Titanium has been the material of choice for dental implant fixtures due to its exceptional qualities, such as its excellent balance of rigidity and stiffness. Since zirconia is a soft-tissue-friendly material and caters to esthetic demands, it is an alternative to titanium for use in implants. Nevertheless, bone density plays a vital role in determining the material and design of implants. Compromised bone density leads to both early and late implant failures due to a lack of implant stability. Therefore, this narrative review aims to investigate the influence of implant material/design and surgical technique on bone density from both biomechanical and biological standpoints. Relevant articles were included for analysis. Dental implant materials can be fabricated from titanium, zirconia, and PEEK. In terms of mechanical and biological aspects, titanium is still the gold standard for dental implant materials. Additionally, the macro- and microgeometry of dental implants play a role in determining and planning the appropriate treatment because it can enhance the mechanical stress transmitted to the bone tissue. Under low-density conditions, a conical titanium implant design, longer length, large diameter, reverse buttress with self-tapping, small thread pitch, and deep thread depth are recommended. Implant material, implant design, surgical techniques, and bone density are pivotal factors affecting the success rates of dental implant placement in low-density bone. Further study is required to find the optimal implant material for a clinical setting’s bone state.

Customized healing abutments have been introduced in clinical practice along with implant surgery to preserve or create natural-appearing hard and soft tissue around the implant. This provides the benefits of reducing the overall treatment time by eliminating the second stage and reducing the elapsed time of the fabrication of the final prostheses. This article aims to review the types and properties of materials used for the fabrication of customized healing abutments and their clinical applications. Articles published in English on customized healing abutments were searched in Google Scholar, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Scopus databases up to August 2022. The relevant articles were selected and included in this literature review. Customized healing abutments can be fabricated from materials available for dental implants, including PEEK, PMMA, zirconia, resin composite, and titanium. All the materials can be used following both immediate and delayed implant placement. Each material provides different mechanical and biological properties that influence the peri-implant tissues. In conclusion, the studies have demonstrated promising outcomes for all the materials. However, further investigation comparing the effects of each material on peri-implant soft and hard tissues is required.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of customized healing abutments compared to prefabricated healing abutments in immediate implant sites. Twelve patients requiring single immediate implant placement were divided into two groups: a prefabricated group received prefabricated titanium healing abutments, and a customized group received a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) customized healing abutments fabricated based on the individuals’ digital impressions. Outcomes, including peri-implant horizontal and vertical soft tissue alteration, bone level change, volume change, pain score, and pink esthetic score (PES) change, were evaluated at the 1-, 4-, and 6-month follow-ups compared to pre-extraction teeth. At the 1- and 4-month follow-ups, the customized group had a significantly lower buccal volume variation (BVv). At the 6-month follow-up, neither group showed any significant difference in the marginal bone change; however, the customized group had a significantly lower PES change and a lower pain score. In the anterior and premolar regions, the customized group showed the preservation of peri-implant buccal horizontal soft tissue and buccal volume, while in the molar regions, the preservation of papilla height and midfacial height was observed. The morphology of the customized healing abutment demonstrated a better trend in preservation of peri-implant soft tissue, esthetic outcomes, and lower patient discomfort in immediate implant sites.