Abdelkader Abdullah

Dr. Abdelkader Abdullah

College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 655, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2022 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Abdelkader AbdullahAbdelkader Abdullah
Abdelkader Abdullah
WAWissam Hameed Alawee
Wissam Hameed Alawee
SMSuha Abdelilah Mohammed
Suha Abdelilah Mohammed
UAUmar Fahed Alqsair
Umar Fahed Alqsair
HDHayder Abed Dhahad
Hayder Abed Dhahad
ZOZakaria Mohamed Omara
Zakaria Mohamed Omara

29 October 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSuha A. Mohammed
Suha A. Mohammed
ABAli Basem
Ali Basem
ZOZ. M. Omara
Z. M. Omara
WAWissam H. Alawee
Wissam H. Alawee
HDhayder dhahad
hayder dhahad
Ahmed Al-AmieryAhmed Al-Amiery
Ahmed Al-Amiery
A practical study was conducted to improve the performance of conventional pyramidal solar stills (CPSS) using two types of fins with differing geometries, as well as nanocomposites of TiO2 and graphene. The first fin was hollow, cylindrical, and perforated (HCPF), whereas the second fin was an inclined perforated rectangular fin (IPRF). The fins were integrated with the base of a solar still to evaluate their performance in comparison with a CPSS. The obtained experimental results demonstrated that the pyramidal solar still with hollow perforated cylindrical fins (PSS-HCPF) and the pyramidal solar still with inclined perforated rectangular fins (PSS-IPRF) produced more distillate than the PSS-HCPF and CPSS under all examined conditions. The daily productivities of the CPSS, PSS-HCPF, and PSS-IPRF were 3718, 4840, and 5750 mL/m2, respectively, with the PSS-HCPF and PSS-IPRF improving the productivity by 31.3% and 55.9%, respectively, compared to that of the CPSS. In addition, using nanocomposites with PSS-IPRF improved the daily distillate production by 82.1%.

26 August 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Fadl A. EssaFadl A. Essa
Fadl A. Essa
Abdelkader AbdullahAbdelkader Abdullah
Abdelkader Abdullah
HMHasan Sh. Majdi
Hasan Sh. Majdi
ABAli Basem
Ali Basem
HDhayder dhahad
hayder dhahad
Talal YusafTalal Yusaf
Talal Yusaf
Although water is the second most important fluid, after air, found on the Earth, there is a vital problem in the availability of water for many organisms, and this problem faces the whole world. As a result, scientists have developed many methods of purifying the saline/brackish water to be suitable for different uses in addition to the purpose of drinking. Fortunately, solar distillation is very rewarding in terms of operating costs and costs for a liter of freshwater distillated with using clean and environmentally friendly energy. Solar distiller is one of the solar distillation systems devices, which is simple in construction, cheap, and easy to use but it has the drawback of low productivity. This article aims to provide a summary of the different ideas and works on solar stills through different variables that affect the performance of distillers. In contrast to the review papers dealing with this topic, this paper contains comprehensive and complete details and careful reviews of all the variables that affect the performance of distillers. Therefore, it is like a ladder in front of the authors until they reach the recent of what has been studied on the distillers in a simplified way to save time and effort, which will help them to come up with different ideas that were not easily studied. Thus, this paper introduces an overview on the detailed parameters affecting the performance of solar stills. These parameters are climatic, design, and operating factors. Climatic factors consist of solar radiation, ambient temperature, air speed, and dusty and cloudy weather. While the design factors include the evaporative and exposure surface areas, glazing cover material, inclination, and thickness, distiller material, and of insulating material and thickness. Whist, the operating parameters consist of the water temperature, feed water temperature, applying vacuum, temperature difference between water and glass cover, and hybrid systems. From the extensive literature, it is concluded that the climatic, design, and operating factors significantly affect the performance of the solar still. Finally, some points are proposed for further investigation.

16 December 2022 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ravishankar SathyamurthyRavishankar Sathyamurthy
Ravishankar Sathyamurthy
WEWael M. El-Maghlany
Wael M. El-Maghlany
MAMohammed El Hadi Attia
Mohammed El Hadi Attia
Abd Elnaby KabeelAbd Elnaby Kabeel
Abd Elnaby Kabeel
MAMohamed Abdelgaied
Mohamed Abdelgaied
SVS. Vasanthaseelan
S. Vasanthaseelan
The traditional method of obtaining fresh water for drinking is by burning fossil fuels, emitting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. However, renewable energy is gaining more traction since it is available free of cost for producing fresh water. In this study, Al2O3 nanoparticles were distributed in a phase change material (paraffin wax) that had been fixed at a hemispherical distiller water basin. Three scenarios with three hemispherical distillers were examined. A conventional hemispherical distiller (CHD), a conventional hemispherical distiller with paraffin wax as a phase change material (CHD-PCM), and a conventional hemispherical distiller with PCM partially filled with Al2O3 nanoparticles (CHD-N-PCM) were tested under the same climatic conditions. The experimental results showed that CHD gave a daily yield of 4.85 L/m2/day, while CHD-PCM increased the yield to up to 6.2 L/m2/day with a 27.84% daily yield enhancement. The addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles to paraffin wax CHD-N-PCM improved hemispherical distillate yield up to 8.3 L/m2/day with a 71.13% increase over CHD yield.

18 August 2023 in Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Abdelkader AbdullahAbdelkader Abdullah
Abdelkader Abdullah
LHL. Hadj-Taieb
L. Hadj-Taieb
HBHabib Ben Bacha
Habib Ben Bacha
AAAbdullah Alkhudhiri
Abdullah Alkhudhiri
TAT. E. M. Atteya
T. E. M. Atteya
FEFadl A. Essa
Fadl A. Essa

28 September 2020 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAbdullah Alkhudhiri
Abdullah Alkhudhiri
NDNawaf Bin Darwish
Nawaf Bin Darwish
MOHAMMED HAKAMIMOHAMMED HAKAMI
MOHAMMED HAKAMI
Abdelkader AbdullahAbdelkader Abdullah
Abdelkader Abdullah
AAAhmed Alsadun
Ahmed Alsadun
HHHosam Abu Homod
Hosam Abu Homod
Several Membrane Distillation (MD) technologies have been employed to remove boron from various concentrations. In this study, Vacuum Membrane Distillation (VMD), Permeate Gap Membrane Distillation (PGMD), and Air Gap Membrane Distillation (AGMD) are examined to evaluate their effectiveness when combined with several boron concentrations (1.5, 7 and 30 ppm) and operating parameters (circulation rate from 0.9 L/min to 5 L/min, feed temperature from 40 to 70 °C, and pH from 3–11). Those concentrations of boron are selected on the basis of the concentration of boron in the permeate side of the single-pass reverse osmosis (RO) system, Arabian Gulf, and contaminated brackish water. Moreover, synthetic seawater is treated to assess MD technologies’ effectiveness. A high removal efficiency of boron is accomplished by MD. AGMD, PGMD, and VMD are promising methods for the desalination industry. AGMD shows excellent boron removal, which was above 99% with a wide ranging concentration. In addition, VMD demonstrates good permeate flux compared to the other MD technologies, which were about 5.8 kg/m2·h for synthetic seawater. Furthermore, there is no noteworthy influence of the pH value on the boron removal efficiency.