Vicarious calibration and validation techniques are important tools to ensure the long-term stability and inter-sensor consistency of satellite sensors making observations in the solar-reflective spectral domain. Automated test sites, which have continuous in situ monitoring of both ground reflectance and atmospheric conditions, can greatly increase the match-up possibilities for a wide range of space agency and commercial sensors. The Baotou calibration and validation test site in China provides operational high-accuracy and high-stability vicarious calibration and validation for high spatial resolution solar-reflective remote-sensing sensors. Two sites, given the abbreviations BTCN (an artificial site) and BSCN (a natural sandy site), have been selected as reference sites for the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites radiometric calibration network (RadCalNet). RadCalNet requires sites to provide data in a consistent format but does not specify the required operational conditions for a RadCalNet site. The two Baotou sites are the only sites to date that make spectral measurements for their continuous operation. One of the core principles of RadCalNet is that each site should have a metrologically rigorous uncertainty budget which also describes the site’s traceability to the international system of units, the SI. This paper shows a formalized metrological approach to determining and documenting the uncertainty budget and traceability of a RadCalNet site. This approach follows the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. The paper describes the uncertainty analysis for bottom-of-atmosphere and top-of-atmosphere reflectance in the spectral region from 400 to 1000 nm for the Baotou sites and gives preliminary results for the uncertainty propagating this to top-of-atmosphere reflectance.

With the development of a sustainable lifestyle, people are paying more and more attention to the comfort of their own living environment, including public space lighting, which is immediately accessible to residents. The demand on its quality and comfort has thus gained attention recently. However, there is still a lack of related research on public space lighting comfort evaluation models that combine nighttime light remote sensing data and field measurement data, and link lighting attributes with the comfort of residents. This research uses nighttime light remote sensing data to select typical test areas, measures the lighting data of the survey points on the spot, develops an intelligent WeChat applet that collects public perception data, analyzes different lighting parameters, and builds a public space lighting comfort model based on the structural equation model analysis method. The results show that the factor that the areas with high light intensity are more comfortable than the areas with low light intensity. In areas with high light intensity, people pay more attention to the uniformity, security and comfort of the light, while in areas with low light intensity or high blue light, people’s perception of glare will be more obvious. This research can provide a basis for the intelligent optimization of public space lighting from the perspective of public preference.

The GaoFen6 (GF-6) satellite, equipped with a wide full-swath (WFV) sensor, offers high spatial resolution and extensive coverage, making it widely utilized in agricultural and forestry classification, land resource monitoring, and other fields. Accurate on-orbit radiometric calibration of GF-6/WFV is crucial for these quantitative applications. Currently, the absolute radiometric calibration of GF-6/WFV relies primarily on vicarious calibration conducted by the China Center for Resources Satellite Data and Application (CRESDA). However, annual vicarious calibration may not adequately capture the radiometric performance of GF-6/WFV due to performance degradation. Therefore, increasing the frequency of on-orbit radiometric calibration throughout the lifetime of GF-6/WFV is essential. This study proposes a method for conducting long-term cross-radiometric calibrations of GF-6/WFV by taking the multispectral imager (MSI) onboard the Sentinel-2 satellite as a reliable reference sensor and the sites from RadCalNet as reference ground targets. Firstly, we conducted 62 on-orbit cross-radiometric calibrations of GF-6/WFV since its launch by tracking with the Sentinel-2/MSI sensor after correcting the discrepancy spectrum and solar zenith angle. Then, validation of cross-radiometric calibration results against RadCalNet products indicated an average absolute relative error between 3.55% and 4.64%. Cross-validation with additional reference sensors, including Landsat-8/OLI and MODIS, confirmed the reliability of calibration, demonstrating relative differences from GF-6/WFV of less than 5%. Furthermore, the overall uncertainty of the cross-radiometric calibration was estimated to be from 4.08% to 4.89%. Finally, trend analysis of the time-series radiometric performance was also conducted and revealed an annual degradation rate ranging from 0.57% to 2.31%. This degradation affects surface reflectance retrieval, introducing a bias of approximately 0.0073 to 0.0084. Our findings highlight the operational effectiveness of the proposed method in achieving long-time-series on-orbit radiometric calibration and degradation monitoring of GF-6/WFV. The study also demonstrates that the radiometric performance of GF-6/WFV is relatively stable and suitable for further quantitative applications, especially for long-term monitoring applications.

