Carlos Aguilar-Pérez

Dr. Carlos Aguilar-Pérez


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 February 2020 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMaria Denisse Montoya Flores
Maria Denisse Montoya Flores
IMIsabel Cristina Molina-Botero
Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero
JAJacobo Arango
Jacobo Arango
JRJOSE LUIS ROMANO
JOSE LUIS ROMANO
FSFrancisco Javier Solorio-Sánchez
Francisco Javier Solorio-Sánchez
Juan Carlos Ku-VeraJuan Carlos Ku-Vera
Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
The effects of dietary inclusion of dried Leucaena leucocephala leaves (DLL) on nutrient digestibility, fermentation parameters, microbial rumen population, and production of enteric methane (CH4) in crossbred heifers were evaluated. Four heifers were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design consisting of four periods and four levels of inclusion of DLL: 0%, 12%, 24%, and 36% of dry matter (DM) intake. Results showed that DM intake (DMI), organic matter intake, and gross energy intake (GEI) were similar (p > 0.05) among treatments. Apparent digestibility of organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, and energy decreased with increasing levels of DLL in the ration (p < 0.05). In contrast, digestible crude protein (CP) was higher (p < 0.05) in treatments with 12% and 24% DM of DLL. The inclusion of DLL did not affect (p > 0.05) rumen pH and total volatile fatty acids. Rumen microbial community was not affected (p > 0.05) by treatment. There was a linear reduction (p < 0.05) in CH4 emissions as the levels of DLL in the ration were increased. Results of this study suggest that an inclusion of 12% DM of ration as DLL enhances digestible CP and reduces daily production of enteric CH4 without adversely affecting DMI, rumen microbial population, and fermentation parameters.

1 June 2017 in Animal Feed Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAngel T. Piñeiro-Vázquez
Angel T. Piñeiro-Vázquez
GJGuillermo O. Jiménez-Ferrer
Guillermo O. Jiménez-Ferrer
ACAlfonso J. Chay-Canul
Alfonso J. Chay-Canul
FCFernando Casanova-Lugo
Fernando Casanova-Lugo
VDVíctor F. Díaz-Echeverría
Víctor F. Díaz-Echeverría
JKJuan C. Ku-Vera
Juan C. Ku-Vera

9 November 2019 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RJRafael Jiménez-Ocampo
Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo
SSSara Stephanie Valencia Salazar
Sara Stephanie Valencia Salazar
CPCarmen Elisa Pinzón-Díaz
Carmen Elisa Pinzón-Díaz
EHESPERANZA HERRERA-TORRES
ESPERANZA HERRERA-TORRES
CACarlos Aguilar-Pérez
Carlos Aguilar-Pérez
Juan Carlos Ku-VeraJuan Carlos Ku-Vera
Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
Livestock production is a main source of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHG). The main gases are CH4 with a global warming potential (GWP) 25 times and nitrous oxide (N2O) with a GWP 298 times, that of carbon dioxide (CO2) arising from enteric fermentation or from manure management, respectively. In fact, CH4 is the second most important GHG emitted globally. This current scenario has increased the concerns about global warming and encouraged the development of intensive research on different natural compounds to be used as feed additives in ruminant rations and modify the rumen ecosystem, fermentation pattern, and mitigate enteric CH4. The compounds most studied are the secondary metabolites of plants, which include a vast array of chemical substances like polyphenols and saponins that are present in plant tissues of different species, but the results are not consistent, and the extraction cost has constrained their utilization in practical animal feeding. Other new compounds of interest include polysaccharide biopolymers such as chitosan, mainly obtained as a marine co-product. As with other compounds, the effect of chitosan on the rumen microbial population depends on the source, purity, dose, process of extraction, and storage. In addition, it is important to identify compounds without adverse effects on rumen fermentation. The present review is aimed at providing information about chitosan for dietary manipulation to be considered for future studies to mitigate enteric methane and reduce the environmental impact of GHGs arising from livestock production systems. Chitosan is a promising agent with methane mitigating effects, but further research is required with in vivo models to establish effective daily doses without any detrimental effect to the animal and consider its addition in practical rations as well as the economic cost of methane mitigation.

23 March 2017 in Tropical Animal Health and Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SAS. Albores-Moreno
S. Albores-Moreno
JGJosé Armando Armando Alayón Gamboa
José Armando Armando Alayón Gamboa
AAA. J. Ayala-Burgos
A. J. Ayala-Burgos
FSF. J. Solorio-Sánchez
F. J. Solorio-Sánchez
CACarlos Aguilar-Pérez
Carlos Aguilar-Pérez
JKJ. C. Ku-Vera
J. C. Ku-Vera

5 February 2016 in Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAngel Trinidad Piñeiro-Vázquez
Angel Trinidad Piñeiro-Vázquez
JCJ. R. Canul‐Solis
J. R. Canul‐Solis
JGJosé Armando Armando Alayón Gamboa
José Armando Armando Alayón Gamboa
ACAlfonso J. Chay-Canul
Alfonso J. Chay-Canul
AAA. J. Ayala‐Burgos
A. J. Ayala‐Burgos
JKJ. C. Ku‐Vera
J. C. Ku‐Vera

30 June 2009 in Livestock Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CACarlos Aguilar-Pérez
Carlos Aguilar-Pérez
JKJuan Ku-Vera
Juan Ku-Vera
FCFernando Centurión-Castro
Fernando Centurión-Castro
PGPhil Garnsworthy
Phil Garnsworthy