Dimitrios MENDRINOS

Mr. Dimitrios MENDRINOS

Center for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving, Pikermi, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2003 in Geothermics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBurkhard Sanner
Burkhard Sanner
CKConstantine Karytsas
Constantine Karytsas
DMDimitrios MENDRINOS
Dimitrios MENDRINOS
LRLadislaus Rybach
Ladislaus Rybach

1 May 2020 in Geothermics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Giorgia Dalla SantaGiorgia Dalla Santa
Giorgia Dalla Santa
AGAntonio Galgaro
Antonio Galgaro
RSRaffaele Sassi
Raffaele Sassi
MCMatteo Cultrera
Matteo Cultrera
PSPaolo Scotton
Paolo Scotton
ABAdriana Bernardi
Adriana Bernardi

1 March 2010 in Geothermics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDimitrios MENDRINOS
Dimitrios MENDRINOS
ICIoannis Choropanitis
Ioannis Choropanitis
OPOlympia Polyzou
Olympia Polyzou
CKConstantine Karytsas
Constantine Karytsas


17 June 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DQDavide Quaggiotto
Davide Quaggiotto
Angelo ZarrellaAngelo Zarrella
Angelo Zarrella
GEGiuseppe Emmi
Giuseppe Emmi
MCMichele De Carli
Michele De Carli
LPLuc Pockele
Luc Pockele
Adriana BernardiAdriana Bernardi
Adriana Bernardi
In this study, the thermal behavior of the coaxial and double U borehole heat exchangers was investigated using numerical simulations in both the long- and short-term. As a reference for borehole heat exchanger specifications, the existing coaxial and double U probes of a geothermal heat pump installed within the Horizon 2020 research project named “Cheap GSHPs” were considered. Nine years of simulations revealed that when borehole heat exchangers are subjected to a balanced thermal load, and intermittent operating modes of the ground source heat pump system are set, the coaxial pipes’ configuration provides better thermal performance due to the higher thermal capacitance of the heat-carrier fluid and the lower borehole thermal resistance. The analysis was conducted considering two different types of ground with different thermal conductivity values. As result, the more conductive ground type highlights the higher yield of the coaxial probe.

16 September 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
sergio Bobbosergio Bobbo
sergio Bobbo
LFLaura Fedele
Laura Fedele
MCMarco Curcio
Marco Curcio
ABAnna Bet
Anna Bet
MCMichele De Carli
Michele De Carli
ABAdriana Bernardi
Adriana Bernardi
In the European Union (EU), buildings are responsible for about 40% of the total final energy consumption, and 36% of the European global CO2 emissions. The European Commission released directives to push for the enhancement of the buildings energy performance and identified, beside the retrofit of the current building stock, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems as the other main way to increase renewable energy sharing and overall building energy efficiency. For this purpose, Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs) represent one of the most interesting technologies to provide energy for heating, cooling, and domestic water production in residential applications, ensuring a significant reduction (e.g., up to 44% compared with air-source heat pumps) of energy consumption and the corresponding emissions. At present, GSHPs mainly employ the refrigerant R410A as the working fluid, which has a Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 2087. However, following the EU Regulation No. 517/2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases, this high GWP refrigerant will have to be substituted for residential applications in the next years. Thus, to increase the sustainability of GSHPs, it is necessary to identify short time alternative fluids with lower GWP, before finding medium-long term solutions characterized by very low GWP. This is one of the tasks of the UE project "Most Easy, Efficient, and Low-Cost Geothermal Systems for Retrofitting Civil and Historical Buildings" (acronym GEO4CIVHIC). Here, a thorough thermodynamic analysis, based on both energy and exergy analysis, will be presented to perform a comparison between different fluids as substitutes for R410A, considered as the benchmark for GSHP applications. These fluids have been selected considering their lower flammability with respect to hydrocarbons (mainly R290), that is one of the main concerns for the companies. A parametric analysis has been performed, for a reversible GSHP cycle, at various heat source and sink conditions, with the aim to identify the fluid giving the best energetic performance and to evaluate the distribution of the irreversibilities along the cycle. Considering all these factors, R454B turned out to be the most suitable fluid to use in a ground source heat pump, working at given conditions. Special attention has been paid to the compression phase and the heat transfer in evaporator and condenser.