Optical satellite sensor generally suffers from drifts and biases relative to their pre-launch calibration, caused by launch and the space environment. Radiometric cross-calibration is valuable for calibrating sensors without coincident surface measurements through transfer radiometric values between satellite sensor via stable target. Since the data quality of GF-4/VNIR data seriously depends on vicarious calibration, which is performed once every year, cross-calibration is proposed for monitoring its radiometric performance much more frequently. In this study, the GF-4/VNIR is cross-calibrated by Landsat8/OLI, Sentinel-2/MSI, and Terra/MODIS with the aid of the tandem scenes during 2017 and 2018 after correcting the discrepancy on viewing geometries and spectrum. The results show that there is test site dependency and sensor dependency, and cross-calibration coefficients in the four bands roughly has similar degradation trend as a cosine function during 2017 and 2018, varying from 0.0002 to 0.00065. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis of the cross-calibration is carried out to analyze the uncertainty contributions affecting the cross-calibration accuracy. Note that the calibration accuracy of reference sensors, the uncertainty of MODTRAN model, BRDF uncertainty are the three main factors affecting the cross-calibration accuracy, the total uncertainty is approximately 3.9%-6.64%.

This article addressed the simultaneous retrieval of land surface temperature (LST) and emissivity (LST&E) from the time-series thermal infrared data. On the basis of the assumption that the time-series LSTs can be described by a piecewise linear function, a new method has been proposed to simultaneously retrieve LST&E from atmospherically corrected time-series thermal infrared data using LST linear constraint. A detailed analysis has been performed against various errors, including error introduced by the method assumption, instrument noise, initial emissivity, atmospheric downwelling radiance error, etc. The proposed method from the simulated data is more immune to noise than the existing methods. Even with a noise equivalent delta temperature of 0.5 K, the root-mean-square error of LST is observed to be only 0.13 K, and that of the land surface emissivity (LSE) is 1.8E-3. In addition, our proposed method is simple and efficient and does not encounter the problem of singular values unlike the existing methods. To validate the proposed method, a field experiment from June to September 2017 was conducted for sand target in Baotou site, China. The results show that the samples have an accuracy of LST within 0.87 K and that the mean values of LSE are accurate to 0.01.

Field calibration is a feasible way to evaluate space-borne optical sensor observations via natural or artificial sites on Earth’s surface with the aid of synchronous surface and atmospheric characteristic data. Since field calibration is affected by the coupled effects of surface and atmospheric characteristics, the single calibration results acquired under different surface and atmospheric conditions have different biases and different uncertainties, making it difficult to determine the consistency of these multiple calibration results. In view of this, by assuming that the radiometric performance is invariant during field calibration and the calibration samples are independent of each other, the surface–atmosphere invariant Key Comparison Reference Value (KCRV) is essentially derived from various calibration results. As the number of calibration samples increases, the uncertainty in the KCRV should decrease, and the KCRV should approach the “true” value. This paper addresses a novel method for estimating a weighted average value from multiple calibration results that can be used to compare each calibration result, and this value is accepted as the KCRV. Furthermore, this method is preliminarily applied to the field calibration of the Multispectral Instrument (MSI) onboard the Sentinel-2B satellite via the desert target at the Baotou site, China. After employing a chi-squared test to verify that 12 calibration samples are independent from each other, the KCRV of the 12 calibration samples at the Baotou site is derived, which exhibits much lower uncertainty than a single sample. The results show that the KCRVs of the relative differences between the simulated and observed at-sensor reflectance are 3.75%, 5.11%, 6.09%, and 5.03% for the four bands of Sentinel-2B/MSI, respectively, and the corresponding uncertainties are 1.84%, 1.87%, 1.90%, and 1.93%. It is noted that the KCRV uncertainty obtained with only 12 calibration samples is reduced significantly, and in the future, more samples in other instrumented sites will be used to validate this method thoroughly.