Antonio Pantaleo

Dr. Antonio Pantaleo

1. Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, BA, Italy
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 January 2011 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMaria Teresa Carone
Maria Teresa Carone
Antonio PantaleoAntonio Pantaleo
Antonio Pantaleo
APAchille Pellerano
Achille Pellerano


6 March 2020 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jean-Michel ClairandJean-Michel Clairand
Jean-Michel Clairand
Marco Briceño-LeonMarco Briceño-Leon
Marco Briceño-Leon
Guillermo Escrivá-EscriváGuillermo Escrivá-Escrivá
Guillermo Escrivá-Escrivá
Antonio PantaleoAntonio Pantaleo
Antonio Pantaleo
The industry sector has a significant responsibility for the depletion of fossil fuels and emission of carbon dioxide. Thus, several initiatives have been implemented by the industry sector to mitigate those issues. One initiative corresponds to the implementation of energy efficiency strategies. In particular, the food industry is heavily dependent on fossil fuels, and the food demand is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. Therefore, developing energy efficiency strategies for this particular industrial sector is crucial. This paper investigates the different opportunities for energy efficiency in the food industry. It first provides a brief overview of the various food industries and related energy consumption. Then, the different options for energy efficiency in the thermal and electric sector are discussed. New trends and opportunities, arising from industry 4.0 and demand response, are also presented.

1 October 2017 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Antonio PantaleoAntonio Pantaleo
Antonio Pantaleo
SCSergio M. Camporeale
Sergio M. Camporeale
AMAdio Miliozzi
Adio Miliozzi
VRValeria Russo
Valeria Russo
NSNilay Shah
Nilay Shah
Christos MarkidesChristos Markides
Christos Markides
This paper focuses on the thermo-economic analysis of a 2.1-MWe and 960 kWt hybrid solar-biomass combined heat and power (CHP) system composed of a 1.4-MWe Externally Fired Gas-Turbine (EFGT) and a 0.7-MWe bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) power plant. The primary thermal energy input is provided by a hybrid Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) collector array covering a total ground area of 22,000–32,000 m2, coupled to a biomass boiler. The CSP collector array is based on parabolic-trough concentrators (PTCs) with molten salts as the heat transfer fluid (HTF), upstream of a 4.5–9.1 MWt fluidized-bed furnace for direct biomass combustion. In addition, two molten-salt tanks are considered that provide 4.8–18 MWh (corresponding to 1.3–5.0 h) of Thermal Energy Storage (TES), as a means of reducing the variations in the plant’s operating conditions, increasing the plant’s capacity factor and total operating hours (from 5500–6000 to 8000 h per year). On the basis of the results of the thermodynamic simulations, upfront and operational costs assessments, and considering an Italian energy policy scenario (feed-in tariffs, or FiTs, for renewable electricity), the global energy conversion efficiency and investment profitability of this plant are estimated for different sizes of CSP and biomass furnaces, different operation strategies (baseload and modulating) and cogenerative vs. electricity-only system configurations. Upfront costs in the range 4.3–9.5 MEur are reported, with operating costs in the range 1.5–2.3 MEur annually. Levelized costs of energy from around 100 Eur/MWh to above 220 Eur/MWh are found, along with net present values (NPVs) from close to 13,000 to −3000 kEur and internal rates of return (IRRs) from 30% down to almost zero when prioritizing electrical power generation (i.e., not in cogenerative mode). In all cases the economic viability of the systems deteriorate for larger CSP section sizes. The results indicate the low economic profitability of CSP integration in comparison to biomass-only plants, due to high investment costs of the former, which are not compensated by the higher global energy conversion efficiency and energy sales revenues

1 March 2020 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Antonio PantaleoAntonio Pantaleo
Antonio Pantaleo
SCSergio M. Camporeale
Sergio M. Camporeale
ASArianna Sorrentino
Arianna Sorrentino
AMAdio Miliozzi
Adio Miliozzi
NSNilay Shah
Nilay Shah
Christos MarkidesChristos Markides
Christos Markides