Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong

Dr. Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2020 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CAChe Ahmad Azlan
Che Ahmad Azlan
JWJeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
LTLi Kuo Tan
Li Kuo Tan
MHMuhammad Shahrun Nizam A.D. Huri
Muhammad Shahrun Nizam A.D. Huri
NUNgie Min Ung
Ngie Min Ung
KNKwan Hoong Ng
Kwan Hoong Ng

1 May 2021 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPTing Pang
Ting Pang
JWJeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
WNWei Lin Ng
Wei Lin Ng
CCChee Seng Chan
Chee Seng Chan

21 June 2018 in British Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSook Sam Leong
Sook Sam Leong
JWJeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
MSMohammad Nazri Md Shah
Mohammad Nazri Md Shah
AVAnushya Vijayananthan
Anushya Vijayananthan
MJMaisarah Jalalonmuhali
Maisarah Jalalonmuhali
KNKwan Hoong Ng
Kwan Hoong Ng
Objective:To investigate the use of shear wave elastography (SWE)-derived estimates of Young’s modulus (YM) as an indicator to detect abnormal renal tissue diagnosed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).Methods:The study comprised 106 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and 203 control subjects. Conventional ultrasound was performed to measure the kidney length and cortical thickness. SWE imaging was performed to measure renal parenchymal stiffness. Diagnostic performance of SWE and conventional ultrasound were correlated with serum creatinine, urea levels and eGFR.Results:Pearson’s correlation coefficients revealed a negative correlation between YM measurements and eGFR (r = −0.576, p < 0.0001). Positive correlations between YM measurements and age (r = 0.321, p < 0.05), serum creatinine (r = 0.375, p < 0.0001) and urea (r = 0.287, p < 0.0001) were also observed. The area under the ROC curve for SWE (0.87) was superior to conventional ultrasound alone (0.35–0.37). The cut-off value of less or...

18 April 2012 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
IFI. Fuduli
I. Fuduli
MCM. Carolan
M. Carolan
MPMarco Petasecca
Marco Petasecca
MLMichael Lerch
Michael Lerch
ARAnatoly B. Rosenfeld
Anatoly B. Rosenfeld

8 June 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FYFasihah Hanum Yusof
Fasihah Hanum Yusof
NUNgie Min Ung
Ngie Min Ung
JWJeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
WJWei Loong Jong
Wei Loong Jong
VAVannyat Ath
Vannyat Ath
KNKwan Hoong Ng
Kwan Hoong Ng
This study was carried out to investigate the suitability of using the optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) in measuring surface dose during radiotherapy. The water equivalent depth (WED) of the OSLD was first determined by comparing the surface dose measured using the OSLD with the percentage depth dose at the buildup region measured using a Markus ionization chamber. Surface doses were measured on a solid water phantom using the OSLD and compared against the Markus ionization chamber and Gafchromic EBT3 film measurements. The effect of incident beam angles on surface dose was also studied. The OSLD was subsequently used to measure surface dose during tangential breast radiotherapy treatments in a phantom study and in the clinical measurement of 10 patients. Surface dose to the treated breast or chest wall, and on the contralateral breast were measured. The WED of the OSLD was found to be at 0.4 mm. For surface dose measurement on a solid water phantom, the Markus ionization chamber measured 15.95% for 6 MV photon beam and 12.64% for 10 MV photon beam followed by EBT3 film (23.79% and 17.14%) and OSLD (37.77% and 25.38%). Surface dose increased with the increase of the incident beam angle. For phantom and patient breast surface dose measurement, the response of the OSLD was higher than EBT3 film. The in-vivo measurements were also compared with the treatment planning system predicted dose. The OSLD measured higher dose values compared to dose at the surface (Hp(0.0)) by a factor of 2.37 for 6 MV and 2.01 for 10 MV photon beams, respectively. The measurement of absorbed dose at the skin depth of 0.4 mm by the OSLD can still be a useful tool to assess radiation effects on the skin dermis layer. This knowledge can be used to prevent and manage potential acute skin reaction and late skin toxicity from radiotherapy treatments.

1 January 2020 in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSook Sam Leong
Sook Sam Leong
JWJeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
MSMohammad Nazri Md Shah
Mohammad Nazri Md Shah
AVAnushya Vijayananthan
Anushya Vijayananthan
MJMaisarah Jalalonmuhali
Maisarah Jalalonmuhali
KNKwan Hoong Ng
Kwan Hoong Ng