Background: The understanding of the real flow profiles through a dry powder inhaler (DPI), generated by asthma patients, is a prerequisite for satisfactory drug delivery to the lungs. The aims of the study were to assess the relationship between spirometric measures and inhalation profiles through a low-resistance DPI, and to compare parameters of those profiles between optimal and suboptimal inhalation technique type. Methods: Both healthy adult volunteers and patients with asthma were included in the study. Spirometry was conducted along with modified flow-volume test to detect expiratory levels (maximum “100%” exhalation to residual volume [RV] and halfway “50%” to RV). These were the reference levels of the depth of exhalation for each patient to simulate the effect of incomplete exhalation. Individual inhalation profiles were recorded using spirometry in-house software as the volumetric airflow through the inhaler versus time. Inspiratory flow parameters were extracted: time to peak inspiratory flow through inhaler (PIFinh), time at which peak inspiratory flow occurs (tPIFinh), total inhalation time (T), and inhaled volume during maneuver (V). Results and Conclusions: There are significant relationships between spirometric indices and parameters of inhalation through a low-resistance, cyclohaler-type DPI (assessed by single-factor analysis of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). Multiple regression models were constructed, predicting inspiratory flow parameters (including spirometric indices, demographic parameters, and inhaler's usage history as determinants). The exhalation halfway to RV before inhalation did not affect significantly PIFinh and tPIFinh (and, thus, initial flow dynamics) in asthma patients. T and V parameters were then significantly decreased, but seemed sufficient for successful DPI performance. Both exhalation to RV and incomplete exhalation halfway to RV preceding inhalation allow for effective usage of low-resistance DPI.
1 April 2022 in Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Background: The severity of airway obstruction may affect patient's ability to perform an effective drug inhalation from a dry powder inhaler (DPI). Also, an incorrect inhalation technique may negatively affect the efficacy of asthma treatment. The aims of the study were (1) to analyze and compare inhalation profiles recorded with the use of different inhalation techniques, and thus, (2) to establish model inhalation profiles representative for healthy subjects and subjects with mild and moderate-to-severe asthma. Methods: This study was performed in healthy volunteers, patients with mild and moderate-to-severe asthma. A modified flow-volume test to define two different expiratory levels (to residual volume and half-way to residual volume) was performed. Inspiratory flow parameters were extracted: peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFinh), time at which peak inspiratory flow rate occurs (tPIFinh), total inhalation time (T), and inhaled volume (V). Test of frequency for tPIFinh100% and tPIFinh50% by asthma severity was performed, to provide information about initial flow accelerations. The impact of two different expiratory levels preceding inhalation (with severity of asthma as a categorical factor) on inspiratory flow parameters was examined. Results: PIFinh was dependent upon asthma severity (p = 0.046). Type of exhalation before inhalation had no effect on PIFinh values. V value was significantly affected both by asthma severity (p = 0.024) and type of exhalation before inhalation (p < 0.0001). Mean T value was influenced by type of exhalation before inhalation (p = 0.0003), but not by asthma severity. Mean tPIFinh value was affected by the type of exhalation before inhalation only in healthy subjects (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Both asthma severity and type of exhalation before inhalation have little impact on the dynamics of inhalation through a DPI. An alternative form of equation describing inhalation profiles demonstrating a relationship between lung mechanics and dynamics of inspiratory profile has been proposed.
24 November 2023 in Chemical and Process Engineering: New Frontiers
Chemical and process engineering offers scientific tools for solving problems in the biomedical field, including drug delivery systems. This paper presents examples of analyzing the dynamics of dispersed systems (aerosols) in medical inhalers to establish a better relationship between the test evaluation results of these devices and the actual delivery of drugs to the lungs. This relationship is referred to as in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC). It has been shown that in dry powder inhalers (DPls), the aerosolization process and drug release times are determined by the inhalation profile produced by the patient. It has also been shown that inspiratory flow affects the size distribution of aerosols generated in other inhalation devices (vibrating mesh nebulizers, VMNs), which is due to the evaporation of droplets after the aerosol is mixed witha dditional air taken in by the patient. The effects demonstrated in this work are overlooked in standard inhaler testing methods, leading to inaccurate information about the health benefits of aerosol therapy, thus limiting the development of improved drug delivery systems.
The main goal was to investigate the ability of a non-thermal plasma reactor with gliding arc discharge to remove diesel exhaust particulates (DEPs). A conventional knife-shaped LTP GA (low-temperature plasma gliding arc) reactor was utilized. The following three cases were studied: 140 L/min, 70 L/min, and 14 L/min of air drawn through the reactor, and diesel exhaust fumes were sampled continuously. They were assayed in terms of concentration and number particle size distribution. The higher the residence times, the higher the energy input that may be utilized for DEPs’ removal. The reactor performance definitely lowered the concentration of DEPs (250–580 nm) and altered their number size distribution. There was no effect on the number concentration, nor the particle size distribution, of DEPs of 10–250 nm in size. Regarding the effectiveness of DEPs’ removal, decreasing the flow rate from 140 L/min to 70 L/min somehow altered the values. Achieving the airflow of 14 L/min led to a substantial improvement (even to a fourfold increase for 300–480 nm particles). Non-thermal plasma reactors with gliding arc discharge may be successfully adapted to the process of DEP treatment. Their performance may be optimized by adjusting the airflow at the inlet of the reactor to guarantee the longest aerosol residence times and the highest removal efficiency.