait features, independently, from the two aforementioned systems. Subsequently, subsets comprised of the extracted features, were used by machine learning algorithms for gait impairment assessment. The results indicated that insole gait kinematic features were highly correlated with those extracted from IMU-based devices. Moreover, both had the capacity to train accurate machine learning models for the detection of PD gait impairment.

The prediction of obstructive atherosclerotic disease has significant clinical meaning for the decision making. In this study, a machine learning predictive model based on gradient boosting classifier is presented, aiming to identify the patients of high CAD risk and those of low CAD risk. The machine learning methodology includes five steps: the preprocessing of the input data, the class imbalance handling applying the Easy Ensemble algorithm, the recursive feature elimination technique implementation, the implementation of gradient boosting classifier, and finally the model evaluation, while the fine tuning of the presented model was implemented through a randomized search optimization of the model’s hyper-parameters over an internal 3-fold cross-validation. In total, 187 participants with suspicion of CAD previously underwent CTCA during EVINCI and ARTreat clinical studies and were prospectively included to undergo follow-up CTCA. The predictive model was trained using imaging data (geometrical and blood flow based) and non-imaging data. The overall predictive accuracy of the model was 0.81, using both imaging and non-imaging data. The innovative aspect of the proposed study is the combination of imaging-based data with the typical CAD risk factors to provide an integrated CAD risk-predictive model.

Carotid artery disease is considered a major cause of strokes and there is a need for early disease detection and management. Although imaging techniques have been developed for the diagnosis of carotid artery disease and different imaging-based markers have been proposed for the characterization of atherosclerotic plaques, there is still need for a definition of high-risk plaques in asymptomatic patients who may benefit from surgical intervention. Measurement of circulating biomarkers is a promising method to assist in patient-specific disease management, but the lack of robust clinical evidence limits their use as a standard of care. The purpose of this review paper is to present circulating biomarkers related to carotid artery diagnosis and prognosis, which are mainly provided by statistical-based clinical studies. The result of our investigation showed that typical well-established inflammatory biomarkers and biomarkers related to patient lipid profiles are associated with carotid artery disease. In addition to this, more specialized types of biomarkers, such as endothelial and cell adhesion, matrix degrading, and metabolic biomarkers seem to be associated with different carotid artery disease outputs, assisting vascular specialists in selecting patients at high risk for stroke and in need of intervention.

Background: Falls among older adults are a significant public health concern, often leading to severe injuries, decreased quality of life, and substantial health care costs. Smart wearable technologies for balance rehabilitation present a promising avenue for addressing the falls epidemic, capable of providing detailed objective movement data, engaging visuals, and real-time feedback. With the recent and rapid evolution of innovative technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR) or virtual reality (VR), and motion tracking, there is a need to evaluate the market to identify the most effective and accessible smart balance systems currently available. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the current landscape of smart wearable technology systems for balance rehabilitation in older adults at risk of falls. In addition, it aims to compare market-available systems to the telerehabilitation of balance clinical and economic decision support system (TeleRehab DSS), a recently developed smart balance system. Methods: A scoping review and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis was completed, exploring the landscape of smart balance systems in older adults at risk of falls. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were systematically searched for articles in English from July 1, 2014, to July 1, 2024. Gray literature searches of relevant institutions and web pages were also conducted. The database search and commercial systems were then compared against the TeleRehab DSS in a SWOT analysis. Results: The scoping review yielded 17 systems that met the inclusion criteria; 10 investigational systems and 7 commercially available systems. Out of 10 studies, only 1 reported the use of intelligent learning or AI, 8 studies reported the use of motion tracking, and 9 studies used virtual reality. Of the studies incorporating motion tracking, 3 provided feedback as either visual or auditory. All but 2 studies reported the use of gamification, and 7 studies incorporated balance exercises. In total, 2 studies reported remote delivery, with 5 being clinician-supervised and 4 providing a clinician report. The SWOT analysis of TeleRehab DSS against the 7 market-available smart balance systems revealed several unique advantages, including personalized therapy with AI-DSS, AR for real-world interaction, enhanced clinician involvement, and comprehensive data analytics. Conclusions: The findings from this scoping review highlight the rapid evolution of smart balance systems, yet significant gaps remain in AI integration, remote accessibility, and clinician-driven data analytics. Despite limitations such as cost, accessibility, and user training requirements, TeleRehab DSS emerges as a significant innovation, addressing many of these gaps through AI-driven personalization, AR for real-world interaction, and real-time clinician monitoring. These features position it as a next-generation solution that aligns closely with the evolving needs of patients and clinicians. The results of this review provide valuable insights for future research, supporting the need for further validation studies and the development of more intelligent and accessible balance rehabilitation technologies.

Background: Falls have high socioeconomic costs. Information and communication technologies may support provision and monitoring of multisensory (MSR) physiotherapy programmes. The HOLOBalance platform used augmented reality holograms to provide patient-centred, individualised MSR.Objectives: To determine the platform’s safety, acceptability and feasibility, investigate functional gait and dynamic balance benefits and provide data for a definitive trial.Design and setting: Single-blinded pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. Interventions were conducted at clinical sites or participants’ homes in three European countries.Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (median age 73 years; 64.2% female) at risk of falls were enrolled (May 2020-August 2021).Methods: Participants were randomised to an 8-week clinic or home-based telerehabilitation MSR or OTAGO (control group) programme. Compliance, satisfaction, and adverse events determined feasibility. Clinical outcomes, assessed (blinded) within one-week prior to and post-intervention, included functional gait assessment (FGA), Mini BESTest and cognitive function.Results: Randomisation to completion rate was 76.15% with 109 participants recruited (n = 289 screened). Drop-out rate was similar between groups. Adverse events were reported (n = 3) in the control group. Sixty-nine percent would recommend the HOLOBalance intervention. Findings were similar for the home and clinic-based arms of each intervention; data was combined for analysis. FGA (95%CI [1.63, 4.19]) and Mini-BESTest (95%CI [1.46, 3.93]) showed greater improvement in the HOLOBalance group with a clinically meaningful change of 4/30 noted for the FGA.Conclusions: HOLObalance was feasible to implement and acceptable to older adults at risk of falls, with FGA and Mini-BEST improvements exceeding those for the OTAGO programme. A definitive trial is warranted.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs have shown promising results in tertiary prevention. However, achieving sustained behavioral changes remains a challenge. Objective: The TIMELY project aims to develop and evaluate a personalized, artificial intelligence–driven eHealth platform and app to support sustainable behavior change during phase-3 CR, subsequently reducing cardiac risk scores. Methods: An international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TIMELY integrated platform and app. A total of 360 patients with cardiac conditions will be approached to participate in the study across Germany, Spain, and the Netherlands. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either the intervention group or the control group (care as usual). The intervention group will receive fully web-based, behavior change support through the TIMELY app, with personalized exercise prescription, chatbot assistance, and monitoring devices (eg, activity watch). Both groups will continue to receive care as usual, complete validated questionnaires, undergo physical tests, and provide blood samples. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Trial recruitment has been finalized in July 2024. A total of 358 patients have been recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention (n=180, 50.1%) or care-as-usual (n=178, 49.7%) condition. As of January 2025, the 6-month follow-up has been completed for all participants. Follow-up data collection will be completed in May 2025. Results regarding the primary and secondary objectives are expected in September 2025. Conclusions: This project will test a personalized platform and app, supported by artificial intelligence and designed to support health behavior change during phase-3 CR. It will target multiple health behaviors, with a primary focus on physical activity and fitness levels, using an integrated approach. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05955625; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05955625 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/66283