Elisa Santovito

Dr. Elisa Santovito

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 July 2010 in Molecular Plant Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTiziana Mascia
Tiziana Mascia
ESElisa Santovito
Elisa Santovito
DGDonato Gallitelli
Donato Gallitelli
Fabrizio CilloFabrizio Cillo
Fabrizio Cillo
SUMMARY: The quantification of messenger RNA expression levels by real‐time reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction requires the availability of reference genes that are stably expressed regardless of the experimental conditions under study. We examined the expression variations of a set of eight candidate reference genes in tomato leaf and root tissues subjected to the infection of five taxonomically and molecularly different plant viruses and a viroid, inducing diverse pathogenic effects on inoculated plants. Parallel analyses by three commonly used dedicated algorithms, geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper, showed that different viral infections and tissues of origin influenced, to some extent, the expression levels of these genes. However, all algorithms showed high levels of stability for glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase and ubiquitin , indicated as the most suitable endogenous transcripts for normalization in both tissue types. Actin and uridylate kinase were also stably expressed throughout the infected tissues, whereas cyclophilin showed tissue‐specific expression stability only in root samples. By contrast, two widely employed reference genes, 18S ribosomal RNA and elongation factor 1α , demonstrated highly variable expression levels that should discourage their use for normalization. In addition, expression level analysis of ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase showed the modulation of the two genes in virus‐infected tomato leaves and roots. The relative quantification of the two genes varied according to the reference genes selected, thus highlighting the importance of the choice of the correct normalization method in such experiments.

1 June 2021 in Food Packaging and Shelf Life
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Loris PintoLoris Pinto
Loris Pinto
Maria A. BonifacioMaria A. Bonifacio
Maria A. Bonifacio
EGElvira De Giglio
Elvira De Giglio
ESElisa Santovito
Elisa Santovito
SCStefania Cometa
Stefania Cometa
FBFederico Baruzzi
Federico Baruzzi

22 October 2018 in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDonato Greco
Donato Greco
VDVito D'Ascanio
Vito D'Ascanio
ESElisa Santovito
Elisa Santovito
ALAntonio F. Logrieco
Antonio F. Logrieco
GAGiuseppina Avantaggiato
Giuseppina Avantaggiato

8 March 2016 in Analytical Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EPElisabetta Primiceri
Elisabetta Primiceri
MCMaria Serena Chiriacò
Maria Serena Chiriacò
FFFrancesco de Feo
Francesco de Feo
ESElisa Santovito
Elisa Santovito
Vincenzina FuscoVincenzina Fusco
Vincenzina Fusco
Giuseppe MaruccioGiuseppe Maruccio
Giuseppe Maruccio
Foodborne illnesses caused by the ingestion of foods contaminated with pathogens and/or their toxins are still one of the major public health threats worldwide. Disposable devices, allowing the on-site, early and multiplexed quantitative detection of pathogenic bacteria are therefore highly sought. Herein, we report biochips that are able to quantitatively detect two of the most common food-associated pathogens, namely Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus from the suspensions of bacteria stationary-phase broth culture. With a detection limit as low as 5.00 CFU ml−1 for L. monocytogenes and 1.26 CFU ml−1 for S. aureus, our platform may be a promising point-of-care device not only for clinical and food diagnostics but also for biosecurity purposes.

1 August 2015 in International Dairy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMaria Di Lena
Maria Di Lena
GQGrazia M. Quero
Grazia M. Quero
ESElisa Santovito
Elisa Santovito
JVJoanna Verran
Joanna Verran
MAMaria De Angelis
Maria De Angelis
Vincenzina FuscoVincenzina Fusco
Vincenzina Fusco

1 September 2018 in Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESElisa Santovito
Elisa Santovito
DGDonato Greco
Donato Greco
ALAntonio F. Logrieco
Antonio F. Logrieco
GAGiuseppina Avantaggiato
Giuseppina Avantaggiato
The population increase in the last century was the first cause of the industrialization of animal productions, together with the necessity to satisfy the high food demand and the lack of space and land for the husbandry practices. As a consequence, the farmers moved from extensive to intensive agricultural systems and introduced new practices, such as the administration of antimicrobial drugs. Antibiotics were then used as growth promoters and for disease prevention. The uncontrolled and continuous use of antibiotics contributed to the spread of antibiotic resistance in animals, and this had adverse impacts on human health. This emergence led the European Union, in 2003, to ban the marketing and use of antibiotics as growth promoters, and for prophylaxis purposes from January 2006. This ban caused problems in farms, due to the decrease in animal performances (weight gain, feed conversion ratio, reproduction, etc.), and the rise in the incidence of certain diseases, such as those induced by Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes. The economic losses due to the ban increased the interest in researching alternative strategies for the prophylaxis of infectious diseases and for health and growth promotion, such as feed additives. Yeast-based materials, such as cell wall extract, represent promising alternatives to antibiotics, on the base of their prebiotic activity and their claimed capacity to bind enteropathogenic bacteria. Several authors reported examples of the effectiveness of yeast cell wall products in adsorbing bacteria, but there is a lack of knowledge on the mechanisms involved in this interaction. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current approaches used for the control of pathogenic bacteria in feed, with a particular focus on the use of yeast-derived materials proposed to control zoonoses at farm level, and on their effect on animal health.